alternatehistory.com

What if Molte had not altered the Schlieffen plan.

First, yes there are doubts about wether it was a serious plan, or an interesting theoretical excercise, by Schlieffen. It may be he never intended it as a serious proposition. Doubts about this stem partly from the lack of logistical planning by Schlieflen.

The plan was mooted at a point where Russia was weak after the Manchurian war, and may have been originally intended as a one front war plan.

The bulk of the German army was to draw up along the Belgian Dutch border. There was to have been no ultimatum to Belgium. It was thought the French having to take countermeasures, would respond by occupying the naturally defensive ground in the Meuse valley south of Namur. Thus France is drawn into being the first to violate Belgian neutrality. Moltkes ultimatum to Belgium - in the hope that Belgium would be cowed, thus speeding the movement of the right hook through Belgium - prevented such a diplomatic coup.

Liege was originally to have been softened up by heavy artillery, Moltke changes this, removing the preparatory siege by artillery, with
capture by a swift speedy attack. As events occured the swift attack on Liege stalled, and siege artillery had to be bought up, as originally
intended. This caused a 12 day delay in the capture of this important cross roads/communications terminal.

The extreme right of the German army was intended to march through Southern Holland. Schlieffen and others considered it possible the Dutch might consent, to German troops moving through Southern Holland. Liege would be threatened from the rear. Moltke disagread, he thought the Dutch would not consent, he also questioned the logistical practicality of marching an army through Southern Holland.

The removal of 5 corps forming the extreme right, allowed the Belgians to withdraw to Antwerp and to destroy Belgian railway lines as they
went. This extreme right would have threatened the channel ports, and throws into question the course of the BEF. It may have withdrawn
North West in order to cover the Channel ports. Therefore being unavailable to play it's part in the counterattack that saved Paris.

In the original plan German forces in Alsace-Lorraine were to withdraw towards the Rhine. The main weight of the French army would be
pulled and encourged East, away from the point of decision, which would be to the West of Paris. At some point the German forces in AL
would counterattack to pin the French forces south of Metz, preventing them from being able to intervene against the enveloping of Paris
from the West.

Molte was against allowing the French to advance in AL, instead he strenthened the German forces in AL at the expense of
the Right wing in Belgium. Rather than withdrawing in AL, Moltke had the German forces attack from AL, thereby driving the French forces
south of Metz towards the point of decision, rather than as Schlieffen intended, drawing them away from Paris towards the Rhine.

The original Schlieffen plan, described by some as the revolving door trap, was changed by Molte into a pincer. but one that drove the
French towards Paris, rather than encircling them.

Lets suposse............

Dealing with the Dutch army, tiny and outdated, if the Dutch had protested against the violation of there neutrality, well they can
only withdraw to Amsterdam, they have no ability to attack the German right wing.

It is unlikely Liege holds out as long as it does, the Belgians are prevented from withdrawing to Antwerp, which falls quickly to the German right wing. Likewise the stand at Namur is outflanked from the north and West. The Belgian army might disintegrate, or be flung into a South Westerly retreat, that takes it out of Belgium, Belgium being totally over run may now surender.

What does the BEF do, does it cover the Channel ports, or withdraw south to keep contact with the French 5th army. If the Right wing Schlieffen envisaged, is moving through Northern Belgium, the BEF may not be able assemble at Amiens, and may be forced into a pocket around the Channel ports.

Hard to see Paris not falling in this scenario.
That of course does not mean a French surrender.
Top