That got a chuckle out of me. Thank you.
You're welcome. But, unfortunately, I cannot take the credit. It actually goes back to the the campaign itself.
That got a chuckle out of me. Thank you.
We need a POD around the time of the first christian church. Otherwise we need a ASB to have the entire world embrace the Swedish LBTQ stance
It's what we do.In other words, just change the entire history of the world from 1929 forward?
This MIGHT have an effect in countries where the Moscow-line Communist Parties were a significant political force, eg. France, Italy, and Greece. It would have zero impact almost anywhere in the euro-anglosphere(ie. the US, UK Cananda, Australia etc) where no one cared what the Communists thought.
Okay firstly is there any evidence that the other serious contenders were any less hetero bigots and family lovers, sex lives 1917-1923 not withstanding? Or that for want of a better descriptor "state capitalism" wouldn't create and mobilise the proletarian family like 19th century capital to put the cost of improved labour power on women?
Because the Spd kpd and germanliberals weren't homophobes? Shit, I don't even know if the kapd/aaud took a proletarian position on sexuality.
In 19th century Australia there were many men with mates and passing women. The first premier of Queensland had a good mate. So forms of passing and non policing are possible and possible to expand. The obvious POD is that the Catholic family wage concept doesn't influence the harvester judgement leading to a legally diluted concept of family in trade unionism and the fights for male and female wage. The long term affects being a reduction of the capitalist family and support for the sole bread winner concept of the proletarian individual. And cashed up individuals tend to demand the right to buy or root whomever they wish.
The Holy Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, all Protestant denominations, Judaism and (I believe) Islam all are against homosexuality and sex roles beyond the traditional, and won't even think about "gender identifying" at any of these PODs mentioned. Stalin wanted conformity, not diversity. Hitler wanted lots of blonde-haired, blue-eyed babies to run the world.
Your POD would have to be waaaaaaaaaay back in time to change what's been happening lately, because it's taken the weakening of the religious influences and science to get here.
We need a POD around the time of the first christian church. Otherwise we need a ASB to have the entire world embrace the Swedish LBTQ stance
If not HIV/AIDS what about the wonderful gamut of other STIs to stigmatise a newly militant population that threatens the patriarchal family? AIDS was the excuse, the stigmata were inflicted for the crime of love being love not domestic bondage.
English legal reformer Jeremy Bentham either finds a co-author which he tried a little to do, or he finds a way to advance his ideas in a series of medium steps through a series of essays ? ?Have revolutionary or Napoleonic France impose its Penal Code which legalized homosexuality (because of anti-clericalism, not because the French were specially fond of LGBT rights) on even more countries. . .
English legal reformer Jeremy Bentham either finds a co-author which he tried a little to do
That would define rape and maybe inadvertently legalize homosexualality.
No because homosexuality wasn't illegal because of the lack of consent. It was illegal under sodomy laws, which often also criminalized heterosexual anal intercourse. It wasn't a question of consent but of the practice itself.
We need a POD around the time of the first christian church. Otherwise we need a ASB to have the entire world embrace the Swedish LBTQ stance
Hence why being a lesbian technically wasn't illegal but being a gay man was...
Lesbians nonetheless faced legal challenges, for example in the armed forces.