This. The "navalized F-111A" that is proposed wouldn't be able to operate from these carriers. Not from any carrier more likely because the F-111A still is a superheavy aircraft.
In any case, going for any form of common service large bomber like the F-111 was doomed to fail. The real POD and really missed opportunity was when the US decided to cancel the F401 turbofan, and with it the entire F-14B program, while pretty much halving the amount of F-14s ordered. The flawed F-14A that the USN got was never supposed to be the main production variant, in particular because the Navy didn't want the completely unsuited TF-30 turbofan in it. The F-14B was to have the F401, plus many useful improvements like an APU and some redesigned mechanisms and components which would likely have increased reliability or serviceability, and maybe reduced operating costs. Only a few dozen As were planned and would have been rebuilt as Bs later.
What is more is that the F-14B was supposed to be followed by the F-14C, a version with improved avionics to the level of the A-6 Intruder, which would fill the big bomber role this TL's F-111B does, but better. This may have led to less A-6s or A-7s being needed. Of course the big butterfly is that the USN would not have got the F-18 which would have been too expensive, but instead a smaller and cheaper supplementary aircraft.
Of course, this would have been way easier to achieve if the USN hadn't been forced to waste money on the F-111B in the first place.
Edit: Bonus point as I said in another thread, this would result in a more suited airframe for the USAF F-111, and the F401 being adopted may lead to a mid-life update of the USAF F-111 to replace the TF-30. Aka, my dream US variable geometry airforces timeline.