What does an Allied Italy look like before, during, and after World War 2?

marathag

Banned
So a mix between a US and UK industry in Postwar Europe specifically with Libyan oil trade then right?
Yeah, that's the other reason for leaning to the US, they would have Oil revenues after the War, while the UK lost their hold on the Middle East production, and wasn't a player on the Oil Markets till the North Sea platforms opened.
 

ahmedali

Banned
The difference is Libya will have a lot of Italians living there and are very close to Italy Homeland.

Portugal is not a good example for Italy on a topic on Libya because those countries have different population and close to the home country.

Yes I do agree that Apartheid SA is not sustainab, it just a thought not a actual result.

The fascist will be a lot more popular because they won the war in WW2 as well as the monarchy also in bed with the fascist party to maintain popularity to the people in Italy.

Remember this is the Cold war where US was supported Military Junta in South America, Asia and África. Why do you think the US wouldn't at least support the fascist Italians in Libya?

Okay Why? Portugal the small country compared to Italy and I even list why Portugal is not a really good example to Fasicist Italy.

Spain is more good example to Fasicist Italy.

Spain is a backward country compared to Italy in the same period

Portugal is the most real fascist regime, unlike Spain, which is essentially a reactionary regime in the Franco era and closer to Horthy than to Mussolini.
 

marathag

Banned
Remember that to the Portuguese, Antonio Salazar is the greatest thing that ever happened to the Portuguese

But his regime did not survive his death
The same is true of Mussolini
OTOH, the Portuguese people wanted change at that point.
Would the Italians want real change in 1960, or just more of the same?
 

ahmedali

Banned
:
The difference is Libya will have a lot of Italians living there and are very close to Italy Homeland.

Portugal is not a good example for Italy on a topic on Libya because those countries have different population and close to the home country.

Yes I do agree that Apartheid SA is not sustainab, it just a thought not a actual result.

The fascist will be a lot more popular because they won the war in WW2 as well as the monarchy also in bed with the fascist party to maintain popularity to the people in Italy.

Remember this is the Cold war where US was supported Military Junta in South America, Asia and África. Why do you think the US wouldn't at least support the fascist Italians in Libya?

Okay Why? Portugal the small country compared to Italy and I even list why Portugal is not a really good example to Fasicist Italy.

Spain is more good example to Fasicist Italy.

Sao Tome and Cabo Verde had a large white Portuguese population

And Portugal abandoned them. Why won't Italy give up Libya?
 
Sao Tome and Cabo Verde had a large white Portuguese population

And Portugal abandoned them. Why won't Italy give up Libya?
How many times I tell you? Libya is closer to Italian mainland than Sao Tome and Cabo Verde ever will. Portugal abandons them because of they can't handle the colonies rebellion in their Empire while Italy had Libya on their backyard.

It's very likely that Libya will be an Italian province similar to Naples and Sardinia with many settlers throughout the Coastline in the Colonies
 

ahmedali

Banned
:
The difference is Libya will have a lot of Italians living there and are very close to Italy Homeland.

Portugal is not a good example for Italy on a topic on Libya because those countries have different population and close to the home country.

Yes I do agree that Apartheid SA is not sustainab, it just a thought not a actual result.

The fascist will be a lot more popular because they won the war in WW2 as well as the monarchy also in bed with the fascist party to maintain popularity to the people in Italy.

Remember this is the Cold war where US was supported Military Junta in South America, Asia and África. Why do you think the US wouldn't at least support the fascist Italians in Libya?

Okay Why? Portugal the small country compared to Italy and I even list why Portugal is not a really good example to Fasicist Italy.

Spain is more good example to Fasicist Italy.

Sao Tome and Cabo Verde had a large white Portuguese population

And Portugal abandoned them. Why won't Italy give up Libya?
How many times I tell you? Libya is closer to Italian mainland than Sao Tome and Cabo Verde ever will. Portugal abandons them because of they can't handle the colonies rebellion in their Empire while Italy had Libya on their backyard.

