That's base ten, and how is that related to phalanx-counting?
You argued that gestures couldn't represent huge numbers, I pointed you that they can. (Also, don't quote pictures, please)
It's an exemple on how a similar method can be used with a base 12.
If the method of counting (phalanx) doesn't apply to gesture, I don't see how it would get picked up by primitive human.
Because primitive humans are too primitive to come out with another hand comput than base-10?
I would hazard to guess that base-12s are developed as calender (12 months a year isn't hard for primitive human to figure out) usage was extended to other mathematical usage.
It's more the reverse : with a same system counting (present as well in Mesopotamia, Ancient Europe and China) you can end with base-12, base-60, and other derivatives.
I don't say that moon observation didn't strengthened the use, at least symbolically, but the use of 12 for them is essentially tied up with the division of year on them (even the hardcore decimal revolutionnary calendar ended up with 12 months).
It's not as, furthermore, base-10 and base-12, were mutually exclusive : for a good part of Middle Ages, the second was used popularly : not only for money but for mental representation (For exemple, when it was about giving an approximate age, people went with 24, 36 or 48 rather than 30, 40, 50)
Off-topic, but are all of you capable of bending your little finger with ring finger extended? Many around me can't and I can only do it with one hand.
Well, of course.
It's not like Dexterity was really a fix stat furthermore, you can make your fingers more flexible.