Well, it was more of a "Rule of Cool" suggestion than a serious one actually.Snip
Well, it was more of a "Rule of Cool" suggestion than a serious one actually.Snip
Well, it was more of a "Rule of Cool" suggestion than a serious one actually.
Um, I fail to see how a regional, vaguely Afghanized interpretation of the god Surya will arise as a result of, well, anything.
Well, wouldn't you escape the whole caliphal succession crisis kerfuffle, with people on one side saying Ali is the rightful heir to Muhammad, others putting in support for Abu Bakr? And then you won't have people like Khawarij who don't want caliph at all and will tear the fledgling empire apart and will have to be dealt with before further expansion is possible. I'm not saying that without a religious angle to the invasions there will be no such thing as a succession crisis, but like Genghis, I think there will be enough asabiyyah among the Arabs simply by the virtue of having such strong leadership, and of course having victory after victory will be guaranteed to further fortify cohesion amongst the Arabs.
Arab empire will likely fall apart after the loss of the initial Genghis figure and become divided, and end up adopting religions like Christianity or Zoroastrianism over time, or even other choices like Manichaeanism and maybe other Gnostic religions.
The tribal clan structure of Arab society could also be a detriment to long term cohesion in an Arab empire without a unifying religion, so consider who the ruling clan is and what clans would rather break off or attain some autonomy.
Is it? I recall reading that Afghan devotees tended to syncretize him with Shiva.
There was no supporters of Ali that were vocal until the reign of Uthman ibn Affan. Abu Bakr assumed rule mostly without protest, except from Abu Sufyan. Ali ibn Talib, was a foot soldier and a young man, he was in all ways the inferior of Abu Bakr at the time of succession and by far the inferior of Umar.
I never said this was at the time, but Ali / Abu Bakr divide obviously turned into a major political divide down the line and an even greater and persisting religious divide. But that's not relevant to this thread, the point I was making was that with an Arab Genghis you avoid this sort of religious doctrinal differences stemming from political disagreements and you thus have less infighting among the Arabs. Though the more important question is how big an empire the Arabs can hold without Islam.
I never said this was at the time, but Ali / Abu Bakr divide obviously turned into a major political divide down the line and an even greater and persisting religious divide. But that's not relevant to this thread, the point I was making was that with an Arab Genghis you avoid this sort of religious doctrinal differences stemming from political disagreements and you thus have less infighting among the Arabs. Though the more important question is how big an empire the Arabs can hold without Islam.
Obviously, the title he'd take wouldn't be Khalifa. Maybe the Arab form of King of Kings or simply the Conqueror. But IDK.
I disagree, but I lack the interest to enunciate.
Right. Can you muster up just a smidgen of interest to mention what it is you disagree with?
So there will be a degree of cultural assimilation to a united Arabdom no matter whether the tribes are united by religion or not.