Washington Burns: A Story of Alternate America

As I said, he does great when it comes to interpersonal relations but his alternate history scenarios fall flat. It seems like he can't help but put in blatant parallels to OTL history in his books.

Gordon McSweeney. It seems like it was originally intended for America to lose the Great War and set up an equivalent to the Weimar Republic as a prologue to McSweeney's Notzis. So no matter what it would've paralleled OTL history. It's just that Fascist America is much more interesting than making the Confederates the bad guys in order to play out the Civil War 80 years later. Hence why there was a timeline exploring that possibility on this site.

Don't rush it. It'll be ready when it's ready.

Ah yeah! He was the guy that was really pious too, right? Died towards the end of the war? Or am I getting things confused with someone else?

Not rushing, just trying to stay disciplined and regular in writing. :)

In opinion some parallels are avoidable, some aren't. ACW, avoidable. WWI & WWII, not so much. In the TL-191 series I mean.

The TL-191 series avoided the actual course of the Civil War only to recreate it with tanks and bombers decades later. And the powers of Europe were going to fight a big war sooner or later.

Parallels yes, but they don't have to mirror things so closely. Sometimes, it's nice to have that happen, but too much and it weighs things down and detracts from the overall work.
 
Chapter 12: The Littlefield Presidency, 1877-1883
---The Littlefield Presidency (1877-1883)---

FEDERALISM REIGNS SUPREME


FRANKLIN - Just days after Federalist Horace Littlefield was sworn in as the 17th President of the United States, the House of Representatives, now controlled overwhelmingly by the Federalists following the reduction in size that was approved of in the Gilford-Hammon Act, has elected Michael Follett, representative from Massachusetts, as the next First Secretary and Speaker, replacing outgoing First Secretary Benjamin Conroy of Ohio. This is the first time ever that both the President and the First Secretary have been Federalist, and only the third time since the position of First Secretary was established in 1819 that the position has been held by a Federalist at all. Most political commentators attribute this major swing from the Democrats as continued reaction by voters to the Clark Scandal that forced President Quincy to resign two years ago. Now, for the first time, Americans will get a real taste of full Federalist control of government.
“Federalism Reigns Supreme,” Brooklyn Standard, March 10, 1877.

---
PRESIDENT ANNOUNCES NATIONAL TOUR

FRANKLIN - President Littlefield, only one month into office, has announced plans to go on a national tour during the summer, to celebrate the start of his term as President. The presidential ontourage will use the train that the Littlefield’s used during the campaign, that is now being upgraded for its occupant’s new status. The so-called “Eagle Express,” will leave from Franklin on May 1st, and the President intends on visiting Philadelphia, Brooklyn, Boston, Charleston, New Orleans, and St. Louis on this tour, and is expected to be back in Franklin by September.

This will mark the first time that a sitting President has spent considerable time away from the capital while in office. There has been some concern about the legality of the President being away from Congress and his ability to sign bills into law, or veto them. However, the Attorney General believes that, with the widespread use of the telegraph, new bills can be sent to the President and signed or vetoed on the road.
“President Announces National Tour,” Brooklyn Standard, April 1, 1877.

---
REVOLT IN VIENNA

VIENNA, AUSTRIA - Imperial authorities are reporting that masses of malcontents have taken to the streets throughout Vienna to protest what they term as “continued poor leadership since the War with Prussia.” Emperor Maximilian is reportedly holed up in the Imperial Palace, now surrounded by rioters. Despite official attempts to downplay the severity of the uprisings, some believe this is the first spark of a full scale revolution, the likes of which Europe has not seen since 1789. Austria has suffered heavily since the defeat at the hands of Prussia last year. High war indemnities have crippled the economy, along with the loss of territory and a severing of the alliance with Bavaria (Bavaria’s King Maximilian II abdicated in favor of his grandson, the twelve year old Prince Otto Maximilian, now King Maximilian III, and the country is now ruled by a pro-Prussian regent).

