What would crusader Egypt look like, long term?

pasta wealth?
Frederick II had vast wealth from growing wheat in Sicilian slave plantations and selling pasta, a nutricious, durable and tasty food of which the Just Poets have sung. Hall&Oates:
I eat pasta, vasta, so full and yet so lonely,
But tell me,
where are the Italian Girls?
 
Frederick II had vast wealth from growing wheat in Sicilian slave plantations and selling pasta, a nutricious, durable and tasty food of which the Just Poets have sung. Hall&Oates:
I eat pasta, vasta, so full and yet so lonely,
But tell me,
where are the Italian Girls?
Ah yes, those great troubadors Hall & Oates, written about extensively by Froissart and Matthew Paris, regulars at Eleanor of Aquitaine's Court of Love.
 
I don't think a King of Egypt would be declared to begin with. It would just be integrated into the Kingdom of Jerusalem. While they could theoretically break off, that would mean forfeiting aid from the west, and would be discouraged by the Papacy. Plus, I think strong cultural and kinship ties would create a pretty strong hurdle for a hypothetical breakoff effort by a regional magnate.
I feel what’s very likely is some king declaring one of his sons KoJ and the other KoE, in which case there’s no grounds from anyone from Europe to complain. At any rate, I don’t think aid would be forfeited simply if the Egyptian barons broke off, as long as they didn’t go native and convert to another religion like Coptic Christianity.
 
Last edited:
Coptic was on the verge of dying by the 12th century, I'm not sure it can even be revived.
In eygipt you are probably right for most of eygipt, but an area that might but since southern eygipt is far from the crusader power base I imagine if the region is fully subdued then the crusaders would likely be relying on the assistance of the nubian coptic kingdoms to hold down southern eygipt (possibly with the assistance of the ethiopian copts if the crusaders can form a united christian front along the nial) in the areas directly administered by copts I think they may have a chance at rebounding. They should probably get at least as far north as
Aswan since Makuria achieved that on thier own unassisted in 1171 during the colapse of the fatimid dynasty so the crusaders causing a collapse in the north should create a similer power vacuum if not greater and if Makuria is assisted by ethiopia and the other nubian coptic kingdoms I would argue that Aswan may even be low balling how far the copts could push in the southern nail.
 
How would Islam be impacted if Egypt was conquered by crusaders? Considering that Islamic territory which in our timeline was contiguous from the Middle East to the Maghreb would be split by Egypt. I watched one video on the subject of Crusader Egypt. It posited that Islam would be weakened to such an extent that the Maghreb would likely convert to Christianity. Is the Christianization of the Maghreb a almost certain effect of a Crusader conquest of Egypt? In contrast to Egypt it should be easier for Maghrebi polities to retreat inland to lick their wounds, and then push the Crusaders into the sea. Muslims would still have some contact with each other despite the lack of a contiguous land connection. Traders would cross Egypt overland, and sailors would sail between Anatolia, the Levant and the Maghreb. Besides there would be some institutional reproduction of Islamic teaching domestically in the Maghreb.
 

Math

Banned
Can't see why not, though it might take a generation or two. After all, it wouldn't be changing religions, just moving into a different Rite - they would remain devout Catholics. And, in order to create legitimacy for the new Rite, I'm sure there would be some pressure from the Church itself to have them move over from the Latin Rite to the Coptic one.
the lusignan in cyprus disagree with you, they were for almost 300 years in control of cyprus which was a totally orthodox island, but at no time did they convert to orthodoxy, or to bizantine catholicism, I doubt any crusader king would do that., this would certainly be frowned upon by the pope, and also by other nobles in Europe, which could be a problem depending on which house is the king of egypt, not only that, But the conversion could be used by a nobleman to overthrow the king and seize the throne, especially if the papacy does not approve (something similar to the situation of Pedro I in Castile)

It's not impossible, but it would be very difficult to happen,
 
Last edited:
the lusignan in cyprus disagree with you, they were for almost 300 years in control of cyprus which was a totally orthodox island, but at no time did they convert to orthodoxy, or to bizantine catholicism, I doubt any crusader king would do that., this would certainly be frowned upon by the pope, and also by other nobles in Europe, which could be a problem depending on which house is the king of egypt, not only that, But the conversion could be used by a nobleman to overthrow the king and seize the throne, especially if the papacy does not approve (something similar to the situation of Pedro I in Castile)

It's not impossible, but it would be very difficult to happen,

Assuming that a Coptic Catholic Rite was formed, there would be no reason for the Pope to frown upon the Crusader Kings of Egypt for following it. First, said Rite would have the full support of the Pope and Church to help integrate the Coptic Christians into Catholicism; the Kings of Egypt would likely be encouraged to show it favor for this reason alone. Secondly, there would be no conversion on the part of the Catholic Kings because said Rite would be in full communion with Rome; it wouldn't be a seperate faith.
 
