The movie tended to portray Ismay as a arrogant blundering idiot, and a coward.Good luck convincing Bruce Ismay Titanic can sink, hence it needs more lifeboats.
Good luck convincing Bruce Ismay Titanic can sink, hence it needs more lifeboats.
The lifeboat issue was never raised within White Star. The philosophy that lifeboats were to be used to ferry passengers from one ship to another was reinforced with Titanic. As that is exactly what happened. The ships only carried a full complement of boats during the war years because the US Army just about had a collective heart attack at the thought of losing 1/3 of a division because the ship they were on was torpedoed. But this was a wartime specific reason. In peace time, there is still no reason that people can see for a ship to carry so many boats
I was thinking the Empress might be a candidate, but she sank ridiculously fast, and with a very heavy list.Right, so the stage is set for a nasty disaster. The worst I could imagine would be something like the Andrea Doria / Stockholm collision, only this time both ships are fatally injured, have larger passenger complements, and founder in around an hour. Add the nasty list that Andrea had after the collision to both ships, and half of the lifeboats are unusable.
Not that the writer may choose to go this way
It is quite possible.Is it really credible that the crew could have controlled the flooding in this way?
Is it really credible that the crew could have controlled the flooding in this way?
Is it really credible that the crew could have controlled the flooding in this way?
Even with all the lifeboats they would not have had time to launch them all in the Titanic's case ITOL.This is essentially the current thinking. The Board of Trade is considering making changes to lifeboat requirements, but feels under no pressure to do so.
One note here, during the war, the Olympic-class did in fact carry enough boats for everyone on board. They were equipped with 66 65 passenger boats, 6 40 passenger boats and 48 47 passenger collapsible boats.
The Titanic was designed to have boat space for all. White star said no. Oops
Even with all the lifeboats they would not have had time to launch them all in the Titanic's case ITOL.
I am, like Athelstane, unconvinced that fothering would allow them to save the ship, but in the interests of a good yarn always allow a few 'gimmes' in a timeline.
I'd be interested to see a TL where Smith (and Lightoller and Murdock) act much better but still lose Titanic. Fothering, closing the proper hatches and filling lifeboats (rather than Lightollers awful 'Women and Children ONLY' confusion) would save close to 1178 lives in the boats, and if the ship can be kept afloat until 3.30am or so, it would mean some of those in the water might be saved by Carpathia arriving shortly thereafter.
You'd also avoid a problem which I suspect is on the horizon in this TL, namely a worse disaster from naval regulations still not considering that you HAVE to have enough lifeboats for all crew and passengers on board. I suspect this time line is heading for a Wilhelm Gustloff (perhaps without the Soviets) in order to really shake things up.
Case in point BritannicTitanic stayed afloat for 2hrs and 40mins after hitting the berg. That was more than enough time to launch every boat on board had she been carrying all 64 her design originally called for. However no boats were launched till almost an hour after the collision. In the original post, the timeline for the boats being launched are the actual launching times from OTL.
A common misconception.The attempt to turn the Titanic to get away from the iceberg played a factor in dooming her. Had the engines either been thrown in reverse or full stop, the ship probably would have survived. It may have still collided with the iceberg but it would have been damaged as opposed to being fatally hurt enough to sink.