Austria’s Emperor landed on the throne unexpectedly, after the death of his Uncle, Ferdinand I, and father, Franz Karl, in 1874 and 1876. He has been dubbed the “unexpected Emperor,” and seems incapable of ruling effectually. There have been a string of senior ministers appointed and then resigning or being dismissed, while little has been done to stabilize the country since the war ended nearly a year ago. The Austrian Empire is made up of several different nationalities, and some wonder if Maximilian does not get a firm grip on power soon, the whole empire might splinter apart. And this revolt in Vienna may just be the first crack that brings the land of the Hapsburgs crumbling down.
“Revolt in Vienna,” Boston Eagle, April 17, 1877.

---
GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE OPENS!

FRANKLIN - Despite several delays, accidents, and going several thousands of dollars over budget, the George Washington Bridge, connecting the North and South Banks of the City of Franklin, has officially opened for traffic. The span, the nation’s first large suspension bridge, connects the two sides of the nation’s capital, spanning the Ohio River and linking the two halves of the city’s central thoroughfare, Union Avenue. The bridge was supposed to be completed in time for the nation’s centennial celebrations last year, but several setbacks prevented this.

Either end of the bridge is anchored by two tall towers, currently only dwarfed in the city by the spire of the Congress Hall. Each tower acts like an arched gateway, and the left side of each gate has a large statue of Washington. The first, on the South Bank, depicts General Washington, in uniform, leading his men on horseback. The second, on the North Bank, depicts President Washington, poised as though to address the masses. An eagle adorns the top of either gate, wings outstretched, as if guarding either entrance to the bridge.

President Littlefield was in attendance at the opening ceremony, on the South Bank of the river, where he was given the honor of cutting the ribbon officially opening the bridge. He and his wife, Caroline, were the first to cross, followed by the carriage of the First Secretary.
“George Washington Bridge Opens!” Franklin Observer, April 20, 1877.

---
AUSTRIAN REPUBLIC DECLARED

VIENNA - The riots that broke out in early April have now turned into full-fledged revolution, with rebels seizing control of the Austrian capital and declaring the establishment of the Austrian Republic. Emperor Maximilian has been captured by the revolutionaries and reportedly imprisoned in the Hofburg Palace. There is fighting reported in multiple areas of the country, and reports of secondary revolts breaking out in Hungary and elsewhere, establishing nationalist republics and breaking up the Austrian Empire. It remains to be seen if the Austrian Armed Forces can turn back the tide, or if any of the other powers in Europe will react, and how.

“Austrian Republic Declared,” Franklin Observer, May 27, 1877.

---
PRESIDENT DECLARES SUPPORT FOR MANHATTAN

MANHATTAN - After a day visiting the city of Brooklyn as part of his national “whistlestop” tour, President Littlefield took a ferry over to Manhattan Island, where he toured the city with Administrator Alexander Hamilton III. After reviewing the plans for the city at Clinton Castle, still the headquarters of the Manhattan Commission, Hamilton and other officials took the President and First Lady on a tour of the city. The central avenue, Portman Boulevard, is still largely unpaved, and many of the lots along it remain vacant and unpurchased. After stopping at Union Plaza and seeing the still incomplete city hall, the President then insisted on seeing the different neighborhoods of the city, many of which are in appalling condition.

When the entourage arrived back at Clinton Castle, the President made an impromptu address, where he stated, “for too long, this island has languished in need of real financial support, something that has been promised almost since the War ended 15 years ago, and it is a disgrace to this nation that one of our grandest cities has been left to wallow in the mud of ruin brought upon it by the old Slavers. It is my solemn promise that the Federal Government will come to the aid of the rebuilding of this city before my tenure as President is at it’s end. Manhattan will rise from the ashes.”

Some speculate that the President will work with the state government in Albany to have Manhattan Island declared a Federal District, something many support. The Friends of New York Society, headquartered in Westchester, recently endorsed this plan, believing that investment from the Federal Government might be able to finish the rebuilding of the city that Mr. Hamilton has long labored for.
“President Declares Support for Manhattan,” Brooklyn Standard, May 20, 1877.

