Are this statements a joke? Have you never heard of Magnus Erikssons
Landslag?
As a matter of fact I have not. And since the only internet sources I can find on said document are in German or Swedish (languages I know nothing of), you'll have to enlighten me.
The majority of the population in almost every Hispano-American country is Mestizo, generally native with some white and black heritage mixed in, whereas in Anglo-American countries only a tiny number of natives survive, herded onto reservations. Quechua, Aymara, Nahuatl, Guarani and the Maya languages count their speakers in millions.
The essential purporse of most Spanish colonies was, originally, to make Conquistadors rich in gold and silver. You need people to mine the gold and silver, and the Catholic church also wanted to publish material in native languages to evangelise. Whereas the essential purpose of the British colonies was to make settlers rich in land, which requires other people being cleared off the land.
You're kidding me, right?
Why are there so many mestizos in Latin American countries? Oh, I'm sure the Natives were more than happy to just let the Spanish walktz right in and take whatever they wanted. A happy cultural exchange occurred starting with the tearing down of racial borders and Spanish men falling in love with Native beauties.
Dude, they were called Conquistadors for a reason. Yes, the Spanish needed labor, so they enslaved the Natives on their own land. In the former Inca Empire they sent hordes of people to Potosi to mine silver going directly to Spain. The Catholic Church tore down ever idol from Lima, melted it down, and sent it back to Spain. Of course, European diseases wiped out far too many of the Indians to really help some, so the Spanish purchased thousands upon thousands of African slaves to help keep their economy going long before the first cotton plantation in Dixie. I'm sure that was less-than-humane treatment.
After gold mining became a lower industry, life on a sugar plantation was probably the one place in the western hemisphere less enjoyable than life on a tobacco or cotton plantation. The class based system wasn't new to the Natives, but the new racial based hatred certainly was. The Natives were able to keep alive their language and culture because many of them were able to escape into the mountains with nothing of value. While they're not official reservations, they might as well be. Modern values and economics don't really serve the modern Latin governments well to bother the tribes, nor do they really wish contact with the outside world.
As for most Latin Americans, trace the ancestry far enough, it's mostly Spanish mixed with Native blood. Most of it is non consensual. And there reaches a point where you eventually get ancestors who are pure Indian and pure Spaniard. It's really not that far back in the ancestry. My grandfather is a steady mixture of Taino and African as far as I know. My grandmother's bloodline is basically Spaniard.
I'm not calling the English moral bastards when it comes to Indian Affairs. But they were the ones issuing the Proclamation Line of 1763 while the Spaniards had no such restrictions on what colonists could and couldn't do to the Natives.