https://www.alternatehistory.com/fo...nia-persists-remains-joined-to-naples.415943/
A year ago, there was this thread on a successful Angevin Albania after a reverse outcome at the Siege of Berat, and i just wanted to revive the discussion.
So, suppose that Hugh of Sully is successful in taking Berat from the post-Nicaean Byzantines, paving the way for raids and operations in Macedonia.
Does Charles I of Sicily, then stationed in Southern Italy, decide to mount a full-scale invasion of the Byzantine Empire across the Via Egnatia?
Considering the brief unification of the Western and Eastern Churches at the 1274 Council of Lyon, do the Angevins decide to restore the Latin Empire if the war ends in their favour?
What happens to other polities in the Balkans, mainly the Despotate of Epirus, Bulgaria, Serbia, and the Principality of Achaea? Do they take advantage of the situation to grab some chunks of land from the Byzantines while they're occupied with the Angevins?
Does a success at Berat dissuade the sicilians from revolting?
A year ago, there was this thread on a successful Angevin Albania after a reverse outcome at the Siege of Berat, and i just wanted to revive the discussion.
So, suppose that Hugh of Sully is successful in taking Berat from the post-Nicaean Byzantines, paving the way for raids and operations in Macedonia.
Does Charles I of Sicily, then stationed in Southern Italy, decide to mount a full-scale invasion of the Byzantine Empire across the Via Egnatia?
Considering the brief unification of the Western and Eastern Churches at the 1274 Council of Lyon, do the Angevins decide to restore the Latin Empire if the war ends in their favour?
What happens to other polities in the Balkans, mainly the Despotate of Epirus, Bulgaria, Serbia, and the Principality of Achaea? Do they take advantage of the situation to grab some chunks of land from the Byzantines while they're occupied with the Angevins?
Does a success at Berat dissuade the sicilians from revolting?
Last edited: