On the retirement of Alfred von Schlieffen, Quartermaster-General Helmuth von Moltke became Chief of the General Staff. Wikipedia provides this:
What if Moltke had been unavailable to become Q-G in 1904, allowing one of the three men mentioned above (or perhaps someone else entirely) to become CGS after Schlieffen? How does change Germany's strategic planning and her performance in the Great War?
In 1904 Moltke was made Quartermaster-General; in effect, Deputy Chief of the General Staff. In 1906, he became chief on the retirement of Alfred von Schlieffen. His appointment was controversial then and remains so today. The other likely candidates for the position were Hans Hartwig von Beseler, Karl von Bülow and Colmar Freiherr von der Goltz.[2]:68 Critics charge that Moltke gained the position on the strength of his name and his friendship with the Kaiser. Certainly, Moltke was far closer to the Kaiser than the other candidates. Historians argue that Beseler was too close to Schlieffen to have succeeded him, while Bülow and Goltz were too independent for Wilhelm to have accepted them. Moltke's friendship with the Kaiser permitted him a latitude that others could not have enjoyed. Goltz, at least, saw nothing wrong with Moltke's performance as Chief.[2]:71
What if Moltke had been unavailable to become Q-G in 1904, allowing one of the three men mentioned above (or perhaps someone else entirely) to become CGS after Schlieffen? How does change Germany's strategic planning and her performance in the Great War?