What if Yugoslavia brands itself as *more* revolutionary than Moscow, not less, for at least a decade after the Cold War.
In OTL they maintained or increased leftish rhetoric for awhile after the split, and remained strident on the Trieste issue, however, the Yugoslavs were still taking aid from the west in 1949 and moderating domestic policies from the early 1950s on.
What if instead Tito went in the direction of increasing domestic radicalism, and commitment to world revolution in general, and support for the Greek communists in particular, and chided Stalin for weakness vis-a-vis the west?
In OTL they maintained or increased leftish rhetoric for awhile after the split, and remained strident on the Trieste issue, however, the Yugoslavs were still taking aid from the west in 1949 and moderating domestic policies from the early 1950s on.
What if instead Tito went in the direction of increasing domestic radicalism, and commitment to world revolution in general, and support for the Greek communists in particular, and chided Stalin for weakness vis-a-vis the west?