The last I think is what prevents a traditional market, and also why Anarcho-Capitalists really need to take into account some of their influences better.
Simply put, Stirner places no value on property, at all. Possession sounds more like what he would be for, and that is something that's extremely Socialistic, with many left Anarchists arguing for it. Possession, after all, is basically owning what you use, which goes along with the whole, "might," thing he argues with holding property.
So yes, expect something based on Syndicalism to form. Something with markets that could perhaps happen is for elements of Mutualism to be applied, which would allow possession based markets.
The whole ideology will have the advantage that it no can claim it's altruistic, and therefore avoid the whole, "humans are too selfish," argument. If anything, people will have to argue against selfishness, which would have interesting implications.
But most of all, there will probably be many ideologies based on Stirner. The left will take on a form that will have both wider appeal, but also more terrifying implications for some.
Simply put, Stirner places no value on property, at all. Possession sounds more like what he would be for, and that is something that's extremely Socialistic, with many left Anarchists arguing for it. Possession, after all, is basically owning what you use, which goes along with the whole, "might," thing he argues with holding property.
So yes, expect something based on Syndicalism to form. Something with markets that could perhaps happen is for elements of Mutualism to be applied, which would allow possession based markets.
The whole ideology will have the advantage that it no can claim it's altruistic, and therefore avoid the whole, "humans are too selfish," argument. If anything, people will have to argue against selfishness, which would have interesting implications.
But most of all, there will probably be many ideologies based on Stirner. The left will take on a form that will have both wider appeal, but also more terrifying implications for some.