---
Hail Columbia! had served as the nation’s unofficial anthem since the late 18th century, having been composed for Washington’s inauguration in 1789. Despite its wide use and relative popularity, it was not the only song used for official events nationwide. Land of Liberty, written in 1818, was used widely in the midwest, and in New England Yankee Doodle had remained popular. During the War Between the States, Freedom’s Hymn, written in 1849 by Abolitionist Mercy Baxter, became the de facto anthem of the Confederation, and remained incredibly popular after the North defeated the Slavers in 1862. The popularity of this song spread into the old Midwest, and into Freedmen-held territory, and by the 1870s was the second most popular “national anthem” in the United States. This sparked a lot of contention with those that found the song too divisive, especially by Westerners. In 1877, action was finally taken.

Proposed by Indiana Representative Josiah Young, the “National Anthem Act” was submitted to the House of Representatives in May of 1877, and declared that the national anthem of the United States would be Hail Columbia!, which would be used for all official ceremonies that called for the use of such an anthem. The law stated that while other patriotic songs could be played at official functions, if only one song were to be played it had to be Hail Columbia! Representative Young stated that, while he knew many liked Freedom’s Hymn, many Democrats saw it as a song of rebellion, and that it did nothing but rub salt in the wounds of those who lost the War, which would not help heal the wounds of the past. “Hail Columbia!, a song we have sung since the 1780s, will help our nation find common ground, whereas Freedom’s Hymn comes across as a victor’s triumphant boast.”

The bill was hotly debated in the House, but ultimately passed on June 30, 1877, and was presented to the Senate, which took it’s time debating the matter, not passing it until August 1st. Despite being a fan of Freedom’s Hymn, President Littlefield felt that the logic behind Young’s bill made sense, and so he signed the law three days later, doing so in New Orleans while on his famous train tour of the country. In a ceremony in Brandt Square, the citizens of Louisiana’s most prosperous city looked on while the President signed the bill into law, and a band played the new official national anthem. Visitors to Brandt Square can find a small plaque marking the site where the signing took place, not far from the tall bronze statue of Hugo Brandt that dominates the plaza in central New Orleans in front of St. Louis Cathedral.
Guthrie, Virginia. America’s National Symbols. Brooklyn, NY: Harper Brother’s, 1976.

---
PRESIDENTIAL SURPRISE: ON TO OREGON!

ST. LOUIS - President Littlefield surprised the nation when he announced at the end of his visit to St. Louis, that instead of returning to Franklin, he would instead be visiting Oregon, following the railway along the Fifth National Road. He announced planned stops in Fort Calhoun, Platte Territory, and New Boston and Astoria, Oregon, but it is expected he will also stop in smaller communities along the Fifth National Road as he crosses into Metropotamia, Washington, and Cascadia Territories.

When asked if he was worried about old Slavers in the West who didn’t much care for Federalists from New York, the President replied, “Not at all. As much as they probably dislike me and who they think I represent, there is no way any of them would take a shot at me. Not when it would make Augustus Bailey the first Negro President of the United States. He’s the best protection the Presidential Guard could ask for when dealing with the old Slavers!” He chuckled at this, as did the crowd around him.

This trek to Oregon means that the President will likely not return to Franklin until November, at the earliest. Some are grumbling that President Littlefield is shirking his duties, but his aides have pointed out that he has been able to keep up with all communications coming from the capital via telegraph without problem.
“Presidential Surprise: On to Oregon!” Franklin Observer, August 20, 1877.

---
President Littlefield is often nicknamed as the “Traveler President,” not only for his “inaugural whistlestop tour,” where the President visited all the major cities along the federal railroad lines that followed the National Roads, including a first ever Presidential visit to Oregon, but also his eventual success at visiting every single state in the Union (including Dixiana, which terrified the senior leadership of the Presidential Guard), and his trip to Victoria, Borealia, to visit with the Borealian Prime Minister in June of 1880, becoming the first American President to travel abroad while in office.

