I think that are world would be a bit more tolerant of muslims that much is clear. Also there wouldn't be a war. How do you think the world would be differen't?
I am not sure about a Bush second term.
I dunno, I rather feel the people who started loud muslim-bashing after 9/11 were the same people who were that way inclined anyway, they just felt more comfortable saying so afterwards.I think that are world would be a bit more tolerant of muslims that much is clear.
Which war?King of Hell said:Also there wouldn't be a war.
Democrats have never nominated a previously failed candidate since the war.
As for Hillary: you can take out all the scathing articles written about her predecessor (just switch the names and dates), and she declined to run for those reasons: ruthless opportunism, the dynasty trying to get back in after a single term's interval, etc.
*(I know I should remember the bloke's name, he is current POTUS after all, but I just can't for some reason, and can't be arsed to google)
I dunno, I rather feel the people who started loud muslim-bashing after 9/11 were the same people who were that way inclined anyway, they just felt more comfortable saying so afterwards.
Which war?
Iraq never had anything to do with Al Quaeda, so that war may well have found another excuse invented for it.
Howard Dean's big issue was the war in Iraq. ITTL there is no war in Iraq.Howard Dean is President, airport security is much less of a concern.