It's very likely that Libya will be an Italian province similar to Naples and Sardinia with many settlers throughout the Coastline in the Colonies
By 1970 independence movements in the Portuguese colonies had been largely suppressed and divided

She did not become independent except because the Portuguese themselves granted independence

Cabo Verde is actually close to Portugal and has become independent
 
Vittorio Emmanuel III is not immortal

So, as soon as Umberto II comes, the fascists will be expelled
You have to realize that will be a political suicide right? The fascist party will be popular by the masses because of winning WW2 and Settlements of Libya and Eritrea to be Italianizated.

As much as Umberto II want don't kick out the fascist, they are too popular and Central to Italian government to get kicked out by the king.
Sao Tome and Cabo Verde had a large white Portuguese population

And Portugal abandoned them. Why won't Italy give up Libya?
You just copy your old posts on my respond to your old post.
By 1970 independence movements in the Portuguese colonies had been largely suppressed and divided

She did not become independent except because the Portuguese themselves granted independence
Because Portugal had a revolution and likely Italy is not had any at all
Cabo Verde is actually close to Portugal and has become independent
1667163698496.png

1667163726981.png
You see that Italy closer to Libya than Portugal with Cabo Verde.

Remember a lot more Italians go and settle in Libya more than Portuguese on Cabo Verde
Spain is a backward country compared to Italy in the same period

Portugal is the most real fascist regime, unlike Spain, which is essentially a reactionary regime in the Franco era and closer to Horthy than to Mussolini.
This "backwards country" survive longer with Portugal dictatorship by a year and is also a fascist state as they were consider fascist.

Also Mussolini regime OTL lasted 22 years before the Allies kick the fascist out, so it is not surprising if they lasted longer than any even Portugal & Spain did
 
OTOH, the Portuguese people wanted change at that point.
Would the Italians want real change in 1960, or just more of the same?
They will likely will not want to change until the 90s where the Boogeyman of the Soviet Union will collapse and have no need to have a Fascist State anymore
 

ahmedali

Banned
They will likely will not want to change until the 90s where the Boogeyman of the Soviet Union will collapse and have no need to have a Fascist State anymore
You have to realize that will be a political suicide right? The fascist party will be popular by the masses because of winning WW2 and Settlements of Libya and Eritrea to be Italianizated.

As much as Umberto II want don't kick out the fascist, they are too popular and Central to Italian government to get kicked out by the king.

You just copy your old posts on my respond to your old post.

Because Portugal had a revolution and likely Italy is not had any at all

View attachment 785229
View attachment 785230 You see that Italy closer to Libya than Portugal with Cabo Verde.

Remember a lot more Italians go and settle in Libya more than Portuguese on Cabo Verde

This "backwards country" survive longer with Portugal dictatorship by a year and is also a fascist state as they were consider fascist.

Also Mussolini regime OTL lasted 22 years before the Allies kick the fascist out, so it is not surprising if they lasted longer than any even Portugal & Spain did
Did Juan Carlos commit political suicide when he dismantled the Franco regime? no

Constantine II kept the dictatorship, did he stay? No

The fascists had no support but the king who gave them power

So if Umberto II restores democracy (and he will)

Support for fascists will vanish in the wind at lightning speed

(Churchill did not rule Britain until his death, although he won the war)

But racially it has a large number of white Portuguese you do not prove anything in reality

Britain could not keep all of Ireland and It is geographically close to them so this is not an argument

Of course they will want the generation that lived in the pre-fascist era to die

And there will be a generation born under Mussolini who will want him gone

The fascists will not survive after 1960. The party is centered on Mussolini himself, and if he dies, it vanishes
 
Did Juan Carlos commit political suicide when he dismantled the Franco regime? no

Constantine II kept the dictatorship, did he stay? No
The problem with your example is that those dictatorship was unpopular and understandable to continue.

Italy by contrast have a good economy, stable enough and satisfy the regime to not had a revolution.
The fascists had no support but the king who gave them power

So if Umberto II restores democracy (and he will)

Support for fascists will vanish in the wind at lightning speed
Fascists have no supports? They were very well liked in Italy before WWII destroy their credibility and in TTL where did joined and won with Allies, they're still very well liked and supported.