There were many critics of the President’s constant travelling. Democrats consistently complained, saying he was shirking his duties as president. But Littlefield revolutionized the Presidency, using the modern technology of telegraphy to remain in regular contact with officials in Franklin, and signed many pieces of legislation while traveling, proving that the President of the United States need not be chained to his desk in the Presidential Study in Washington House. This would pave the way for future presidents to go even further abroad, including President Rowling’s historic trip to London in 1893.
Rowling, Dr. Boris. Littlefield: Governing on the Move. Franklin, DW: UUS Press House, 2009.


---
PRESIDENT PROPOSES FEDERAL POLICE

FRANKLIN - President Littlefield, along with other Federalists, has proposed the establishment of a new Federal organization to help police certain crimes that affect the nation as a whole. The so-called “Federal Security Service” would primarily be charged with protecting all banks, including the National Bank, which is currently protected by the Presidential Guard. The security service, as proposed, would also look into issues like counterfeiting, and certain other interstate crimes that are not the jurisdiction of any one state. This new organization would also be encompassing the Federal Marshal Service, and helping to maintain law and order in the territories.

Democrats feel this is too broad an expansion of Federal power, but it has broad support from Federalists, who still have a comfortable majority in both houses of Congress, so the measure will likely pass when presented.
“President Proposes Federal Police,” Boston Eagle, February 3, 1878.

---
FEMALE SUFFRAGE VOTE FALLS SHORT IN MASSACHUSETTS

BOSTON - The National Woman Suffrage Association fell short of it’s goal of achieving suffrage for women in the first state to hold such a vote on the subject. Members of the Massachusetts votes almost two-to-one against the measure, showing a split in the ideology of the Federalist Party, which controls a majority of seats. NWSA leader Elizabeth Cady-Brewer stated after the vote, “Today we fell short, but we have not lost the long struggle. This was but the opening salvo of our fight for equality for women.” Ever since the War, there has been a growing number of former Abolitionists who are taking up the cause of Women’s Suffrage. Mrs. Cady-Brewer told reporters that she feels confident that women will have the vote across the country before the dawn of the twentieth century.
“Female Suffrage Vote Falls Short in Massachusetts,” Franklin Observer, June 9, 1878.

---
The American Liberal Party got its start in the Women’s Suffrage Movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. After the War Between the States, Federalists, the so-called “Party of Abolition,” had become the defacto party of liberalism and social progress. But the mantel fit awkwardly for many members, who felt that some liberal ideas were too extreme for what the Founding Fathers of federalism intended, and so balked at the ideas, such as the female vote, end of property requirement for the franchise, and workplace protection for the growing class of industrial workers in northeastern cities, which had typically been the bastion of the Federalist Party. The ALP was officially founded in 1880, two years after the failure of the Equal Voting Rights Bill failed in the Massachusetts legislature, killed by many prominent Federalists of the time. The loss of members to the ALP from the Federalists would be slow at first, but by the 1890s became significant enough to cause the a split vote from the traditional Federalist base and allow the Democrats to take back both parts of government.
Sanders, Dr. Virginia. American Liberalism. Manhattan, FD, Manhattan Univ Press, 1990.


---
FIRST OWENITE ELECTED TO CONGRESS

INDIANAPOLIS - Election officials are reporting that Ernest Owens, grandson of the famous industrialist and social reformer, has been elected to Congress. Robert Owen established the communalist society at New Harmony, Indiana, in 1827, and has family has played prominently in Indiana politics for years. In New Harmony, the Owen family have been slowly crafting their philosophy of “communalism,” where a society shares their wealth equally for all members for the community. In New Harmony, the citizens live in community apartments, working together on farms and in factories and farms that are owned by the whole group, and the profits of which are also shared. The Owenites, or the Social Progressive Party, as they are officially known, have been a part of politics in southwest Indiana for years, but this is the first time that a member of the party has served in Congress.
“First Owenite Elected to Congress,” Franklin Observer, November 7, 1878.

---
FEDERALIST RETAIN CONTROL BY ONE SEAT!

FRANKLIN - The Federalists have maintained their control of the House of Representatives by one seat, to the chagrin of the Democrats, who vowed to unseat First Secretary Michael Follett, who will now keep his position at least until 1881. The Federalists now have 132 seats (with Owenite Ernest Owens of Indiana caucusing with the Feds) to the Democrats 119, with the Republican having 12 seats. This is a small but noticeable increase for the Republicans, who had only 6 seats after the 1876 election.

