WI: A Hungarian Pope in 1513

This is a reboot of @Kellan Sullivan's thread from a while back: https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-a-hungarian-pope-tamás-bakócz.428799/
To quote from that thread's OP:
In the papal conclave following the death of Pope Julius II, Giovanni de' Medici beat out Tamás Bakócz (whom one historian compares to Wolsey) by five votes. But say Bakócz had been elected. Bakócz went back to Hungary after the conclave with papal authority to organize a Crusade that ended in a peasant rebellion (the Parasztlázadás). If Bakócz gets elected pope, he's probably still issuing a bull for the crusade, and Europe's rulers will probably pay about as much attention to it as the previous papal bulls for a crusade against the Turks (i.e. applaud politely and go about their day as usual). But how might Bakócz deal with Luther? In the movie "Luther", Leo is described as a spiritual dwarf, unsuited to the task of dealing with the mad monk from Saxony. Would Bakócz (no idea what name he'd take - don't know of any prior Hungarian popes, and Pope Thomas might invoke too poor a comparison to St. Thomas Doubting, St. Thomas á Becket etc) be any better suited to deal with Luther than was Leo?
 
His father was a peasent and he started off pretty low and finally got to be the most important clerics of Hungary and immensly rich. He was talented at intrigue and politics for sure.

According to Wiki he promised that if he would be elected he would use his wealth to finance a Crusade against the Ottomans.

He was leading quite a luxorious life however I dont think he would have spent nearly as much on art as Leo. He would die about the same time as Leo.
 
How would Bakócz deal with the ongoing War of the League of Cambrai?
Bakócz kept Hungary out of the war IOTL. However, he's now leader of the Holy League, and in the war whether he wants to be or not. He could pull the papacy out of the war, if it's in the interest of the papacy, as Leo X did.
 
Last edited:
If Bakócz approves the sale of indulgences to pay for his crusade, would this be thought of differently from the indulgences to pay for St. Peter's basilica?

As Bakócz comes from a background in the peasantry, is it possible we could see a Catholic peasants' revolt? In light of the Lutheran-leaning nobles' rejection of the peasants, could they claim authority from the commoner pope?
 
Bakócz kept Hungary out of the war IOTL. However, he's now leader of the Holy League, and in the war whether he wants to be or not. He could pull the papacy out of the war, if it's in the interest of the papacy, as Leo X did.
What would the relationship of Tamas, as Pope, with the Swiss Confederacy be like? Would he (at least nominally) ally with them, as Leo X did IOTL?
 
What would the relationship of Tamas, as Pope, with the Swiss Confederacy be like? Would he (at least nominally) ally with them, as Leo X did IOTL?
I'm sorry to say I just don't know enough about the Renaissance era Papacy to give a precise answer, but I can't think of a reason Bakócz wouldn't ally with them. He seems to have been a pretty shrewd guy, so I suppose he would have.
 
Top