As opposed to the peace-loving and utterly nonviolent Aztecs, Comanche, Mapuche, etc?I thought they would include Maori which would make conquest of the Americas a slight more tad difficult cause of warrior nature and never say die attitude.
I assume the time period is about the same, about 10,000 years ago. I don't see a significant difference between people migrating from the south to north as opposed to OTL (north to south). Sea level would rise, migration from the Old World would stop and the Americas would be populated much like OTL. There is no reason they could not have cultivated maize/corn.
Now, if the Polynesians maintained Pacific contact, that could make a difference.
They weren’t cannibals, I don’t think.As opposed to the peace-loving and utterly nonviolent Aztecs, Comanche, Mapuche, etc?
They weren’t cannibals, I don’t think.