What would a modern Byzantine empire look like?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay, let's say the Byzantines didn't fall in the Fourth Crusade, and so where in a better position to defeat the Turks or whoever else. What would a modern Byzantine empire look like?
 

Deleted member 67076

Best case scenario a superpower, worst case a respectable regional power.

No Fourth Crusade means a MUCH more powerful Byzantine state instead of what Nicea, Epirus and Trebizond were, that combined with the Mongols smashing the hell out of the Seljuks and their raids in the Balkans is going to give the Rhomaioi alot of breathing room. They'd probably be able to reconquer most of Anatolia and the Balkans in that century alone. It really depends on what happens next.
 
Surviving Byzantine Empire would mean very large butterflies and nearly unrecognsible world. History of Russia would be different. Ottomans would have different faith. No Ottoman invasion attempt to Central Europe. And probably founding of America delay few decades, perhaps even one century. Perhaps we see weaker Islam and stronger Mediterranean area. But it is impossible to say how important power Roman Empire would be or would it be absolute monarchy or would it transfer as constitutional monarchy.
 
Surviving Byzantine Empire would mean very large butterflies and nearly unrecognsible world. History of Russia would be different. Ottomans would have different faith. No Ottoman invasion attempt to Central Europe. And probably founding of America delay few decades, perhaps even one century. Perhaps we see weaker Islam and stronger Mediterranean area. But it is impossible to say how important power Roman Empire would be or would it be absolute monarchy or would it transfer as constitutional monarchy.

I wouldn't go that far, at all. Although there were be many, many, butterflies, we can look at the resources available in Greece and Anatolia, look at the population of this region, and extrapolate how strong the Empire might be in the *present. It can't be exact, of course, but arguments and discussion can still be made.

I see what your saying, its difficult, but there is no reason to assume that we can't come up with some arguments.
 
The main problem with going with what we know of OTL is that a surviving Byzantium greatly alters the situation in Anatolia compared to OTL.

Its not like we can't make some kind of guess, but it is going to take some work.

And a thing to note - while the Mongols hurt the Seljuk state, they didn't decrease - quite the opposite in fact - the number of Turks in Anatolia (long term at least). Or the Turcomen raiders, who are at least as problematic to Rhomania having "breathing room" as the Seljuk state.

Plus, with their other actions, they reinforced the Islamic component there as sufis and such from the east moved.

Its not to say that something can't be done - but a Byzantium having to go from what happened by 1204 on is going to be in a much weaker and more limited position than one with an earlier POD, even if avoiding 1204 makes a difference.
 
The main thing about a surviving Byzantium will be its strategic position, regardless of how much coal and iron resources she possesses for the industrial revolution. I also think she would be a major wine producer and French varietals will not have a stranglehold on new world wines.
 

Delvestius

Banned
I doubt it. The reason why Russia was so backwards was that they had a lack of contact with the West, where as Byzantium had quite a lot of contact.

Naw dude Russia was backwards because of their lack of warm water ports and urban middle class. Of course the few centuries of Mongol rule couldn't of helped... Distance from the west was a factor but not the sole one.

I agree with Basilius; The Orthodox church made Russia what it is today, and a modern Byzantine state could very well see the same tendencies.
 
On the other hand, I'm willing to bet we'll also see a lot of Italian influences - both direct (in the form of Italian minorities present throughout the empire's coastal cities) and indirect (trade, techniques, fashion etc), especially if there is no 1204.
 
Compared to what I expect from others on this site, I am substantially underinformed on this topic. So, my question is, do the Byzantines not only beat back the Otts but take over large portions of what eventually was the Ottoman Empire? Or are they largely a state encompassing modern day Turkey and Greece? Or Just Thrace, Greece, Cyprus and a few other Mediteranean Islands? Hard to imagine they would retain boundaries as of 1204.

It seems to me that they lose out to the Atlantic trade much the same way the Ottomans did. The English, Portugese, Spanish, and French were going to head west or South regardless of who held Constantinople. They probably industrialize better than the Turks did. Given the shared religious background, the rivalry in the black sea and caucuses might have been more peaceful than what the Turks encountered with the Russians during the 18th and 19th centuries.

Interested to read more or learn why any of these statements are ASB.
 
What's Byzantine Empire (or its successor state) in modern times?

Territory: Either OTL Greece, Cyprus and most of Turkey (except northeast and southeast) or OTL Greece, Cyprus and western coast of Turkey

Government: Federal constitutional monarchy.

Economy: Probably one of the most economically-important nation because of its location.

Language: Greek (obviously)

Media: Vibrant, as usual
 

Sulemain

Banned
If we keep the Byzantium Empire at the size it was under Basil II, then it's a regional power, and a low-tier super power.
 

Deleted member 67076

If we keep the Byzantium Empire at the size it was under Basil II, then it's a regional power, and a low-tier super power.

Even more if the empire pushes down the Levant and gets a port on the Red Sea
 

KaiserCorax

Banned
Possible maps

Byzantine-wank:

ZKJmC0O.png


More likely/less ASB version

fTj3OI3.png


Abysmal map of modern day Byzantium (essentially an Ottoman and Bulgarian wank):

KFPQgjF.png
 
Would/could the Byzantines take the role of the Portuguese and Dutch in the early trading/colonial period in the Indian ocean?
 

KaiserCorax

Banned
Would/could the Byzantines take the role of the Portuguese and Dutch in the early trading/colonial period in the Indian ocean?

Only if they had Egypt. Otherwise they have no entrance into the Indian Ocean, and the Catholic Spanish won't let them through.
 

Avskygod0

Banned
Something similar to this?

9FpN2Hy.jpg



Joking aside, it would probably be Modern day Greece+European part of Turkey and a part of Albania
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top