You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
alternatehistory.com
Conventional thinking during a large part of the cold war was that NATO would not be able to stop the Red Army by conventional means. If the Russian Bear rolled westward it was felt that at some point NATO would have to resort to tactical nuclear weapons. This then could escalate into a full scale nuclear exchange.
Was this conventional view correct ? - or could NATO have stopped them conventionally?