The main prerequisite for an industrialization is continuous multi-industry specific growth, general economic growth, a strong food supply, and an expanding consumer market. Note that I didn't use the word revolution which implies a violent and abrupt process, rather something gradual and incremental over centuries. The traditional pre-industrial limits was that often some improvement comes along such as mills, irrigation, or whatever and the population and per-capita income booms only to be lost later as the initial improvements lose momentum due to diminish returns to scale, population stagnates, per income capita declines, and eventually the population starves.
The first condition was a good and expanding food supply to feed worker specialization (non-farmers), a large enough market, and population growth. IOTL the lead up to
agricultural surplus for industrialization in England was caused by social and market forces where dietary preferences changed from a predominately grain diet towards a meat heavy diet; the results of which was the expansion of agricultural land to sandy light soils for cattle that was previously considered marginal lands and a large increase in the availability of manure aka the earliest manufactured fertilizer allowing civilization to push their environmental carrying capacity.
The next condition was market conditions that gives machine power and capital more value than labour. As seen in the first few decades of innovations such as weaving loom and automated spinners that machines replacing humans was a gradual process over decades, people can always depress their own wages and given enough prosperity can grow at absurd rates of 6% or more negating all benefits of better technology and pushing closer towards overpopulation. The market conditions needed are high income, good market penetration, limited population increase helps but is a relative factor to growth, and high demand for products giving capitalists profits and incentives.
The next condition was industry specific growth and general economic growth, in a weird way growth is required for growth to speed up and this needs to happen within a narrow time period. IOTL the reason industrialization took off in the 18th century vs the growth of the 12th century was that there was general economic growth spurring demand and investment aided by a cascade of multiple industry specific advances that generated growth and profits within such a narrow time period that multiple industries were gaining and waning in momentum at the same time producing overall aggregate growth.
In the end a good deal of the conditions are equally technology, social, and political; technology just happens to be the most visible part.