Umberto II can't snap his fingers and bring democracy back into Italy without any pushback by the Italian people.

The support of the fascist wouldn't stop, that just too unrealistic
(Churchill did not rule Britain until his death, although he won the war)
Churchill wasn't a dictator, he was a prime minister
But racially it has a large number of white Portuguese you do not prove anything in reality
What? There was 130,000 Italian living in Libya and sitll continuing before world war II meaning if it continues there will likely be the majority in the 1960s or '70s.
Britain could not keep all of Ireland and It is geographically close to them so this is not an argument
The difference between Ireland and Libya is that Libya have a lower population than Ireland at the time.

The Libyan people have only a million at most while the Italians have 45 million people to settled.

Why honestly do you think the Libyan people have any chance to defending Italy? They have tons of weapons, no regard to break the Geneva convention and Better controlled to the colony than Portugal and France combined.
Of course they will want the generation that lived in the pre-fascist era to die

And there will be a generation born under Mussolini who will want him gone
Why this Generation will want Mussolini gone? To the people who was born under Mussolini, they only see him as the "Modern Caesar" and the "Savior of Italy" in most young Italian youth around the 60s.

Why would you want to remove t
The fascists will not survive after 1960. The party is centered on Mussolini himself, and if he dies, it vanishes
They will still be several figures who will take Mussolini place to continue the fascist state. People like Italo Babo, Ciano and Junio Borghese etc will likely will be the next la duce in the 1960s
 

ahmedali

Banned
The problem with your example is that those dictatorship was unpopular and understandable to continue.

Italy by contrast have a good economy, stable enough and satisfy the regime to not had a revolution.

Fascists have no supports? They were very well liked in Italy before WWII destroy their credibility and in TTL where did joined and won with Allies, they're still very well liked and supported.

Umberto II can't snap his fingers and bring democracy back into Italy without any pushback by the Italian people.

The support of the fascist wouldn't stop, that just too unrealistic

Churchill wasn't a dictator, he was a prime minister

What? There was 130,000 Italian living in Libya and sitll continuing before world war II meaning if it continues there will likely be the majority in the 1960s or '70s.

The difference between Ireland and Libya is that Libya have a lower population than Ireland at the time.

The Libyan people have only a million at most while the Italians have 45 million people to settled.

Why honestly do you think the Libyan people have any chance to defending Italy? They have tons of weapons, no regard to break the Geneva convention and Better controlled to the colony than Portugal and France combined.

Why this Generation will want Mussolini gone? To the people who was born under Mussolini, they only see him as the "Modern Caesar" and the "Savior of Italy" in most young Italian youth around the 60s.

Why would you want to remove t

They will still be several figures who will take Mussolini place to continue the fascist state. People like Italo Babo, Ciano and Junio Borghese etc will likely will be the next la duce in the 1960s
The Spanish economic miracle did not ease the resentment of Franco why something like that would keep the fascists in earnest

Nonsense, the march of Rome was ridiculous, but it was the excessive fear of the king and the nobility that made them seize power.


Anything could have led to a massacre (literally all the leaders of the fascist party were at the rally) and therefore no fascism

Because Libya has been rebellious, at least for more than 20 years, and the Italians barely subjugated the interior

And the number of eggs in Cape Verde is twice that in reality

Ireland was less populated in 1900 than the United Kingdom

Balbo died in Libya (many suspicions that Mussolini killed him by his friend's fire)

And Bogrezzi will be the Italian Antonio Tejero

Ciano and Junio are not serious candidates

So the fascists end with the death of Mussolini

And Mussolini is prime minister thanks to the goodwill of the king and not thanks to any popular support so overthrowing the fascists is very easy

And why are the Italians angry about Umberto II's democratic return to the country?


Unless you think they are like Russians :)

Finally, the army divided it towards the king, not to the Duchi

The army chief and the prime minister said they could put down the march easily
 
Because Libya has been rebellious, at least for more than 20 years, and the Italians barely subjugated the interior
Didn't the fascist destroy them with just a couple years after they were in power?

