He had a fairly good idea of how far it was. He didn't starve at least.Alternatively, there is no Columbus, but the equivalent expedition is done by someone who actually knows how big the earth is, and so "discovers" America farther north (eg Newfoundland). In time, subsequent explorers sail up the St Lawrence or down the east coast looking for the passage west, and so the wealthier native nations aren't discovered until decades after OTL.
He didn't know America was there, that's why he thought he was in the Indies.He had a fairly good idea of how far it was. He didn't starve at least.
That is correct, and if I have this right I think he thought the Norse had reached Siberia and estimated a similar distance.He didn't know America was there, that's why he thought he was in the Indies.
That is correct, and if I have this right I think he thought the Norse had reached Siberia and estimated a similar distance.
There's definitely a possibility of that. He was in all accounts a slippery guy.I've read some arguments that his idea of the world's size was to support evidence in favor of his trip, not that he actually believed it was that small.
How would the history of the Americas be changed if Columbus landed somewhere else outside of the Bahamas?
What empires would rise up in different places?
Likely places
Lesser Antilles
Florida or Georgia
Bermuda
He keeps going somehow to Jamaica or even the Yucatan?
That happened OTLThe Brazil route. Just have the Portuguese get blown off course while trying to skirt the Bight of Benin.
Answering the OP-
Lesser Antilles - maybe identical results or maybe Columbus and crew get eaten by Caribs
Florida or Georgia - higher chance of Columbus and crew getting killed. If they succeed and Columbus advertises his discovery well, Spain would almost surely control much further up the Atlantic coast, to the Chesapeake or Manhattan.
Bermuda- the crew is unimpressed, mutinies and fails to get back
Jamaica - identical to OTL
Yucatan - similar to OTL or more likely to get killed by a warlike group and not make it back. If Columbus survives to bring back a good report and the Spaniards are as aggressive ever after, there's a *chance* the conquest and exploitation of Mexico is acccelerated.
Ah, so seeing as the first voyage is likely to reach Newfoundland, and either go west into the St Lawrence or south to Nova Scotia, they're not likely to run into the weed in the earliest settlements.Tobacco was grown as far north as Connecticut.
This is about what I'm thinking too; it won't be super-profitable for the Europeans at first, so the going will be slower, but it will be beneficial enough to maintain a presence in the area, with friendlier (or "friendlier") relations. If the first voyage does make it to Nova Scotia, that means the Wabanaki Confederacy (who have allied tribes as far south as most of OTL Maine) will be major partners, or victims, or both. Meanwhile, I would be surprised if they've even made it as far as the southern tip of Flordia within the first decade, meaning not only do they still think the route to Asia is just around the corner (unlike OTL, where Amerigo figured out the size of the landmass in 1502) but the Caribbean remains un-ravaged, with the Europeans barely aware of their existence, much less how to make them profitable. Oh, and the great civilizations of the Mississippi, Mesoamerica, and what not, have yet still to make contact with these Europeans.New World initial colonization by a northern route, without Iberian participation would be based at first on the bounty of animal products, fish and furs. In the early decades, such colonization could be very gradual and small-scale and non-domineering over the natives....
That's one question. The other question would be if the pace of navigation to figure how to get *around* this landmass would be any slower than OTL.
That's a good question. I will say, speaking of which, that religious strife will most certainly still happen, though it may look very different from OTL (or similar, if you think in broad enough strokes).The question becomes as religious strife really heats up in northern Europe in the 1500s and 1600s, do we see the beginning of mass family based settlement anyway?
Ah, so seeing as the first voyage is likely to reach Newfoundland, and either go west into the St Lawrence or south to Nova Scotia, they're not likely to run into the weed in the earliest settlements.
This is about what I'm thinking too; it won't be super-profitable for the Europeans at first, so the going will be slower, but it will be beneficial enough to maintain a presence in the area, with friendlier (or "friendlier") relations. If the first voyage does make it to Nova Scotia, that means the Wabanaki Confederacy (who have allied tribes as far south as most of OTL Maine) will be major partners, or victims, or both. Meanwhile, I would be surprised if they've even made it as far as the southern tip of Flordia within the first decade, meaning not only do they still think the route to Asia is just around the corner (unlike OTL, where Amerigo figured out the size of the landmass in 1502) but the Caribbean remains un-ravaged, with the Europeans barely aware of their existence, much less how to make them profitable. Oh, and the great civilizations of the Mississippi, Mesoamerica, and what not, have yet still to make contact with these Europeans.
That's a good question. I will say, speaking of which, that religious strife will most certainly still happen, though it may look very different from OTL (or similar, if you think in broad enough strokes).
Answering the OP-
Lesser Antilles - maybe identical results or maybe Columbus and crew get eaten by Caribs
Florida or Georgia - higher chance of Columbus and crew getting killed. If they succeed and Columbus advertises his discovery well, Spain would almost surely control much further up the Atlantic coast, to the Chesapeake or Manhattan.
Bermuda- the crew is unimpressed, mutinies and fails to get back
Jamaica - identical to OTL
Yucatan - similar to OTL or more likely to get killed by a warlike group and not make it back. If Columbus survives to bring back a good report and the Spaniards are as aggressive ever after, there's a *chance* the conquest and exploitation of Mexico is acccelerated.
Most of the Maya were conquered in a fairly nasty guerilla war in the 1500s; the more remote areas held out longer, but a lot of that was by not seeming to be worth the expense of conquest (the land was poor and the Yucatan in general something of a backwater by the time the Spanish showed up, so few would-be conquistadors had any appetite for it, especially after the expensive and difficult struggle for the rest of the Yucatan had proven so unprofitable for its conquerors). Making deals with other nations moves those remote realms up from "not worth bothering with" to "potential threat; better squash them now," and they aren't located in places that other Europeans could send aid to easily even if they wanted to.Speaking of the Maya, I know it actually took a long time, until the mid or late 1600s, for the Spanish to defeat all the Mayan Kingdoms. Is there a plausible way for a Maya polity to survive with aid from the Netherlands, France or England?
Bermuda- the crew is unimpressed, mutinies and fails to get back.
Didn't they expect there to be a couple islands on the way to Asia? This could be one of them.
Fair point, though wasn't it something like 50 years after first settlement that New England started whaling? They may have started fishing Cod right away, though; then again, Portugal was already expanding Cod fishing, so it wouldn't be a fish monopoly or anything. (Furs are mentioned.)You guys are overlooking the Cod from the Grand Banks and the furs that could have been had in modern day Canadian Maritimes and New England (those furs in New England helped keep the settlers there going economically for some time too), plus of course whales