WI: Battle of Narva-Charles XII killed

What if during last stages of battle of Narva (19 November 1700)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Narva_(1700)
young Swedish monarch is wounded by musket ball and dies from his wound short after the battle? Russian army is defeated but at the same time Sweden lost its king, who happened to be skilled millitary leader. Field marshall Rehnskiöld takes command over Swedish army, but what would he do now, when king is dead?

12 years old Ulrika, Charles' sister is now queen, so regency is needed, Swedish absolutism is over. Saxon army besieged Riga-IOTL Carl headed south against them after Narva.
 
Last edited:
But now Russians (and Saxons, Danes, Prussians) would see Carl's death as great opportunity to grab Swedish lands-Prussians want Stettin, Russians want access to Baltic (although they have to rebuild their army first), Frederick Augustus of Saxony wants Riga.
 
What if during last stages of battle of Narva (19 November 1700)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Narva_(1700)
young Swedish monarch is wounded by musket ball and dies from his wound short after the battle? Russian army is defeated but at the same time Sweden lost its king, who happened to be skilled millitary leader. Field marshall Rehnskiöld takes command over Swedish army, but what would he do now, when king is dead?

12 years old Ulrika, Charles' sister is now queen, so regency is needed, Swedish absolutism is over. Saxon army besieged Riga-IOTL Carl headed south against them after Narva.

Considering the REAL power in Stockholm was held by grandma. As she was instrumental in arranging Hedvig Sofia's wedding to her Holsteiner cousin, I would imagine that we're in for Queen Hedvig rather than Ulrika. Not only that, but it puts Holstein in PU with Stockholm, which might make Denmark rather uncomfortable.
 
But now Russians (and Saxons, Danes, Prussians) would see Carl's death as great opportunity to grab Swedish lands-Prussians want Stettin, Russians want access to Baltic (although they have to rebuild their army first), Frederick Augustus of Saxony wants Riga.

Sorry but this got me thinking, maybe he gets incapacitated somehow rather than dying. Say a good blow to the head doesn't kill him. There's a possibility of him waking back up but he won't be governing any time soon, putting a regency in charge. Would that regency take the offer of retaining Livonia sans St. Petersburg? Maybe ask for monetary compensation as well?
 
Sorry but this got me thinking, maybe he gets incapacitated somehow rather than dying. Say a good blow to the head doesn't kill him. There's a possibility of him waking back up but he won't be governing any time soon, putting a regency in charge. Would that regency take the offer of retaining Livonia sans St. Petersburg? Maybe ask for monetary compensation as well?
Sankt-Petersburg area (city itself do not exist yet) would cut off Livonia's land connection with rest of Sweden, so Swedes won't be able to keep it for long with both tsar Peter and Frederick Augustus of Saxony wanting that land. At this moment it is hard to achieve peace acceptable for both sides.
 
A land connection is not that important before the railways. Anyway, in 1700, Petersburg was not in existence, and if the battle went as historically, the question is rather what Russia would cede to get peace.
 
Best thing Swedes could do is continue marsh into Russia, Carl did it IOTL but few years later, giving Russians time to recover and finally lost, but even then Russia was on the edge of collapse.
But I doubt they'll start great offensive when king is dead.
 
Top