Is there a way to show the need for alternative narratives throughout time period in your mind without it being "dramatic".
Sound like you just don't want them, you're focusing on "extreme afrocentrism" but don't seem to understand literal extreme eurocentrism being the thing you're defending as a norm. Nor do you seem to understand the inherent revision that entails.
You're proving my point.
I wasn’t opposing your point; I agree that we need more minority narratives in historical study.
I was trying to consider the mindset of people opposed to these changes to historiography—they’ll take strawmen and use them as justification.