What other countries could rewrite their history with a 'Lost Cause Mythos' akin to the (Southern) US

If anything the opposite (exaggerations about "Buddhist genocide" or "Catholic minority rule") tends to be more common.
Not really, the Vietnamese Americans community tend to glorify Diem alot. They think that if the US hadn't overthown him, he could have smashed the communists.
 
The vietnamese american community isn't the diaspora, nor it it the political core, nor it is the competence.

But that mythos is present even in the scholarly work, even outside of obviously state sponsored works.
 
A while back, as an American living in Scotland, I was struck one day: "Oh, this is what the lost cause would look like if it wasn't racist garbage." The feeling is very similar, no offense to Scotland. And I always felt, due to the presence of a lot of Scots and Scots-Irish in the South, that it was probably drawn directly from the earlier Scottish independence romanticism.

And since the Scottish romanticism probably owes more to the Walter Scott-driven revival of about 60 years after 1745 (rather than direct nostalgia for 1745 itself), it even shares a not dissimilar timescale and time displacement phenomenon.
 
As the tin says: one generation after the American Civil War (Yes. That's post-1900. That's why I'm posting in this forum) the Southern states began propagating the 'Lost Cause': the idea that the soldiers of the Confederacy were not traitors nor rebels but well-meaning patriots morally at least equivalent to their Union counterparts. The reason they lost was because the South never really had a chance against the economic, technological and financial superiority of the North and the fact that many Confederates still signed up as soldiers even if their casuse was 'lost from the start' only enhanced their heroism.

Although I like to give the benefit of doubt and assume that the 'Lost Cause Mythos' opriginally was about giving Confederate veterans the same recognition their Union counterparts earned by actually winning the war, the movement quickly morphed into a celebration of the Confederate cause and it's values, in particular by white Americans.

It went on to provide a narrative for their post-emancipation systematic suppression of the African-American population and was used extensively to cement a new racism where the descendants of the former slaves were systematically denigrated into second-class citizens. Although originated in the former Confederate states, the movement/narrative/ideology quickly spread into the new territories that gained statehood after the Civil War and even found traction in some areas of the former Unionist states. And so by the end of the Woodrow Wilson presidency, in many parts of the country it felt that except for the abolition of official slavery, the South had won on every other level.

So here is the question. Could a narrative like this have existed in other nations, referring to other wars? Any situation where the 'bad guys' righeously lost, yet came back with a narrative that hot only freed them from the 'bad guys' label but also questioned the moral superiority of the winning side and laid the framework for many former excesses to continue in a slightly different form.

I know for some time in the late 1950's early 1960's an aspect of the West German re-militarization was the rebranding of several Nazi air, sea or tank aces as heroic soldiers, even if they were fighting for a morally bankrupt ideology, combined with a systematic glossing over of their battles with the Western allies in favor of their bravery on the Eastern Front against the Communists. This however did not go so far as to celebrate the Nazi extermination camp and the systematic reign of terror over the civilian population of the East. So arguably that was not a 'Lost Cause' in the strictest sense of the word.

I also hear that even today there are similar ideologies in Japan glossing over their atrocities in China, Korea and the Pacific in favor of the heroic deaths of their soldiers. Could that count even if it is not used to justify today's actions against Chinese or Korean nationals or businesses?

What other examples could be possible? a post-1945 Nazi-inspired France based on a lost cause narrative for the Vichy regime? A longer civil war in 1918/1919 Germany causing a 1930's resurgence of Communists or Emperor-worshipers even if their dreams of a new German nation were smashed in 1920? Elevation of former Nazi-sympathizers to independence heroes in regions with a strong seccessionist movement like Bretagne, French Basque, Slovenia, Croatia, Flanders.....

Your ideas, real life possibilities or Alternate History....
Rhodesia and South Africa today - in fact there is one.
Z
 

Orangecar

Banned
Rhodesia and South Africa today - in fact there is one.
Z
I have seen people spouting Rhodesian nostalgia on this board. So there is definitly a myth around that regieme. Even among old Rhodesians there seems to be nostalgia for the past. I once had a teacher, who was talking about his service in the military in Rhodesia and said that politics would be better if South Africa adopted the Rhodesian voting system( basically trying to say that blacks don't deserve the vote). I cannot stress enough that this was in a classroom in an elite mostly white South African achool where at least a 1/4 of the kids that day were not white.
 
