Denkin was a benign autocrat. He didn’t share the anti Semitic ideas, of some of his underlings. He was no saint, but further along than the remainder.
Not really. He's been voted for people so that doesn't make him a "dictator".Still has quite little given Putin is clearly a dictator at his point.
Not really. He's been voted for people so that doesn't make him a "dictator".
in rigged elections, he jailed his opponent.Not really. He's been voted for people so that doesn't make him a "dictator".
One side is seen as God(a twisted racist pseudo religion's god under a personality cult) and voting against him is seen as treason.Always remember that North Korea technically has elections
...
However, one IS a very real possability, and Russia by default has so much internal pressure that its surface cracking and splintering into said warlord states would be the default if they're not forced together by outside forces and attention until it can be stabilized and domestic tensions cooled. Are Britain, France, and Japan willing to put aside their individual differences and ambitions and dedicate the resources nessicery to avoid the collective problem of a giant blob of chaos stewing in and sending bursts of instability throughout the centeral Eurasian landmass?
What would he do if he was in power???? It'd be ironic if Russia fell to a "Slavic pseudo fascism" and Germany went Communist at some point.Denkin was a benign autocrat. He didn’t share the anti Semitic ideas, of some of his underlings. He was no saint, but further along than the remainder.
Hitler was Freemason and so was Stalin. Even if White Russians won, Hitler would've still risen to power since he was supported by Freemason elite.
That's not true at all. Hitler hated the Freemasons with a burning passion. To quote Mein Kampf: "To strengthen his [i.e., the Jew's] political position, he tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance—and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry, and never need to suspect what is happening." Once in power the Nazis banned Freemasonry in every country they occupied, and 80,000-200,000 Freemasons were killed by the Reich (although Freemasonry wasn't the sole reason many of these people were arrested).Hitler was Freemason and so was Stalin. Even if White Russians won, Hitler would've still risen to power since he was supported by Freemason elite.
That's not true at all. Hitler hated the Freemasons with a burning passion. To quote Mein Kampf: "To strengthen his [i.e., the Jew's] political position, he tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance—and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry, and never need to suspect what is happening." Once in power the Nazis banned Freemasonry in every country they occupied, and 80,000-200,000 Freemasons were killed by the Reich (although Freemasonry wasn't the sole reason many of these people were arrested).
Stalin also wasn't a Freemason. In order to join the Freemasons one must profess belief in a "Supreme Being" (although Freemasonry is nondenominational). Stalin was an atheist, so he would be ineligible for membership. The Bolsheviks also shut down all Freemason lodges following the October Revolution, and it wasn't until the fall of the Soviet Union that Masons could legally operate in Russia.
Oh, do tell!Hitler was Freemason and so was Stalin. Even if White Russians won, Hitler would've still risen to power since he was supported by Freemason elite.
What separates an extremely powerful elected leader (like the US presidency) from a dictator is how free and fair the election is.
Their propaganda does a good job of spelling that outProbably like a more brutal version of Czardom given the likely purges. Probably significantly worse than Latin American style dictatorships, but less genocidal than Nazism. Though that depends on where they fall on their views on Jews.
There've been more than a few "Communist Germany Fascist Russia" scenarios in this forumWhat would he do if he was in power???? It'd be ironic if Russia fell to a "Slavic pseudo fascism" and Germany went Communist at some point.
Yeah, the Jewish-Bolshevik propaganda didn't start with the Nazis, they actually were influenced by the White Russian narratives.Their propaganda does a good job of spelling that out
View attachment 374785
There was extreme antisemitism amongst the ranks of the Whites. Their pogroms killed 50,000 people in what was known as the "White Terror". I think we'd get a Holocaust out of this.Yeah, the Jewish-Bolshevik propaganda didn't start with the Nazis, they actually were influenced by the White Russian narratives.