Long term? Muslim. The Crusader Elite were a tiny minority and over time they would assimilate. Converting to Islam and speaking Arabic.

thay or they get steamrolled by the Mongols
 
Last edited:

Math

Banned
Long term? Muslim. The Crusader Elite were a tiny minority and over time they would assimilate. Converting to Islam and speaking Arabic.
impossible, give me an example of a crusader noble converting to eastern christianity or islam,

the best example is cyprus the house of lusignan ruled an isolated orthodox island for almost 300 years and never converted or Even assimilating to Greek culture.

It is easier for a Crusader noble to convert to or favor an Eastern rite than Islam.
speaking Arabic
the plantagenet who were French Normans ruled England for years and still spoke French, with kings like Richard Lionheart speaking French as their first language., The non-European language that a crusader noble would speak would be Greek
 
impossible, give me an example of a crusader noble converting to eastern christianity or islam,

the best example is cyprus the house of lusignan ruled an isolated orthodox island for almost 300 years and never converted or Even assimilating to Greek culture.

It is easier for a Crusader noble to convert to or favor an Eastern rite than Islam.

the plantagenet who were French Normans ruled England for years and still spoke French, with kings like Richard Lionheart speaking French as their first language., The non-European language that a crusader noble would speak would be Greek
I can't because no crusader state survived.

The Plantagenets assimilated and the Crusaders spoke Arabic OTL, Eventually like the Plantagenets they would assimilate to their new land as they constituted a tiny minority. I'm talking generations
 

Math

Banned
I can't because no crusader state survived.

The Plantagenets assimilated and the Crusaders spoke Arabic OTL, Eventually like the Plantagenets they would assimilate to their new land as they constituted a tiny minority. I'm talking generations
the plantagenet assimilated in a country of the same religion, I find it quite difficult for a crusader king to convert to islam, he will not be isolated in a sea of muslims, even if they are a minority, He'll still be raised by Catholics, he'll still go to Catholic mass, he will still remain in contact with Europe like the lusignan of Cyprus, he will also have trade with Genoa and Venice
I can't because no crusader state survived.
Kingdom of cyprus And for nearly 300 years, and in no time did they convert or abandon their French culture for Greek culture., Even when the Lusignan took over the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia They not converted to Armenian Christianity if I'm not mistaken (The first Armenian king of the house of lusignan was Constantine II born Guy of lusignan).
 
the plantagenet assimilated in a country of the same religion, I find it quite difficult for a crusader king to convert to islam, he will not be isolated in a sea of muslims, even if they are a minority, He'll still be raised by Catholics, he'll still go to Catholic mass, he will still remain in contact with Europe like the lusignan of Cyprus, he will also have trade with Genoa and Venice

Kingdom of cyprus And for nearly 300 years, and in no time did they convert or abandon their French culture for Greek culture., Even when the Lusignan took over the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia They not converted to Armenian Christianity if I'm not mistaken (The first Armenian king of the house of lusignan was Constantine II born Guy of lusignan).
The Plantagenets were assimilated. Their only lasting effect being on the English language. And it is much easier to convert a people who are closer to you religiously than distinct. The Safavids were able to convert Sunni Persia to Shia through persecution, were they trying to convert Persia to Christianity it would be much more difficult.

And while it's true this hypothetical king would grow up Catholic he and his ruling elite would be surrounded by Muslims in every aspect of their day. Long term religious tolerance would be the only survival mechanism and long-term religious tolerance means converting.

Cyprus is much smaller than Egypt and it's much easier for a religious minority small elite to control a small country than a large diverse country like Egypt that borders other Muslim countries. You would have Mujahideen and roaming Sufi mystics doing their thing in the countryside among a religion that encourages Taqiyya when facing persecution.

But none of it matters because a Christian Crusader Egypt with ongoing instability and religious persecution probably isn't beating the Mongols in 1260 if that isn't butterflied away (and if it is some other invasion will eventually happen from the East.).
 
Last edited:
I am surprised we are bearly mentioning the Mongols assuming the crusaders unconquered the holy land halagu arrives circa 1260 and either gets defeated , the french get destroyed or crusader Egpyt becomes a vassal
 

Math

Banned
I am surprised we are bearly mentioning the Mongols assuming the crusaders unconquered the holy land halagu arrives circa 1260 and either gets defeated , the french get destroyed or crusader Egpyt becomes a vassal
this is interesting, let's say the crusader kingdom of egypt and jerusalem lasts until the mongols, when the mongols conquer persia and sack baghdad, this could have interesting effects on the muslim psyche of The time, Since Egypt and Jerusalem are in the hands of the Crusaders, and Persia is in the hands of the Mongols, there are no large Muslim empires/states left in the Middle East, apart from a few Turkish states in Anatolia, but of course that It depends on what the Byzantines will do in the meantime between the conquest of Egypt by the Crusaders and the arrival of the Mongols, May be the Byzantines reconquer more territories in Anatolia And some state in the hejaz and some states in the south of the arabian peninsula
 

Math

Banned
I am surprised we are bearly mentioning the Mongols assuming the crusaders unconquered the holy land halagu arrives circa 1260 and either gets defeated , the french get destroyed or crusader Egpyt becomes a vassal
the Crusaders would probably lose to the Mongols, but I think they would probably become tributaries/vassals of the Mongols, of course things will get very complicated when the Ilkhanate becomes Muslim
 
The Plantagenets were assimilated. Their only lasting effect being on the English language. And it is much easier to convert a people who are closer to you religiously than distinct. The Safavids were able to convert Sunni Persia to Shia through persecution, were they trying to convert Persia to Christianity it would be much more difficult.

