Currently trying to decide what my next timeline should be on, and I've hit a snag.
Trying to decide whether I want the House of Stuart or the House of Oldenburg as the monarch for Britain as it evolves into a constitutonal monarch.
The scenarios: James II dies from an injury taken whilst out riding in 1688, his death scuppers what plans there might have been for a revolution and instead a scramble for the regency begins.
Or
Glorious revolution happens, Anne's children survive.
The options:
Charles, Duke of Cambridge (b.1677) eldest son of James II and Mary of Modena, would be eleven when his father dies in 1688, and consequently more in tune with being raised by an Anglican regency.
James Francis Edward Stuart (b. 1688) second son of James II and Mary of Moden, would be born just after his father dies in 1688, and can be shaped accordingly.
William, Duke of Gloucester (b.1689) his birth would symbolise a success of the Glorious Revolution especially if he's born healthy and without any of the ailments that plagued him otl.
Your thoughts would be much appreciated.