Indeed, as funny as a spaniard Bob Semple would befor example, if ITTL New Zealand is colonized by the Spanish instead of the English, there's no way you are going to get the same people there.
Indeed, as funny as a spaniard Bob Semple would befor example, if ITTL New Zealand is colonized by the Spanish instead of the English, there's no way you are going to get the same people there.
He should be called "Roberto Simplón"Indeed, as funny as a spaniard Bob Semple would be
I think a surviving flourishing Christian population in Japan would have separate institutions from the Shinto-Buddhist population but I think the Christians can take advantage of the decline of the Shinto-Buddhist population if they play their cards well.I think the Japanese Christians and the Shinto-Buddhist Japanese would be considered as separate Ethnoreligious group from each other if the Christians survive and thrive there similar to Croats and Serbs, Copts and Egyptians, and Flemings and Dutch and they would have different culture from each other as well.
What exactly would cause the Shinto-Buddhist population to decline, and why exactly would it not affect the Christian population?I think a surviving flourishing Christian population in Japan would have separate institutions from the Shinto-Buddhist population but I think the Christians can take advantage of the decline of the Shinto-Buddhist population if they play their cards well.
They are facing a decline IOTL in the present and the Christians can take advantage of that decline due to a different culture if the decline still exists.What exactly would cause the Shinto-Buddhist population to decline, and why exactly would it not affect the Christian population?
The problem is that Christianity is also experiencing a decline at the same time, so to "take advantage" you would have also to eliminate the decline of Christianity as well.They are facing a decline IOTL in the present and the Christians can take advantage of that decline due to a different culture if the decline still exists.
I agree on that.The problem is that Christianity is also experiencing a decline at the same time, so to "take advantage" you would have also to eliminate the decline of Christianity as well.
Best way to do that is to prevent the fall of Constantinople in 1453.The problem is that Christianity is also experiencing a decline at the same time, so to "take advantage" you would have also to eliminate the decline of Christianity as well.
Another way to prevent the fall of Christianity is to prevent the American Revolution as the Church and State being united will become the norm.Best way to do that is to prevent the fall of Constantinople in 1453.
I mean, the separation of Church and State was already starting even before the American Revolution. The rise of Enlightenment ideals in Europe, Martin Luther and the waning power of the Catholic Church were well in motion by this point.Another way to prevent the fall of Christianity is to prevent the American Revolution as the Church and State being united will become the norm.
But there will be no precedent of removing the control of the Church and the Monarchy in Europe if there was no American Revolution, so the French Revolution will be more difficult to justify in this timeline.I mean, the separation of Church and State was already starting even before the American Revolution. The rise of Enlightenment ideals in Europe, Martin Luther and the waning power of the Catholic Church were well in motion by this point.
Not necessarily...But there will be no precedent of removing the control of the Church and the Monarchy in Europe if there was no American Revolution, so the French Revolution will be more difficult to justify in this timeline.
No idea because I haven't gotten to that part yet, but a summary would help.How does LTTW handle this?
I've never been able to find the right mood for initially reading the story enough to make it my primary focus long enough to get through to the end. I honestly barely know anything about it but the basic premise of the story.How does LTTW handle this?
I would actually say that the United States was a negative influence in the sense of being the most openly and stridently religious of the Western powers during the 19th and 20th centuries. So there is no guarantee that there is a correlation between the decline of religion and the existence of the United States of America.I do qgree you need a POD before the American Revolution, but I dont think the US independence itself did impact christian influence that much despite being a secular state since it was still a majorly christian country that still featured references to God everywhere within its system("In God we trust" and all of that), I think the French Revolution was far more devastating to it due to the De-Christianization of France considering the fact that France was seen as the heart of Roman Catholicism and its model of Secularism deeply affected the others(including the american one)
Yeah, if anything America delayed the decay of religious influence for quite a while before it too went secular in the late 20th centuryI would actually say that the United States was a negative influence in the sense of being the most openly and stridently religious of the Western powers during the 19th and 20th centuries. So there is no guarantee that there is a correlation between the decline of religion and the existence of the United States of America.
It's kind of hard to remember that when 40+ Presidents and several hundred, probably thousands, of American officials including Congressmen, Senators, Secretaries of Federal Departments, Judges of all Courts, Sheriffs, Generals, Admirals, etc., covering virtually every branch and scale of the American civil service...The United States of America has been secular since its foundation... its citizens and what they do, on it's supposed behalf, of their own accord, is another story entirely o__O