They destroyed any Libyan resistance in the end of the 30s and even depopulate Cyrenacia with it's Indigenous Libyan to give more room for Italian settlements
 

ahmedali

Banned
Didn't the fascist destroy them with just a couple years after they were in power?

They destroyed any Libyan resistance in the end of the 30s and even depopulate Cyrenacia with it's Indigenous Libyan to give more room for Italian settlements
In major cities

The rest of Libya no

Just as the Portuguese and the French did, and this strategy failed

And Libya has neighbors that are ready to help them (Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria).
 
In major cities

The rest of Libya no

Just as the Portuguese and the French did, and this strategy failed

And Libya has neighbors that are ready to help them (Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria).
Like I said Italy has a direct control to Libya compared to Portugal and France combined, where is the confusion here?

They have a lower population than Algeria and Mozambique natives by a vast margin

1962 Algeria: 11.32 Million
1970 Mozambique: 8.168 Million
1974 Angola: 6.762 Million
And for our little Libya

1960 Libya: 1.448 Million


Tunisia will just say it support Libya but not really do anything with it cause you know Italy is literally on the doorstep and help Libyan economy

I. MENTION. AGAIN. AND. AGAIN.
Egypt and Algeria will help Libya but the problem is that Italy will vastly more control in the colony because of the easier access to send troops there.

Where is the confusion here again?
 

ahmedali

Banned
Like I said Italy has a direct control to Libya compared to Portugal and France combined, where is the confusion here?

They have a lower population than Algeria and Mozambique natives by a vast margin

1962 Algeria: 11.32 Million
1970 Mozambique: 8.168 Million
1974 Angola: 6.762 Million
And for our little Libya

1960 Libya: 1.448 Million


Tunisia will just say it support Libya but not really do anything with it cause you know Italy is literally on the doorstep and help Libyan economy

I. MENTION. AGAIN. AND. AGAIN.
Egypt and Algeria will help Libya but the problem is that Italy will vastly more control in the colony because of the easier access to send troops there.

Where is the confusion here again?
Fighters will be smuggled and support will be smuggled

This strategy has always worked
 
"Balbo died in Libya (many suspicions that Mussolini killed him by his friend's fire)
And Bogrezzi will be the Italian Antonio Tejero
Ciano and Junio are not serious candidate
So the fascists end with the death of Mussolini"

OP clarifies that this thread is before, during and after WW2 of allies Italy meaning the death of Babo might be butterfly away because of POD.

Remember 15 years is a long time, so Ciano and Junio have enough time to be to be Serious candidates to be "Le Duce"
Fighters will be smuggled and support will be smuggled

This strategy has always worked
Okay for as insurgency like Northern Ireland Yes! but full Independence War like Algeria? no
 
Last edited:

ahmedali

Banned
OP clarifies that this thread is before, during and after WW2 of allies Italy meaning the death of Babo might be butterfly away because of POD.

Remember 15 years is a long time, so Ciano and Junio have enough time to be to be Serious candidates to be "Le Duce"

Okay for as insurgency like Northern Ireland Yes! but full Independence War like Algeria? no
Balbo does not agree with Mussolini about many things, and even his death in Libya it was suspected that Mussolini had orchestrated it.

Yes, it will reach the levels of Algeria thanks to Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, the Soviets, most of the Arab countries and the United States

(The United States would want an independent Libya that would give them fuel instead of Italy, which controls them)

Count Ciano had betrayed Mussolini, so he's going to rule him out because he might intend to turn against him

I don't understand why you insist that the fascists will remain in power if they win the war

When neither Roosevelt nor Churchill succeeded in this

Of all the dictators, they are the weakest in terms of the stability of their legs

(The King is the one who saw them when no one took them seriously and could drive them out with a little fear)


Stalin is an exception because he had a very scary reputation in the Soviet Union

So much so that Mussolini, appointed by the king himself, could not even dream of it

With the death of Vittorio Emmanuel III, Umberto II will expel him without any fear on his throne

Because the army is loyal to him and not to the Duce, and the Italians will be satisfied to restore democracy to a large extent

Mussolini's reputation will probably be that of Salazar
 
Top