What if Japan somehow declared war 1 or 2 hours before the actual attack on Pearl Harbor?
Perhaps, before the Bataan Death March.What if Japan somehow declared war 1 or 2 hours before the actual attack on Pearl Harbor?
The problem that the Japanese embassy in Washington had was that the appointment to deliver the DOW was set for the same time as the attack but when they got the DOW it took them so long to translate it that they were very late for the appointment.What if Japan somehow declared war 1 or 2 hours before the actual attack on Pearl Harbor?
Would nothing have changed if the war declaration arrived on time on Cordell Hull's desk?The problem that the Japanese embassy in Washington had was that the appointment to deliver the DOW was set for the same time as the attack but when they got the DOW it took them so long to translate it that they were very late for the appointment.
Nope. The Japanese were fighting well outside their weightWould nothing have changed if the war declaration arrived on time on Cordell Hull's desk?
In addition, the atrocities at Bataan will still occur.Nope. The Japanese were fighting well outside their weight
Before Pearl Harbor.Peter Zeihan's first book, The Accidental Superpower, strongly implies in it's first chapter that, from the American perspective, total Japanese defeat was taken as a given by June 1944. Regardless of the military long-term projections available to the Americans at that point, what was the last time where the Roosevelt admin. thought it was politically viable to settle for less? Okinawa? Midway?
And arguably that didn't completely happen OTL either as continued Japanese revisionism and excuses continue to this day.
(It's taken me almost two months to get through three subtitled episodes of "Deep Blue Fleet" anime due to how much my blood pressure spikes on each episode )
I just read the Wiki page. Why do you do that to yourself?
What if Japan somehow declared war 1 or 2 hours before the actual attack on Pearl Harbor?
Never, even before Pearl Harbor the US had been pushing for an unconditional withdrawal from china. It was the subsequent oil embargo that forced japan to take the southern expansion path. To avert this would require a drastic change in US policy. Maybe no voice from the gutters and an isolationist Garner presidency? But US interest in china meant they would never really accept Japanese conquest.
Off-topic, but... could you recommend a good bio of the man? He's a person I keep meaning to read more about.look into Grant
I really enjoyed Grant by Ron Chernow.Off-topic, but... could you recommend a good bio of the man? He's a person I keep meaning to read more about.
That document wasn't a declaration of war, just a statement that further negotiations seemed unlikely to be successful.The problem that the Japanese embassy in Washington had was that the appointment to deliver the DOW was set for the same time as the attack but when they got the DOW it took them so long to translate it that they were very late for the appointment.
This was my first thought as well.We didn't even get it in OTL.
It's true that the Japanese ultimately agreed to unconditional surrender, but the the Potsdam Declaration was purposefully vague so as to give the Japanese leadership the necessary tools to sell peace to the military and general populace. The US was well aware through deciphered diplomatic intercepts that even the most peace-minded leaders in Japan considered the elimination of the imperial house to be unacceptable as it would likely trigger a military coup or widespread civil unrest. So when it gets down to it, the US deliberately accommodated Japan's primary condition when negotiating peace.That is not true. The commonly held belief that keeping the Emperor was a term of the eventual Japanese surrender is wrong. The Japanese surrendered unconditionally. The Allies decided to keep the Emperor afterward.