FIAT for World War 2 can mean something else:While the FIAT conglomerate had its issues, Italy was farther ahead on verically integrated large mass production than the UK was.
Field Intelligence Allied - Technical.
FIAT for World War 2 can mean something else:While the FIAT conglomerate had its issues, Italy was farther ahead on verically integrated large mass production than the UK was.
Yeah, that's the other reason for leaning to the US, they would have Oil revenues after the War, while the UK lost their hold on the Middle East production, and wasn't a player on the Oil Markets till the North Sea platforms opened.So a mix between a US and UK industry in Postwar Europe specifically with Libyan oil trade then right?
The difference is Libya will have a lot of Italians living there and are very close to Italy Homeland.
Portugal is not a good example for Italy on a topic on Libya because those countries have different population and close to the home country.
Yes I do agree that Apartheid SA is not sustainab, it just a thought not a actual result.
The fascist will be a lot more popular because they won the war in WW2 as well as the monarchy also in bed with the fascist party to maintain popularity to the people in Italy.
Remember this is the Cold war where US was supported Military Junta in South America, Asia and África. Why do you think the US wouldn't at least support the fascist Italians in Libya?
Okay Why? Portugal the small country compared to Italy and I even list why Portugal is not a really good example to Fasicist Italy.
Spain is more good example to Fasicist Italy.
OTOH, the Portuguese people wanted change at that point.Remember that to the Portuguese, Antonio Salazar is the greatest thing that ever happened to the Portuguese
But his regime did not survive his death
The same is true of Mussolini
The difference is Libya will have a lot of Italians living there and are very close to Italy Homeland.
Portugal is not a good example for Italy on a topic on Libya because those countries have different population and close to the home country.
Yes I do agree that Apartheid SA is not sustainab, it just a thought not a actual result.
The fascist will be a lot more popular because they won the war in WW2 as well as the monarchy also in bed with the fascist party to maintain popularity to the people in Italy.
Remember this is the Cold war where US was supported Military Junta in South America, Asia and África. Why do you think the US wouldn't at least support the fascist Italians in Libya?
Okay Why? Portugal the small country compared to Italy and I even list why Portugal is not a really good example to Fasicist Italy.
Spain is more good example to Fasicist Italy.
How many times I tell you? Libya is closer to Italian mainland than Sao Tome and Cabo Verde ever will. Portugal abandons them because of they can't handle the colonies rebellion in their Empire while Italy had Libya on their backyard.Sao Tome and Cabo Verde had a large white Portuguese population
And Portugal abandoned them. Why won't Italy give up Libya?
The difference is Libya will have a lot of Italians living there and are very close to Italy Homeland.
Portugal is not a good example for Italy on a topic on Libya because those countries have different population and close to the home country.
Yes I do agree that Apartheid SA is not sustainab, it just a thought not a actual result.
The fascist will be a lot more popular because they won the war in WW2 as well as the monarchy also in bed with the fascist party to maintain popularity to the people in Italy.
Remember this is the Cold war where US was supported Military Junta in South America, Asia and África. Why do you think the US wouldn't at least support the fascist Italians in Libya?
Okay Why? Portugal the small country compared to Italy and I even list why Portugal is not a really good example to Fasicist Italy.
Spain is more good example to Fasicist Italy.
By 1970 independence movements in the Portuguese colonies had been largely suppressed and dividedHow many times I tell you? Libya is closer to Italian mainland than Sao Tome and Cabo Verde ever will. Portugal abandons them because of they can't handle the colonies rebellion in their Empire while Italy had Libya on their backyard.
It's very likely that Libya will be an Italian province similar to Naples and Sardinia with many settlers throughout the Coastline in the Colonies
You have to realize that will be a political suicide right? The fascist party will be popular by the masses because of winning WW2 and Settlements of Libya and Eritrea to be Italianizated.Vittorio Emmanuel III is not immortal
So, as soon as Umberto II comes, the fascists will be expelled
You just copy your old posts on my respond to your old post.Sao Tome and Cabo Verde had a large white Portuguese population
And Portugal abandoned them. Why won't Italy give up Libya?
Because Portugal had a revolution and likely Italy is not had any at allBy 1970 independence movements in the Portuguese colonies had been largely suppressed and divided
She did not become independent except because the Portuguese themselves granted independence
Cabo Verde is actually close to Portugal and has become independent
This "backwards country" survive longer with Portugal dictatorship by a year and is also a fascist state as they were consider fascist.Spain is a backward country compared to Italy in the same period
Portugal is the most real fascist regime, unlike Spain, which is essentially a reactionary regime in the Franco era and closer to Horthy than to Mussolini.
They will likely will not want to change until the 90s where the Boogeyman of the Soviet Union will collapse and have no need to have a Fascist State anymoreOTOH, the Portuguese people wanted change at that point.
Would the Italians want real change in 1960, or just more of the same?
They will likely will not want to change until the 90s where the Boogeyman of the Soviet Union will collapse and have no need to have a Fascist State anymore
Did Juan Carlos commit political suicide when he dismantled the Franco regime? noYou have to realize that will be a political suicide right? The fascist party will be popular by the masses because of winning WW2 and Settlements of Libya and Eritrea to be Italianizated.
As much as Umberto II want don't kick out the fascist, they are too popular and Central to Italian government to get kicked out by the king.
You just copy your old posts on my respond to your old post.
Because Portugal had a revolution and likely Italy is not had any at all
View attachment 785229
View attachment 785230 You see that Italy closer to Libya than Portugal with Cabo Verde.
Remember a lot more Italians go and settle in Libya more than Portuguese on Cabo Verde
This "backwards country" survive longer with Portugal dictatorship by a year and is also a fascist state as they were consider fascist.
Also Mussolini regime OTL lasted 22 years before the Allies kick the fascist out, so it is not surprising if they lasted longer than any even Portugal & Spain did
The problem with your example is that those dictatorship was unpopular and understandable to continue.Did Juan Carlos commit political suicide when he dismantled the Franco regime? no
Constantine II kept the dictatorship, did he stay? No
Fascists have no supports? They were very well liked in Italy before WWII destroy their credibility and in TTL where did joined and won with Allies, they're still very well liked and supported.The fascists had no support but the king who gave them power
So if Umberto II restores democracy (and he will)
Support for fascists will vanish in the wind at lightning speed
Churchill wasn't a dictator, he was a prime minister(Churchill did not rule Britain until his death, although he won the war)
What? There was 130,000 Italian living in Libya and sitll continuing before world war II meaning if it continues there will likely be the majority in the 1960s or '70s.But racially it has a large number of white Portuguese you do not prove anything in reality
The difference between Ireland and Libya is that Libya have a lower population than Ireland at the time.Britain could not keep all of Ireland and It is geographically close to them so this is not an argument
Why this Generation will want Mussolini gone? To the people who was born under Mussolini, they only see him as the "Modern Caesar" and the "Savior of Italy" in most young Italian youth around the 60s.Of course they will want the generation that lived in the pre-fascist era to die
And there will be a generation born under Mussolini who will want him gone
They will still be several figures who will take Mussolini place to continue the fascist state. People like Italo Babo, Ciano and Junio Borghese etc will likely will be the next la duce in the 1960sThe fascists will not survive after 1960. The party is centered on Mussolini himself, and if he dies, it vanishes
The Spanish economic miracle did not ease the resentment of Franco why something like that would keep the fascists in earnestThe problem with your example is that those dictatorship was unpopular and understandable to continue.
Italy by contrast have a good economy, stable enough and satisfy the regime to not had a revolution.
Fascists have no supports? They were very well liked in Italy before WWII destroy their credibility and in TTL where did joined and won with Allies, they're still very well liked and supported.
Umberto II can't snap his fingers and bring democracy back into Italy without any pushback by the Italian people.
The support of the fascist wouldn't stop, that just too unrealistic
Churchill wasn't a dictator, he was a prime minister
What? There was 130,000 Italian living in Libya and sitll continuing before world war II meaning if it continues there will likely be the majority in the 1960s or '70s.
The difference between Ireland and Libya is that Libya have a lower population than Ireland at the time.
The Libyan people have only a million at most while the Italians have 45 million people to settled.
Why honestly do you think the Libyan people have any chance to defending Italy? They have tons of weapons, no regard to break the Geneva convention and Better controlled to the colony than Portugal and France combined.
Why this Generation will want Mussolini gone? To the people who was born under Mussolini, they only see him as the "Modern Caesar" and the "Savior of Italy" in most young Italian youth around the 60s.
Why would you want to remove t
They will still be several figures who will take Mussolini place to continue the fascist state. People like Italo Babo, Ciano and Junio Borghese etc will likely will be the next la duce in the 1960s
Didn't the fascist destroy them with just a couple years after they were in power?Because Libya has been rebellious, at least for more than 20 years, and the Italians barely subjugated the interior
In major citiesDidn't the fascist destroy them with just a couple years after they were in power?
They destroyed any Libyan resistance in the end of the 30s and even depopulate Cyrenacia with it's Indigenous Libyan to give more room for Italian settlements
Even today, look at the population densityIn major cities
The rest of Libya no
Even today, look at the population density
View attachment 785307
The People are in the Major Cities.
It's emptier than Afghanistan
View attachment 785308
Like I said Italy has a direct control to Libya compared to Portugal and France combined, where is the confusion here?In major cities
The rest of Libya no
Just as the Portuguese and the French did, and this strategy failed
And Libya has neighbors that are ready to help them (Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria).
Fighters will be smuggled and support will be smuggledLike I said Italy has a direct control to Libya compared to Portugal and France combined, where is the confusion here?
They have a lower population than Algeria and Mozambique natives by a vast margin
1962 Algeria: 11.32 Million
1970 Mozambique: 8.168 Million
1974 Angola: 6.762 Million
And for our little Libya
1960 Libya: 1.448 Million
Tunisia will just say it support Libya but not really do anything with it cause you know Italy is literally on the doorstep and help Libyan economy
I. MENTION. AGAIN. AND. AGAIN.
Egypt and Algeria will help Libya but the problem is that Italy will vastly more control in the colony because of the easier access to send troops there.
Where is the confusion here again?
"Balbo died in Libya (many suspicions that Mussolini killed him by his friend's fire)
And Bogrezzi will be the Italian Antonio Tejero
Ciano and Junio are not serious candidate
So the fascists end with the death of Mussolini"
Okay for as insurgency like Northern Ireland Yes! but full Independence War like Algeria? noFighters will be smuggled and support will be smuggled
This strategy has always worked
Balbo does not agree with Mussolini about many things, and even his death in Libya it was suspected that Mussolini had orchestrated it.OP clarifies that this thread is before, during and after WW2 of allies Italy meaning the death of Babo might be butterfly away because of POD.
Remember 15 years is a long time, so Ciano and Junio have enough time to be to be Serious candidates to be "Le Duce"
Okay for as insurgency like Northern Ireland Yes! but full Independence War like Algeria? no