Would he be tried for wars crimes? Or would he be a officer for the JMSDF by 1954 just like how Minuro Genda became third Chief of Staff of the JASDF? Or would he run for politics such as the Diet?
This is before 1900's forum, you'll want to have the mods move this to the other one.Would he be tried for wars crimes? Or would he be a officer for the JMSDF by 1954 just like how Minuro Genda became third Chief of Staff of the JASDF? Or would he run for politics such as the Diet?
Oh my bad. I didn't realize that I posted into the wrong sub boards. @CalBear request to change to After 1900 please.This is before 1900's forum, you'll want to have the mods move this to the other one.
Would it not be for Pearl harbour with maybe a few extras tacked on, but PH is the main thing that the US public will care about?War crimes - specifically the execution of the survivors of USS Edsall.
Would he be tried for wars crimes? Or would he be a officer for the JMSDF by 1954 just like how Minuro Genda became third Chief of Staff of the JASDF? Or would he run for politics such as the Diet?
War crimes - specifically the execution of the survivors of USS Edsall.
Would it not be for Pearl harbour with maybe a few extras tacked on, but PH is the main thing that the US public will care about?
Nor so sure about Pearl Harbour. IMHO that would be the politicians seeking to wage aggressive war who should be arraigned. Keitel & Jodl were hanged because their signatures were on orders that promulgated the executions of POW's and enemy civilians. Halder was found not guilty despite being COS to OKW when Poland was attacked.Yeah, if he survives World War Two he's going to end up with a rope around his neck. Odds are he just commits suicide when Japan surrenders.
The main thing would be conspiracy to wage aggressive war and the attack on Pearl Harbor, which was a major war crime because the Japanese attacked without first issuing a declaration. Add to that any number of war crimes that occurred in areas under IJN responsibility. Even under a fair court like at Nuremberg as opposed to what MacArthur created, he would have been a dead man.
Did he commit war crimes as far as we know.Would he be tried for wars crimes? Or would he be a officer for the JMSDF by 1954 just like how Minuro Genda became third Chief of Staff of the JASDF? Or would he run for politics such as the Diet?
According @Coulsdon Eagle, the survivors of the USS Edsall were summarily executed while @Asp states that the Pearl Habor attacks was a war crime because war was not yet formally declared.Did he commit war crimes as far as we know.
Did he give the order or personally do it? This very thread is one of the results when I look.War crimes - specifically the execution of the survivors of USS Edsall.
If we look to Admiral Doenitz in Germany he was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment, so i could see the same thing happening to Yamamoto.According @Coulsdon Eagle, the survivors of the USS Edsall were summarily executed while @Asp states that the Pearl Habor attacks was a war crime because war was not yet formally declared.
Now this presents the question what if Nagumo also survived. Would he be hanged too?
Backtracking my own answer, I would agree that if Yamamoto could get a good lawyer, he'd have a chance - especially if his lawyer made the same argument that saved Doenitz's neck.If we look to Admiral Doenitz in Germany he was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment, so i could see the same thing happening to Yamamoto.
Also i think he would be tried as a Class ‘C’ war criminal (he was directed by his government to plan what turned out to be an illegal attack, but had not been an advocate for it or part of the group who made the final decision), and as he had not intentionally tried to attack the US without warning (The Declaration of War was supposed to have been submitted before the attack).Backtracking my own answer, I would agree that if Yamamoto could get a good lawyer, he'd have a chance - especially if his lawyer made the same argument that saved Doenitz's neck.
Is this the same way how Speer got life imprisonment? Then he was released and later died in the UK in 1981.Backtracking my own answer, I would agree that if Yamamoto can get a good lawyer, he'd have a chance - especially if his lawyer makes the same argument that saved Doenitz's neck.
Depends on his lawyer and the judge.Also i think he would be tried as a Class ‘C’ war criminal (he was directed by his government to plan what turned out to be an illegal attack, but had not been an advocate for it or part of the group who made the final decision), and as he had not intentionally tried to attack the US without warning (The Declaration of War was supposed to have been submitted before the attack).
But that is my view.
Assuming he gets a good lawyer and lenient judge, he would probably be jailed then released later. I could see him become an advisor or a consultant to the JMSDF.Depends on his lawyer and the judge.
Nor so sure about Pearl Harbour. IMHO that would be the politicians seeking to wage aggressive war who should be arraigned. Keitel & Jodl were hanged because their signatures were on orders that promulgated the executions of POW's and enemy civilians. Halder was found not guilty despite being COS to OKW when Poland was attacked.
It will be the actions of the Combined Fleet in carrying out executions of prisoners in the NEI campaign that would be levelled against Yamamoto.
Did he give the order or personally do it? This very thread is one of the results when I look.
IMHO, "the guy who planned Pearl Harbor" is probably for the rope - of course, whether he deserves it for that or not is another matter.
Was a Yamamoto a fanatic like the IJA? If I recall correctly Yamamoto was the reasonable one. Could he have received a more lenient sentence like Albert Speer?
According @Coulsdon Eagle, the survivors of the USS Edsall were summarily executed while @Asp states that the Pearl Habor attacks was a war crime because war was not yet formally declared.
Now this presents the question what if Nagumo also survived. Would he be hanged too?
If we look to Admiral Doenitz in Germany he was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment, so i could see the same thing happening to Yamamoto.
Not questioning your logic, but I meant the apparent massacre of the poster mentioned, not if Yamamoto was uniquely culpable for Pearl.Japan didn't, and Yamamoto was pretty much singlehandedly responsible for the opening overture of the Pacific conflict. That would make his legal position significantly worse.