I have seen people spouting Rhodesian nostalgia on this board. So there is definitly a myth around that regieme. Even among old Rhodesians there seems to be nostalgia for the past. I once had a teacher, who was talking about his service in the military in Rhodesia and said that politics would be better if South Africa adopted the Rhodesian voting system( basically trying to say that blacks don't deserve the vote). I cannot stress enough that this was in a classroom in an elite mostly white South African achool where at least a 1/4 of the kids that day were not white.
One thing I always find fascinating about SA and Rhodesia is that Britain leveled sanctions and denounced them any chance they got. When the father country and the one with some of the most horrid crimes against humanity under its belt decides that you've gone too far for too long, how can you possibly defend yourself?
 

Orangecar

Banned
One thing I always find fascinating about SA and Rhodesia is that Britain leveled sanctions and denounced them any chance they got. When the father country and the one with some of the most horrid crimes against humanity under its belt decides that you've gone too far for too long, how can you possibly defend yourself?
In the case of Rhodesia there a bizzare form of denial about what the British were doing. When the first democraric election took place many of them felt "betrayed" and "stabbed in the back", they couldn't comprehend why Britian might sanction a white minority ruled country because for them they couldn't comprehend why their way of life was problematic and thats why racism is so sinister.
I mean to us it seems obvious why those governments were satanically evil and vile but to them seeing blacks as their social and biological inferiors was a way of life, it was almost in the background of their lives, it was just the way things were. It was their way of life.
 
I don't know about A Lost Cause myth, but in Britain it's said "We won the war but lost the peace". We didn't lose the peace, we threw it away through union greed, managerial incompetence, governmental stupidity and a refusal to accept the world had changed. We didn't win the war either, we "Held until relieved".
 
I don't know about A Lost Cause myth, but in Britain it's said "We won the war but lost the peace". We didn't lose the peace, we threw it away through union greed, managerial incompetence, governmental stupidity and a refusal to accept the world had changed. We didn't win the war either, we "Held until relieved".
Basically this.

I'd phrase it as the "Gentlemanly Capitalism " elite being more focused on finance and other "invisible " services rather than Trade or Industry. With the government and civil service making these the priorities rather than fixing the structural problems that hindered industrial productivity. Management in industry (private or public sector) was incompetent and the Unions unwilling to accept changes to working practices as much as greedy. But the fundamental problem was the failure to tackle issues known about for 50 years or more.

Cultural as much as political. And, without going into current politics, there is something of a Lost Cause feel about the nostalgia for WW2. Spitfires and Vera Lynn, great though both were, are a bit too prominent in British symbolism.
 
While downplaying or totally ignoring Ho Chi Minh's and his successors own tyranny.
I don't think any people downplay Ho Chi Minh rule. The goverment "acknowledge" the mistakes of the land reform. And Ho Chi Minh is basically a figurehead after that. If he (or Vo Nguyen Giap ) was in charged, the war would diverge significantly from OTL. Not only that, but most western documentaries that I have watched never try to downplay it, so I don't know where you get that idea from (unless you've read Vietnamese history books)
 
Last edited:
I have seen people spouting Rhodesian nostalgia on this board. So there is definitly a myth around that regieme. Even among old Rhodesians there seems to be nostalgia for the past. I once had a teacher, who was talking about his service in the military in Rhodesia and said that politics would be better if South Africa adopted the Rhodesian voting system( basically trying to say that blacks don't deserve the vote). I cannot stress enough that this was in a classroom in an elite mostly white South African achool where at least a 1/4 of the kids that day were not white.
Rhodesia had a nonracial qualified franchise reminiscent of 19th century Britain except that women could qualify.
 
The closest we have in Portugal is the idea that portuguese colonization was benign and could have led to a multiracial "super Portugal" in Europe and Africa.
This is used to justify the colonial war in a revisionist narrative in which the liberation movements are puppets of foreign imperialism.
 

Germaniac

Donor
Rhodesia had a nonracial qualified franchise reminiscent of 19th century Britain except that women could qualify.

You can argue that so did the Jim Crow south in America...

Technically not meant to block people from voting based on race, but in practice exactly why it existed.
 
Top