It certainly has, but "all good things..." and all. Full disclosure next weekend the "Main Story" ends and the Epilogue Chapter begins.It's been one hell of a ride... and can't wait to see the Jim Henson Farewell Bash.
Again, however, I do hope he accepts an Emeritus title - he deserves one.
And I appreciate the help. Mrs. Khan actually knows alot about Indian and Hindu culture (she's an 800-hour certified Yoga instructor that included some deep dives into the folklore and texts, including the Ramayana, that inform Yoga philosophy and practice) but it was good to check with an actual ethnic South Asian to make sure I wasn't wholly screwing up.As someone whoès ethnically Indian, I approve. I was even offered rewrites and feedback, though as I know squat about hindu culture and the Ravana I didn't have much to offer, save suggesting Salman Khan for a role.
Apu is an interesting example of a character that has seen the full range from beloved example of representation to hated ethnic stereotype. Plenty of Indian Americans were happy to see Apu in Springfield back in the '80s-2000s, and while he leans into some Funny Foreigner tropes, he was largely seen at the time a positive representation of a hard working, friendly, and a dedicated family man. It was later, particularly as he further Flanderized and South Asian Americans started to further integrate into professional fields and the Second Gen SAAs became more Americanized and lost the accent that he started to increasingly look like a bad, outdated stereotype. I think Harold and Kumar was the first time I saw Apu used negatively, and then the Internet took it up. Such is how society evolves.Obviously, we're seeing this from Sanjay's perspective... but here is something interesting - whilst Apu has been criticized by Indian-Americans or rather South Asian Americans OTL, he has quite a fandom in India itself (and he seems quite popular among first-generation immigrants), because he's among the few Indian characters on TV - and, for his time, wasn't a stereotype (he wasn't overtly submissive, defined by religion and was as flawed and quirky as everyone else).
Now, obviously, everyone experiences prejudice differently... and obviously, as a white guy, I cannot - and should not - speak for these groups - I am merely going by what I have heard from people of South Asian descent I have encountered.
In this case, Azaria's Hanuman has been hit by the same blowback, though as Sanjay notes it's often well meaning white folks making the complaints in this case.
That's a great point. I can see DAK and the Disney Conservation program jump on that.Well, if it takes being a "Disney animal sidekick" to make the Asian vulture crisis a bit more noticed ITTL (seriously, it just went unreported OTL), I'm glad Sanjay and co ultimately won out...
Yeah it was never intended as a serious suggestion even in universe. That and Desperately Seeking Sita (which made the Threadmark) or Ramayana (do doo da doo do). I decided to cut that line as a little too irreverent even for me.Fun fact: in an earlier draft it was suggested one title be Rama Lama Ding Dong. Yes it was rejected immidiately.
Yep. DAK in particular, going off of Naty's point, can be a good place for Asian Vulture conservation. I wonder if seeing walkaround versions of Rama and Ravana might be pushing some cultural norms, though, but I'm not the person to ask here.I can see Animal Kingdom, Disneyland/Magic Kingdom, EPCOT, and Disneytown London go nuts over this film with special promotions and walkarounds.
It's kind of been the Disney Formula since Snow White. Take a myth or legend or story and adapt it as a family friendly feature. The biggest thing here is that the source has some cultural and religious connections that can be hard to wave away. And to be clear, there are definitely going to be Hindus who condemn it as cultural appropriation and desecration. Unavoidable, really.I wonder if this approach will be solidified in future Disney films after the success of Heart of Ice, City of Gold, and Invincible.
Last edited: