1939, WW2 breaks out, and...
... Gochoson is banned for linking to a hate site and being a troll.
Last edited:
1939, WW2 breaks out, and...
The delivery system would require attention. Aircraft or a submarine-lauched cruise missile.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t374270-4/
"The truth is Hitler was not tough enough in the end. I mean he felt a kinmanship toward the Brits and allowed 300,000 British soldiers to escape. He put the Jews in camps complete with showers, kitchens, beds and recreation. Be nice to the enemy and see where it gets you."
I have no idea which battle was it.
Were there SSGs in WWII?
That was Dunkirk. And Hitler did not let them escape. The Luftwaffe tried to destroy them but were held off long enough for the Royal Navy to evacuate everyone. If they think that the land forces could have smashed the BEF, excuse me while I laugh. The supply lines were far too long, that three day delay before Dunkirk fell was necessary to allow the supplies to catch up.
If Japan had nukes, there is no way many cities could be hit. Chinese cities or military positions could be hit, Bejing will not be since it is controlled by the Japanese at this time. Soviet cities will not be hit since the Soviet Union did not enter the war against Japan until 1945. Their best be would have been to hit as much of the U.S. carrier fleet as possibe.
In the end they lose anyway, when the Americans strike back with their own atomic bombs in retaliation.
Nukes againts ships? What a waste of rescoures.
Nukes should be used againts BIG land targets - like cities and military bases. The bigger the better.
Nukes against single ships are a waste, against an entire fleet, is not.
Nukes against single ships are a waste, against an entire fleet, is not.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t374270-4/
"The truth is Hitler was not tough enough in the end. I mean he felt a kinmanship toward the Brits and allowed 300,000 British soldiers to escape. He put the Jews in camps complete with showers, kitchens, beds and recreation. Be nice to the enemy and see where it gets you."
I have no idea which battle was it.
I saw this documentory on History channel...
... History Channel is a valid source for info ...
First generation nukes against a fleet - unless you nuke the port it happens to be sitting in - are a waste too. Don't confuse the power of nuclear with thermonuclear weapons or even the power of Little Boy with the Able and Baker test shots.
Anyway, it's best to let this thread drop as the OP is nothing more than a troll. Along with employing a 4Chan vocabulary, he committed a banning offense almost immediately, originally asked a Done to Death(tm) question, and has asked baiting questions since.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t374270-4/
"The truth is Hitler was not tough enough in the end. I mean he felt a kinmanship toward the Brits and allowed 300,000 British soldiers to escape. He put the Jews in camps complete with showers, kitchens, beds and recreation. Be nice to the enemy and see where it gets you."
As for whether the use of a first-generation nuke against a fleet is valuable, it's debatable.
Operation Crossroads, a nuclear test by the US against a small fleet of target ships, used 23 kiloton bombs, and was reasonably destructive.
It would be better to hit an invasion force, though, because that way the radiation would affect invading soldiers in addition to sailors.