President Littlefield told reporters at Washington House that he was “relieved to not have a change in the position of First Secretary for the next two years. It makes things easier to govern when both the Executive and Legislative Branches of government are in sync, something that might not have been maintained had the Democrats retaking the House.”

Despite being unable to retake the House, the Senate is now likely to be in Democratic hands. Both Federalists and Democrats have 30 seats, with 4 now belonging to the Republicans thanks to the readmission of South Carolina. This puts the Federalist 30 votes (31 if you count the Vice President in a tie vote), to the Democratic/Republican bloc of 34 votes. It remains to be seen how much of an impact this will have.
“Federalists Retain Control By One Seat!” Manhattan Gazette, November 8, 1878.

---
PROPOSED DISTRICT OF MANHATTAN ENDORSED BY PRESIDENT!

FRANKLIN - President Littlefield, in a letter to Congress, endorsed a bill presented by New York Senator James Newman calling for the Federal Government to take direct control of the island of Manhattan, and to help finance the rest of the rebuilding of the city. This has been met by mixed response in Manhattan and in the rest of New York, but many in Albany have expressed relief, including Governor Phillip Underwood, who stated, “the State of New York would be better served giving up the tattered island of Manhattan, that remains to this day, 17 years after the guns fell silent and the War Between the States ended, a ghost of it’s former self, infested with immigrants and others of a less than savory nature, than trying to funnel hard earned taxpayer dollars into that mess.” Mayor Porter echoed this sentiments, saying “hopefully, under direct Federal control and receiving Federal dollars, the island of Manhattan can recover and be our twin city, instead of the quagmire that it has been since the War.” It is unclear yet whether Congress will approve the plan, even with the President’s party enjoying control of the House. The Senate is in unofficial Democratic hands, and there are Federalists in both Houses who are unsure that the Federal Government should take over the island city.
“Proposed District of Manhattan Endorsed By President!” Brooklyn Standard, February 12, 1879.

---
AUSTRIAN CIVIL WAR ENDS

VIENNA - After two years of bloody fighting, the Austrian Civil War has ended, with a cease fire having been signed between the defeated Royalist forces and victorious Republican and Nationalist Forces outside Budapest. A treaty is expected to be signed in a matter of weeks, which will formally dissolve the Austrian Empire, replacing it with the Republics of Austria, Hungaria, Czechia, Slovakia, Romania, Serbia, Croatia, and Slovenia. The Habsburg family, minus the now late Emperor Maximilian who died in the custody of the Austrian Republic, are reportedly being granted asylum in Rome by the Pope, despite protests from the leaders of the Italian Union.

Some now wonder what will happen next, in particular if the Kingdom of Prussia will allow the Austrian Republic to exist on its periphery, or will it march in and attempt to reestablish some form of monarchy in Vienna. While King Frederick William V has been considered a political moderate, especially when compared to his father, who helped Austria crush the liberal German Republic in 1841, he is far from supportive of true democracy, and is far more conservative than France’s King Henry V or Britain’s Queen Victoria.
“Austrian Civil War Ends,” Franklin Observer, April 14, 1879.

---
FRACTURE IN FEDERALIST PARTY

PROVIDENCE, RI - Liberal members of the Federalist Party met in Providence today for the start of a meeting entitled the “Conference of Liberal Federalists.” Increasingly since the War, left-leaning social reformers in the Federalist Party, which flocked to the Hamiltonian institution in the fight against slavery, are finding themselves more at odds with the conservative leadership of the Party, who claim that the Founding Federalists were never interested in the micro affairs of the common man, but were interested in the unity of the nation as a whole. Concerns for factory work conditions, hourly pay, quality of life, are not the purview of the government. But the liberals differ in this, and believe the Federalists should continue their work for social equality.

