What is proper for reposting a timeline?

Hi all,

So my Corn Fields and Longhouses timeline died out because it turned out I had no access to a computer for a long time. I enjoyed writing the timeline and I think it was some of my best work, so I'm wondering what the form for reposting it is. Do I not bother with the Before 1900 forum, finish the timeline, and post it in Completed? Or could I repost the previous writing in the comments forum here?

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Dnapo

(If this belongs in a different forum, please tell me or move it)
 
If you want, i guess you can restart when you want with a new thread.

If i understand correctly the forum rules, a thread is declared dead after 6 months of inactivity.
 
If you intend on continuing work on the timeline, I think your best bet would be to put in Before 1900 (for purposes of getting feedback and constructive criticism). I wasn't sure if that was your intention based on the info you provided, but I think that's what you were trying to get at.
 
Just entitle it 2.0 and reedit it, adding a bit here, refining a bit there. You can always make it a little better and then you can justify a new thread.
 
If i understand correctly the forum rules, a thread is declared dead after 6 months of inactivity.

If it is, that's fine. CFaL has only been down for around a month now. I'll look it up, just to make sure, and if it's right I'll bump it with a new segment.
 
If it is, that's fine. CFaL has only been down for around a month now. I'll look it up, just to make sure, and if it's right I'll bump it with a new segment.

I think that's the right thing to do. I've had a similar situation with my TL; I started it, it died because I was too busy to work on it, then I restarted it as a "2.0" version in a new thread. On the 2.0 version, I've gone as long as two months without updating it, and no one has ever accused me of necromancy when I've bumped it. I get the sense people are pretty tolerant of TL authors resurrecting their own threads.
 
I once bumped a year-old thread with a well-reasoned addition, and no one objected. Of course, hardly anyone answered, either...:(
 
Top