I'm not saying Hitler was pursuing war with the West. I'm saying that annexing Czechoslovakia was counterproductive for avoiding it. Hitler wanted above all else a war with the Soviet Union, undisturbed by the Western Allies. Would Germany have been in a worse economic situation if they hadn't annexed it? Sure, but they also would not have found themselves staring down the barrel of an Anglo-Franco-Polish alliance. If you want to fight the Soviet Union eventually, it makes more sense to not annex Czechoslovakia, and to convince the Polish government that if they don't hop on board, they will be partitioned with the Soviets. The Polish government's biggest mistake in the aftermath of Munich was failing to discern that they would have to pick a side, or be invaded by both.He was in persuit of war is true, though I disagree it would be in persuit of a war with the West, or specifically that annexation of Bohemia Moravia only made sense in persuit of war with the West. As for the economy, the economy absolutely experienced a downturn on the Ruhr, I believe in terms of coal extraction, in the first quarter of 1939. Whether it would lead to collapse, would it lead to collapse, probably not, but Hitler was working without the benefit of hindsight, he annexed the rump, took the gold, reorganised the industries, and it seems to have bought him time. As for Hitler himself, it's possible that Scheubner-Richter living after the Munich Putsch could push Hitler to more grand strategy, or perhaps some other POD can do it, you don't necessarily need to remove him.
At any rate, Munich more or less brought the Balkans into Germany's economic orbit, with the clear economic benefits that entailed.
Last edited: