redlightning
Banned
What if instead of finding no weapons in 2003 as OTL, what if American and Allied forces instead find a large arsenal of WMDs and facilities actively producing material for them?
If they had serious wmd the Iraqi's woudl have used them
Anti-war sentiment would be blunted. Most of such will exist solely over issues of the administration making bad decisions (e.g. dissolving the army). However, the occupation is still going to have the same kind of problems facing it, and the Bush administration is going to be trying to rush through things as OTL.
This. WMDs are use it or lose weapons.
If they had serious wmd the Iraqi's woudl have used them
What if instead of finding no weapons in 2003 as OTL, what if American and Allied forces instead find a large arsenal of WMDs and facilities actively producing material for them?
Didn't they find chemical weapons OTL stored in Iraq? I admit to having poor knowledge of the scenario, but I'm pretty sure that chemical weapons are considered WMDs.
What if instead of finding no weapons in 2003 as OTL, what if American and Allied forces instead find a large arsenal of WMDs and facilities actively producing material for them?
If they had serious wmd the Iraqi's woudl have used them
What if instead of finding no weapons in 2003 as OTL, what if American and Allied forces instead find a large arsenal of WMDs and facilities actively producing material for them?