Yeah I get what you mean now, but I felt these options were sufficiently different that I had to capture each one separately. And it depends on how you mentally group the options. You put #1 on its own, and #2 and #3 go together as "against the present rule". I always thought of #1 and #2 together (having some size limit) and #3 on its own (no size limit) since a lot of the discussion (in the past few months, not just recently) seemed to frame the question as whether we should have a size limit at all. So in my mind I have split the "have a size limit" votes but I can still see where you are coming from.
Weekly Flag Challenge referendum: Abolish image size limit?
- Thread starter Transparent Blue
- Start date
Yeah I get what you mean now, but I felt these options were sufficiently different that I had to capture each one separately. And it depends on how you mentally group the options. You put #1 on its own, and #2 and #3 go together as "against the present rule". I always thought of #1 and #2 together (having some size limit) and #3 on its own (no size limit) since a lot of the discussion (in the past few months, not just recently) seemed to frame the question as whether we should have a size limit at all. So in my mind I have split the "have a size limit" votes but I can still see where you are coming from.
In the event that the second option wins, as seems likely at present time, I assume we're keeping the simple "fit within an x*y rectangle" rather than the more radical "fit length+height<=z, length<=x" or "fit length*height<=z, length<=x" options for those wanting aspect ratios closer to 1:1 without losing too much length?
The winner is option #2, "No, keep a size limit but increase it to a larger size". I suggest to continue any further discussion on the main discussion thread so that more people will see it.