Why isn't GFM von Bock regarded as highly as Rommel or von Manstein?

He smashed enemy armies in Poland, the Low Countries and Barbarossa. He won several impressive victories on the Eastern front like Smolensk '41, Minsk '41 and Kharkov '42 and the early battles of Case Blue.

He was an excellent strategist, he tried to conserve resources (supply and forces) and carefully used his forces throughout his campaigns in order to get the pot of gold at the end.

To take Moscow, von Bock needed a straight path without interruptions. The worst winter in 50 years did not help him after the conflicting orders he received nor did Hitler, (as usual) interference with the plans of the army.

Maybe it's due to the fact that he was killed without producing 'best selling' memoirs like Manstein.

What do you think?
 
He was dead before the germans absolved themselves of all crimes,and wasn't fanboyed by important westerners.
 
Died before the end of the war so unlike Manstein he couldn't secure his place in history by publicising his achievements and unlike Rommel he was never used as a Bogeyman by the Western Powers to explain why the weren't able to use their enormous numerical and material superiority to win more quickly in the Desert.
 
Top