They lead us to close this book on what should be more than a paradox. C.Courtois, achieving his thesis, tought that the real drama of roman Africa wasn't the Vandal invasion, but the rebirth of a Berber world remained itself, meaning rejecting necessary the romanity.
At the end of this long study, we wonder if the real rupture in this history wasn't the Byzantine reconquest.
Without this, in an easter Maghreb where the Roman influence was really strong, the Maur expansion could have lead, not without violence, to a Berbero-Roman civilisation, original and maintainable, as was Merovingian civilisation in Gaul.
The "divine surprise" that was Belisarius' sucessful expedition, aprooved by a roman society proclaiming its fear of the Maur, broke this possibility. Maybe did it as well condamned the future of the romanity it claimed to save.