corourke
Donor
So I was reading this website that says there was a canal that linked the Nile to the Red Sea (and obviously from there to the Mediterranean) pretty much throughout history until the Abbasids destroyed it in the 8th Century. It's also on Wikipedia.
http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi1257.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_canal#12th_Dynasty
Apparently, the canal was passable to ocean-traveling ships. Probably these were flat-bottomed galleys.
So why wasn't this rebuilt before the 19th century? It seems to me that the Venetians would have wanted to do this, and if not them, then why not the Ottoman Empire (who also had the added benefit of owning the land around the canal).
A canal like this could have been built at any time, and would have been incredibly useful for those in control of it. So why wasn't it built?
By 250 BC, a substantial canal linked the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. It was fifty yards wide and it served ocean-going vessels. Cleopatra probably rode that canal in her royal barge, a few years before the birth of Christ.
http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi1257.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_canal#12th_Dynasty
Apparently, the canal was passable to ocean-traveling ships. Probably these were flat-bottomed galleys.
So why wasn't this rebuilt before the 19th century? It seems to me that the Venetians would have wanted to do this, and if not them, then why not the Ottoman Empire (who also had the added benefit of owning the land around the canal).
A canal like this could have been built at any time, and would have been incredibly useful for those in control of it. So why wasn't it built?