So if Charles Martel lost at Tours and Britian had been conquered by the Muslim world how would the British get on without their bacon and beer?
please note that I'm not trying to offend anyone or trying to be Islamophobic
When this sort of thing is raised I always tend to think that a Muslim Britain (or France, or Germany, or whatever) would come up with some extremely creative interpretation of halal that comes down to 'you're not allowed to eat pork or drink alcohol apart from these pigs and these drinks'.
They'd still be in for a rude surprise when the Vikings knock on the door.
Weren't they still pagan at the time? They'd probably become muslim if they converted in these circumstances.
Perhaps, but my point was they'd just be burning down mosques instead of abbeys until then. But if Constantinople remains Orthodox, then it could spread to the Vikings via the lands in the east.
IIRC, though it may be urban legend, Mead, made from *honey*, being neither grape nor grain, escaped such strictures...
Uh, vodka from spuds might draw a fatwah...
IMHO, a lot depends on whether Sunni or Shia factions are at top of hierarchy: One's dynastic, the other elected-- Or vice versa...
IIRC, the original Muslim equivalent of 'Pope' was murdered by Mongols, and there was (and is ?) no internationally accepted successor...
From Wiki-- ( Care: YMMV ;- )
Shadow Caliphate, 13th–16th centuries
1258 saw the conquest of Baghdad and the execution of Abbasid caliph al-Musta'sim by Mongol forces under Hulagu Khan.
When this sort of thing is raised I always tend to think that a Muslim Britain (or France, or Germany, or whatever) would come up with some extremely creative interpretation of halal that comes down to 'you're not allowed to eat pork or drink alcohol apart from these pigs and these drinks'.
I'd bet the well-known British penchant for tea would remain the same. Not so with other historical passions, for gin and whisky...
Uh, vodka from spuds might draw a fatwah...
A lot of Arabic words and lingo enter English.
*Poor Christian also had a lower infant survival rate thanks to loss of resources to Jizya, which are why the surviving Christian minorities of the Middle East to large extent either are middle class (whom could afford the loss of resources) or fill niches which are considered unclean by Muslims**.
Hrmm, is there any evidence for this? It sounds plausible, but I don't think people claim that Gaul became Romanized because of lower tax rates on Romans than Gauls.