Assuming it was a Harrier FRS1, (Sea Harrier, the most likely opponent as both were carrier based in the main), then I think the Sea Harrier would have the edge. Mostly down to the pilots, although I believe the Sea Harrier had better radar, (happy to accept correction).Yak-38 or Yak-144 vs Harrier
It dependes on the cargo - volcanic ash might clog or damage the engines, although why anyone would be carrying it by air would be a mystery to me. Meanwhile, a well-placed jeep or pallet load of tinned mutton - both rather more likely cargo than ash - would require good timing and Hollywood levels of luck to hit, but would certainly be hard to ignore and likely to be very destructive.IL-76 comes across a C-17, could one down the other by theoretically dropping their cargo on top of the other?
I think I'm going to have to give this to the Il-76 for one simple reason.IL-76 comes across a C-17, could one down the other by theoretically dropping their cargo on top of the other?
I know this whole thread has many hand waves in it, but weren't the F104s supposed to go to the central front to support 5th air division and the CF5s were to go to Norway during the transition to war?I’ll bite..
Canadian based CF104’s or CF5’s against anything the Soviets might have been able to send their way.
(I seem to recall reading that the Canadians considered their home based CF104’s and CF5’s as having some utility as emergency air defence air craft..)
As I under stand things the CF5 didn’t have a radar and the radar on the CF104 wasn’t setup for air to air use ? I don’t know if / when they received Aim9’s but presumably they would at least have had guns and could have used radios to get GCI info from NORAD. Assuming it was daytime and the weather was reasonably clear I suppose the pilots could have seen large multi engine air craft from far enough away to be able to get into a firing position ? The tail turrets of their likely opponents might have proven troublesome ?
I realize Canada had other interceptor aircraft with radars and missiles(and rockets) prior to getting their F18’s.
As I understand things…I know this whole thread has many hand waves in it, but weren't the F104s supposed to go to the central front to support 5th air division and the CF5s were to go to Norway during the transition to war?
F-8 crusader of French navy vs Libyan mirage V
No there was the Northrop P61 Black Widow and I think a well flown Defiant could take it in a dogfight.Defiant vs Roc.
The two best [1] production turret fighters of WW2 in a battle for air supremancy!
[1] as far as I know, the only two production turret fighters of WW2, but also the two best.
The Defiant was slower and had no forward firing weapons. 304 mph and 8 minutes to 15,000ft.No there was the Northrop P61 Black Widow and I think a well flown Defiant could take it in a dogfight.
View attachment 928706
That's interesting mate, I assumed that the voodoo were sufficent to cover the CONUS AD task.As I understand things…
During parts of the Cold War Canada forward deployed CF104’s to Europe and Canadian based CF104’s were used for training and other tasks.
During parts of the Cold War Canada planned to send two squadrons of CF5’s from Canada to Norway and also had other CF5’s based in Canada.
Presumably at least some CF104’s and CF5’s were expected to remain in Canada ? It also occurs to me that in addition to emergency air defence roles there may also have been at least a notional CAS and or Reconnaissance role to support any ground forces that remained in Canada ?
To be fair I only recall reading one reference in a Canadian Govt Publication regarding a possible Emergency air defense role for Canadian based CF5's and CF104's. I have no idea how much emphasis was actually put on that role.That's interesting mate, I assumed that the voodoo were sufficent to cover the CONUS AD task.
Would be interesting to find out one way or another 👍😀