Prominent Federalist Liberal Joshua Dalton, a Senator from Connecticut has been elected Chair, and he delivered an impassioned opening address, saying, “Liberalism is the true legacy of the Founders, not unity of the state. We must carry forward as we approach the twentieth century and continue that work, improving the lives of every American, not just the wealthy upper classes. Our nation’s prosperity is not measured by the accounts of our richest and most famous citizens, but by how we as a society take care of those less fortunate.” The address was met with thunderous applause from the more than 500 delegates in attendance.

At the heart of the conference is this question: How should liberal members of the Federalist Party proceed from this point, by trying to take over the party, or by striking it out on their own. While Chairman Dalton remains aloof on this question, several other members are not so shy. Senator Tobias Grant of New York is leading the charge to remain in the Federalist Party, feeling a separation could allow the Democrats to sweep back into power in 1880 or 1882. Leader of the so-called Separatist Faction is Pennsylvania Representative Derrick Thorn, who is also publicly supported by Women’s Suffrage advocate Elizabeth Cady-Brewer. The Suffrage movement is just one of the many social movements embraced by many of the liberal delegates gathered in Providence, but one of the best organized.
“Fracture in Federalist Party,” Manhattan Gazette, May 1, 1879.

---
The First Conference of Liberal Federalists ended on May 3, 1879, and resolved to follow the advice of Senator Tobias Grant and try and reform the Federalist Party and help it turn leftward. In the 1880 Congressional elections, a number of liberals challenged sitting party members running for reelection or those trying to unseat democrats. This was called in the Federalist press as the “Liberal Revolt,” and it largely failed. By the end of the party primaries in May of 1880, most of the liberals had failed to oust the more established candidates. This led to the Second Conference of LIberal Federalists, held in July of 1880 in Brooklyn, where the members adopted the so-called Thorn Plan, and established the new American Liberal Party. ALP members filed for office in as many they could, mostly in New England (though the ALP would soon catch on in the Black South). The would win some seats, but not enough to completely oust the Federalists from office. Instead the Liberal Revolt of 1880 cost the Federalists and Liberals control of the House, ousting Michael Follett from the First Secretary’s chair, replaced by Democrat Wade Lamar of Missouri. The Liberal Revolt is also considered a contributing factor, though far from the only one, in the failure of Federalist candidate Jeremiah Nichols in the 1882 race for the Presidency.
Sanders, Dr. Virginia. American Liberalism. Manhattan, FD, Manhattan Univ Press, 1990.

---
MANHATTAN ACT PASSED, SIGNED!

MANHATTAN- President Littlefield, in an official ceremony at Clinton Castle, signed the “Manhattan Act,” which officially declares that Manhattan Island and Governor’s Island are now the “Federal District of Manhattan,” separate from the State of New York. The Act establishes a provisional government to be constituted of a presidentially-appointed governor, and an elected assembly of 50 members, that will be elected at large. The assembly will have the power to enact laws and policy, but is subject to the governor’s veto, which can only be overruled by a 3/4ths vote of the assembly. Following the signature of the act, President Littlefield surprised a few by appointing Alexander Hamilton III, the Administrator of the island since 1863, to serve as the first Governor of Manhattan District. Many had expected Hamilton to be sacked, with some blaming him for the stagnation and slow rebuilding of the city.

All in attendance were not celebrating, however. The Friends of New York Society protested outside the Castle, calling the act a betrayal of New York. There was reportedly an effigy of Hamilton burned during this protest.
“Manhattan Act Passed, Signed!” Brooklyn Standard, August 17, 1879.

---
PRESIDENT TRAVELS TO BOREALIA

VICTORIA, KINGDOM OF BOREALIA - In a historic first, President Littlefield became the first sitting President of the United States to travel to a foreign country while in office, when he crossed the border yesterday aboard the now-famous Eagle Express, the same train he used on his inaugural tour of the nation in 1877. The Borealian Prime MInister, Anthony Martin, extended an invitation to the President last year, inviting him to tour the now nearly completed Victoria Palace, the seat of the Borealian Parliament in what had been the city of York until it was renamed in honor of the current British Monarch. The President is expected to tour the capital of our northern neighbors, and have meetings with Prime Minister Martin, Governor-General George Campbell (the official representative of the British Monarchy in Borealia and official Head of State), and several other leaders of the so-called “Kingdom of the North.”

