What could had happened if Robert Stanfield menaged to beat Pierre Trudeau in the Canadian elections of 1972? Or even in 1968?
Coriolanus said:Wasn't he a member of the Conservative Party? If so, and if he was as loved by many people as I think he was, then it may mean something far different from the Canadian politics we've been used to.
The correct term is premier. He was premier of Nova Scotia.Stéphane Dumas said:Yes, Robert Stanfield was a member of Conservative party as well as once Prime Minister of Nova Scotia before doing federal politics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Stanfield
Valamyr said:As controversial as P.E Trudeau is around here, theres no doubt that for better or worse, he's the only reason Canada has been kept in one piece. Lévesque was an incredibly charismatic independentist, and his only match was Trudeau. Any other canadian premier would have been the last.
This obviously isnt his only legacy, but it's his most enduring. His other efforts, such as his attempts to federalize natural ressources, namely albertan oil, were undone by the next government.
No Trudeau would probably mean an independent Quebec in the early 80s, the Constitution still being in London and a few other social changes.
Few impacts on the rest of the world, i think.
No Trudeau would probably mean an independent Quebec in the early 80s, the Constitution still being in London and a few other social changes.
Few impacts on the rest of the world, i think.
DuQuense said:A indepentant Quebec, Canada in Peices, Annexxation Parties both in the Provinces & in the US.
You don't think this has Impacts arould the World