Wolfpaw
Banned
Oh, okay then!No srry It wasn't at you it was at Lonewolf and the other people who started the 7 page flame thread:... Justifing two crazy psycopaths both were evil...
Oh, okay then!No srry It wasn't at you it was at Lonewolf and the other people who started the 7 page flame thread:... Justifing two crazy psycopaths both were evil...
Yes, you're bleating about Vian's illegal actions while ignoring Dau's illegal actions and Norway's failure to perform it's legal duty as a neutral. Vian acted illegally because Dau's and Norway's illegal actions left him in a position where he was forced to act illegally.
And we're not talking about murders, butchering captives, or defiling the dead either so your pathetic attempts to link Vian's actions with the horrific acts committed by both sides are disgusting.
Vian boarded the Altmark in defiance of the law in order to rescue prisoners. He did not commit an illegal act in order to murder people or defile their corpses and your deliberate inability to discern any difference between Vian's actions and Eichman's is just one of the usual semantic tricks which have employed by Axis apologists since 1945.
In your disgusting mind, the fact that Vian boarded the Altmark and the fact that US troops collected "relics" in the face of constant official prohibitions means that the UK and US are "guilty" of war crimes on the same level as a Germany which industrialized genocide and a Japan which used Manchurian villages and Allied POWs alike as biowarfare subject.
We're talking about a matter of degree, not kind here, and the fact that degrees matter in war crimes was firmly established at Nuremberg when every person convicted wasn't executed.
You either can't comprehend that degrees matter, much like you cannot comprehend how to use the quote function, or you're refusing to understand the issue for political reasons which means you are either stupid or a Nazi apologist.
I know which way I'm betting.
there is no way you are from essex...Oh he'll why can't we be sensible mature people instead of whiney four year olds my god this thread has become worse than a dbz and Naruto fanbky yelling at each other get back on the topic........:/
I have often thought if you could have got a conditional surrender in '43 rather than an unconditional surrender in '45 how many millions of lives would have been saved.
How many people in Eastern Europe - not Nazi's - would have lived? How much better 'might' their lives have been without an Iron curtain and communist governments. What might the world have looked like without the Cold War that many of us grew up with?
How do you imposed conditions that are strong enough to prevent a repeat in the 60's or 70's but that let the Axis know that they lost?
Maybe its just becasue it is a possible issue in one of my TL's but how many millions of innocent lives should you be willing to sacrifice to gain unconditional surrender?