“President Travels to Borealia,” Franklin Observer, June 2, 1880.

---
BOREALIANS PRESENT STATUE GIFT FOR MANHATTAN

VICTORIA, BOREALIA - Borealian Governor-General George Campbell, and Prime Minister Anthony Martin, presented President Littlefield a surprise gift for the American People, and more specifically for the Island of Manhattan. At a special banquet at York Manor, the official residence of the Governor-General, the Borealians presented the American delegation with the gift of a statue, entitled “Freedom Triumphant.” It depicts a woman clothed in robes, which appear to be flapping in the wind. She stands as though striding forward, and in her right hand she is lifting up a sword as if in victory, and in the other, outstretched, she holds up a lantern, the light of liberty. At her feet are broken chains and shackles.

Prime MInister Martin stated that the full statue would be over 100 feet tall, and it was the wish of the Borealian People to have this statue placed in New York Harbor, to commemorate the Second Battle of New York, where the British (largely volunteers and regulars from what is now Borealia) and Confederal forces retook the city from the Slaver Union in March of 1862. According to officials in Victoria, it will take some time for the statue, originally sculpted by Andrew Merchant, to be converted into a larger, metallic structure that will grace Manhattan, possibly close to a decade. In the meantime, the United States government can decide on where exactly in New York harbor to place the artwork.
“Borealians Present Statue Gift for Manhattan,” Manhattan Gazette, June 4, 1880.

---
HOUSE FALLS TO DEMOCRATS!

FRANKLIN - Both Houses of Congress are now in Democratic hands, following what is being called in the Federalist press as the “Liberal Revolt,” that began earlier this spring, when a number of social reformists within the the party first tried to unseat established candidates, and when that failed, established their own party, known as the American Liberal Party. The so-called ALP had modest returns for a brand new political movement, winning 27 seats. The Federalists, still the second largest party, was reduced to 88 seats, losing 45 seats in the worst reduction since the War. And while obviously 27 of those seats went to the Liberals, 18 went to the Democrats, several in districts that have not elected a Democrat in almost two generations, some for the first time ever. The Democrats now have a solid majority of 134 seats on their own, and will not have to seek Republican support to replace the First Secretary.

When asked on the result, President Littlefield stated that, “I am devastated to see division running through my party. It is bad for Federalism and bad for the country as a whole. It is my hope and prayer that myself and other Federalist leaders can reach out to Senator Dalton and the other ALP members and bring them back into the fold, and heal our fractured party before it is too late.”

Some Federalists seem to think the Rubicon has already been crossed. Now outgoing Representative from Delaware, Federalist Donald Pierce, stated that the core of the party will never forgive this stab in the back. Pierce’s district went to an ALP candidate, and for the first time in living memory, one of Delaware’s congressional Delegation will NOT be a Federalist.
“House Falls to Democrats!” Boston Eagle, November 12, 1880.

---
CENSUS: NEARLY 39 MILLION SOULS

FRANKLIN - The Federal Census Bureau announced the results of last year’s census today: The national population of the United States is now at 38,846,924. There are now 12 states that have more than 1 million people, up from 7 in 1870. Furthermore, of those 12 states with more than 1 million people, 3 have more than 2 million (the same 3 in 1870, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania). New York remains the most populous state, at roughly 3.8 million people. Several states are on the verge of passing either the 1 million or the 2 million mark. Many believe, with increasing immigration and increasing birth rates, the population could nearly double by 1890. In the 1882 election, the House of Representatives will increase to 379 seats (388, if Georgia is finally admitted back into the Union, an issue President Littlefield has stated he plans on addressing before the end of his term).
“Census: Nearly 39 Million Souls,” Franklin Observer, April 2, 1881.


---
PRESIDENT SIGNS CONGRESS’S GEORGIA ULTIMATUM!