And while it's true this hypothetical king would grow up Catholic he and his ruling elite would be surrounded by Muslims in every aspect of their day. Long term religious tolerance would be the only survival mechanism and long-term religious tolerance means converting.

Cyprus is much smaller than Egypt and it's much easier for a religious minority small elite to control a small country than a large diverse country like Egypt that borders other Muslim countries. You would have Mujahideen and roaming Sufi mystics doing their thing in the countryside among a religion that encourages Taqiyya when facing persecution.

But none of it matters because a Christian Crusader Egypt with ongoing instability and religious persecution probably isn't beating the Mongols in 1260 if that isn't butterflied away (and if it is some other invasion will eventually happen from the East.).
But wasn't the christian population of Egypt still very large and significant at that time? It would be easier for the crusaders to convert to the local christian rite (like others proposed here) than to become Islamic.
 
this is interesting, let's say the crusader kingdom of egypt and jerusalem lasts until the mongols, when the mongols conquer persia and sack baghdad, this could have interesting effects on the muslim psyche of The time, Since Egypt and Jerusalem are in the hands of the Crusaders, and Persia is in the hands of the Mongols, there are no large Muslim empires/states left in the Middle East, apart from a few Turkish states in Anatolia, but of course that It depends on what the Byzantines will do in the meantime between the conquest of Egypt by the Crusaders and the arrival of the Mongols, May be the Byzantines reconquer more territories in Anatolia And some state in the hejaz and some states in the south of the arabian peninsula
the only way i see for that to be plausible by 1260 is that the fourth crusade actually goes to Egypt and is successful the and laskaris takes the throne circa mid 1200s or 1210s even if 1204 did happen in 1241 the sultanate of rum was made to a vassal so no real power aside from who ever is ruling hejaz would exist i don't think Islam would be over but it would be time of crisis
 
the Crusaders would probably lose to the Mongols, but I think they would probably become tributaries/vassals of the Mongols, of course things will get very complicated when the Ilkhanate becomes Muslim
the Mongols were tolerant i don't know how much ( depending on the pod) 100 years to 80 years of crusader rule changes the local religion before the ilkhante becomes mulsim majority like in the otl
 
Long term? Muslim. The Crusader Elite were a tiny minority and over time they would assimilate. Converting to Islam and speaking Arabic.
Speaking Arabic? maybe. But then again, Arabs were once a minority in Egypt themselves, and they dislodged coptic in favor of Arabic after hundreds of years of rule. And the number of Europeans setting sail to Egypt would be orders of magnitude greater than to Jerusalem, as it's already filthy rich. You may as well see Italian, French or German permeate Egypt, if a crusader kingdom persists.

As for converting to Islam, very unlikely. Coptic Christianity was still the majority religion by the 11th century. With political and economic control wrested away from Muslim rulers, there'd be little to no incentive for either crusaders or copts to convert to Islam.
 
How would Islam be impacted if Egypt was conquered by crusaders? Considering that Islamic territory which in our timeline was contiguous from the Middle East to the Maghreb would be split by Egypt. I watched one video on the subject of Crusader Egypt. It posited that Islam would be weakened to such an extent that the Maghreb would likely convert to Christianity. Is the Christianization of the Maghreb a almost certain effect of a Crusader conquest of Egypt? In contrast to Egypt it should be easier for Maghrebi polities to retreat inland to lick their wounds, and then push the Crusaders into the sea. Muslims would still have some contact with each other despite the lack of a contiguous land connection. Traders would cross Egypt overland, and sailors would sail between Anatolia, the Levant and the Maghreb. Besides there would be some institutional reproduction of Islamic teaching domestically in the Maghreb.
Definitely not certain. The mountainous terrain of the Maghreb makes it harder to conquer and hold. Also, by this time its native Christian population is nearly gone.
And while Egyptian Muslims could flee to Arabia, Maghrebi Muslims have nowhere else to go (assuming Spain is reconquered), so they will have no choice but to fight on.
It's possible that Christian forces could capture the Maghreb, despite these factors, but I would think it is not that likely.

But the Maghreb could be isolated enough from the rest of the Islamic world (especially if the Levant remains in Christian hands) that it diverges even further linguistically than IOTL, and perhaps develops more distinctive local Islamic traditions.
 
Last edited:
Top