alternatehistory.com

In a Time Weekly article dated March 25, 1940, then Prime Minister Nevile Chamberlain said in a two-minute terse speech in the House of Commons that somehow, someway Britain would have sent men had Finland asked for them. During the debate, David Lloyd George replied to the PM, "It is old trouble--too late. Too late with Czechoslovakia, too late with Poland, certainly too late with Finland. It is always too late or too little or both, and that is the road to disaster."

That article forced me to take a second look at this situation.

What if Britain did send troops or at least pilots and planes to aid Finland against Russia?
I think it's not really far fetched idea since from the tone of the news articles during this period, it looks as if the USSR was also being lumped in with Hitler as an aggressor state. (It was only after Germany invaded the USSR that the view changed.) The only problem would be where the British would find the troops.

Would Germany still had invaded if the Russians were engaged against the English? (The enemy of my enemy is my friend is one saying that comes to my mind).

Could Germany, with Russian help, mount Operation Sea Lion successfully?
Personally, I doubt any German cross-channel invasion even with Russian help succeed, but the air war over Britain would've surely been altered. Russia might not send ground troops to Hitler's side but it's feasible to have Russian pilots, crews, and aircraft join Germany in a bombing campaign against "meddling Britain."

One more thing, I would view the alliance between Germany and Russia as more of an alliance of convenience. Once there common foe is gone, Stalin and Hitler would likely look for a chance to stab the other's back.
Top