Do you understand how far you've sunk? You've reduced yourself to citing alternate history fiction instead of historical fact.
I was under the impression this forum was for discussing possible alternate histories. IE if Rommel had been victorious at Normandy or had surrendered X, Y, or Z might have happened differently. Obviously there is going to be different very different opinions about how the Western Allies might have responded, how Stalin might have responded, and how the Germans might have responded and isn't that the whole point.
The fact is no one can say for total certainty what would have happened if X, Y, or Z had happened differently. Its all opinion, none of these alternate histories are historical fact. My point was that there are very different legitimate opinions then yours or mine about what might have happened if events transpired differently in late 1944.
Those books had no plausibility
I did have real problems with aspects of the books and there were certainly (what I felt were quite OOC moments) such as Rommel being shocked (and breaking down emotionally) at finding out about the mass murders of civilians the SS were carrying out after re-entering Germany with the Allies.
The reality is after returning from Africa in late 1943/early 1944 Rommel found out from his intelligence sources that the SS and Waffen SS were carrying out mass killings of civilians. Rommel's son as one can see from his own words below believed him finding out about the Final Solution via his intelligence sources is what allowed him to cross the mental Rubicon and support high treason against the Nazi Party.