What would a reformist Anarchism have looked like?

Let's say that there is some POD in the 19th century, perhaps we kill Engels, perhaps Proudhon has a disciple who gives his teacher's ideas the sort of "scientific" gloss that helped make Marxism popular and Anarchism becomes the go-to ideology of the hard left while Marxism stays in the fringes. I'd posit that if that's the case eventually a reformist strain of Anarchism would emerge, just like Marxism had Social Democracy split off from it. What would that ideology have looked like?

I'll be drawing more on Proudhon, Kropotkin and Tucker here rather than people like Bakunin. Of course once you make Anarchism reformist enough it stops being Anarchism and becomes something else with Anarchist roots...

Some ideas:
-Perhaps they'd be called Syndicalists (without the "Anarcho" prefix as they wouldn't be any more radical than the Social Democrats overall) would be involved in politics as well as labor union activity. Perhaps a political party would be started by an anarchist-affiliated labor union that got tired of anarchist purism.
-Emphasize on devolving government to the local, federalism and perhaps New England-style town councils.
-Taxes based on the value of land (not the property on it) with a portion of this tax paid out in cash to the citizenry (a bit like Paine's ideas or OTL Social Credit ideas). This would replace support for the welfare state.
-Support for mutual banking and industrial co-ops.
-Hostility towards tariffs, patents and many forms of intellectual property.
-Pro labor union.
-Your standard basket of culturally libertarian ideas.
-Probably the closest OTL equivalent would be the left wing of modern European Liberalism like Det Radikale Venstre (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_Social_Liberal_Party) in Denmark (maybe, my knowledge of Danish politics isn't very deep at all).

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Really so diffused as "anarchism" that I'd call it something else entirely. Fabian-style Democratic Socialism?
Does your POD presuppose a specific country?
I'd think it would have Syndicalist underpinnings.
 
Last edited:
Really so diffused as "anarchism" that I'd call it something else entirely. Fabian-style Democratic Socialism?
Does your POD presuppose a specific country?
I'd think it would have Syndicalist underpinnings.

Yeah, once it becomes reformist it'd be something else entirely. Basically I'm trying to fill in the analogy:

Marxism is to Social Democracy as Anarchism is to ??? more than thinking about any specific TL. But it would probably make the most sense for the epicenter to be in France and for it to be Syndicalist.

However the basic idea would go like this:
1. Proudhon-style Anarchism is stronger and Marxism is weaker or non-existent. Probably the most parsimonious POD would be to have (*)Marx himself become an anarchist and make it more systematized and pseudo-scientific.
2. The First International Sticks around longer with the Proudhon and *Marx cooperating and perhaps sidelining Bakunin (or not).
3. Anarchist-affiliated/influenced labor unions become more widespread over the next couple due to less competition from Marxists.
4. The Anarcho-Syndicalist labor union organization eventually starts focusing more on bread and butter issues than Revolution! and becomes reformist enough to split with the purist Anarchists.
5. The quasi-Anarchist labor unions start running Syndicalist Party candidates that aren't really anarchists but who have a strong anarchist tinge and with a good deal of anarchist influence (sort of like there was a good bit of Marxist influence on the early UK Labour Party but it was never really a Marxist party).

What sort of platform would that kind of watered down anarchism consist of? I think it could do fairly well in France and Spain and have a good shot at establishing some kind of presence in surrounding countries. Perhaps it could do better in the States than Marxism/Social Democracy did with some Proudhonian ideas about banking etc. (if moderated) being something that you could integrate into American Populism or Canadian Social Credit ideas more easily than was the case with Marxism/Social Democracy. Maybe fairly weak in the UK and Germany?
 
There would probably be a significant lag between the building of a viable syndicalist movement and becoming "legal" enough to be able to start a political party. Decades? Europe is probably more viable for an earlier POD, as opposed to America. I'd think in either Germany or France (but then again, isn't that where Marx thought the most fertile ground for revolution was?)
Anyway, you might want to look at the history of Spain's anarcho-syndicalist movement C.N.T. for ideas of what your POD could look like. Granted, there were both Marxist & Bukuninist influences within it. But, like what happened in the CNT, I'd see a split between those who would want to create a reform party that would work within electoral politics & those that would stick to classic anarcho-syndicalist thinking.
 
Last edited:
Top