FRANKLIN - The Georgia Act, proposed by Democrats from Tennessee and Kentucky, and passed last week by both the House and the Senate, has been signed by President LIttlefield. Now, the still unrepentant state of Georgia is on a definitive deadline. Georgians now have until the November 1882 election to pass a reformed constitution recognizing the Federal Constitutional changes passed in the wake of the War. Failure to do so, according to the new law, will result in the state being dissolved and the territory given to neighboring states. There is expected to be a legal challenge, and the law has a clause that if this outcome is deemed unconstitutional, that the alternative will be for the State of Georgia to be ejected from the Union, and all land borders between Georgia and the United States to be sealed, and all other forms of direct trade between Georgia and the United States to be prohibited, effectively dooming Georgia to poverty.
“President Signs Congress’s Georgia Ultimatum!” Franklin Observer, April 29, 1881.

---
ENGLISHMAN MAKES AIRSHIP FLIGHT

LONDON - English inventor Peter Hightower has successfully piloted his motorized observation balloon, which he calls an “airship,” specifically the Avalon, in a 12 mile, 20 minute flight outside the British capital. Hightower was commissioned by the British Navy to develop a working design to have a motorized observation balloon that they believe would be more useful than stationary models currently employed by military services around the world. Hightower stated that “this is the first true flight of man, where a human being was in direct control of the craft, when compared to the common balloon where the occupants are at the whims of the air.”

Experts believe this could revolutionize military balloon use, and has application beyond making military observations. Such craft could be used to drop bombs or shoot at enemy soldiers from a safe distance. Also, some hope to see these craft used for civilian use, possibly in delivering mail or supplies to hard to reach places.
“Englishman Makes Airship Flight,” Boston Eagle, September 3, 1881.

---
GEORGIA CONVENTION APPROVES CONSTITUTION

ATLANTA - The Georgian Constitutional Convention, convened reluctantly by state leaders who had hoped to hold out long enough for the Federal occupation to just end, and allow the original constitution to be kept, has now ended, following the delegates approving the new constitution that allows for legal equality and officially recognizes the end of slavery. Elections will be held in June for statewide offices, and Georgia will vote in November to elect new members of Congress, for the first time in twenty years. Once the statewide elections are held in June, Federal occupation of the state will end. Already, units are packing up and preparing to leave, to the celebration of locals.
“Georgia Convention Approves Constitution,” Charleston Examiner, February 13, 1882.

---
FED SPLIT CONTINUES, ALP TO HOLD SEPARATE CONVENTION

BOSTON - The American Liberal Party, established two years ago by disgruntled leftist members of the Federalist Party, will hold their own, separate political convention to elect a presidential candidate in August, the week after the Federalist Convention is supposed to be held in Brooklyn, New York. Many members of the Federalist Party, President Littlefield included, now fear that this split could cost the Party control of any part of the government. ALP leader Senator Joshua Dalton of Connecticut stated that, “the cause of liberalism and social reform has outgrown the confines of the Federalist Party, and must permanently be planted in its own, larger garden. We will not change course.” Senator Dalton believes his party does have a chance at winning Washington House, despite most who claim that all a separate ALP presidential candidate will do is hand the presidency to the Democrats.
“Fed Split Continues, ALP to Hold Separate Convention,” Brooklyn Standard, May 19, 1882.

---
DRAKE TAKES MOST ELECTORS, SHORT OF MAJORITY

FRANKLIN - Federal election officials have announced that Democratic candidate Governor Theodore Drake of Iowa and his running mate Beuford Scott have won the most electors in the 1882 presidential election, winning 181 out of a possible 452 electors, shy of the 227 electors needed for a majority. Federalist Representative Jeremiah Nichols of Rhode Island and his running mate Jonathan Pendleton of Maine received 166 electors. ALP Candidate Senator Joshua Dalton of Connecticut and running mate Governor Terrance Cole of Mississippi received 74 electors, and Republican Senator Christopher Hampton of Dixiana and running mate Senator Kevin Baxter of South Carolina received 31. Under the 20th Amendment, the candidate with the lowest number of electors is allowed to give those elector to another candidate. In this case, that would be Senator Hampton. Most expect him to give his electors to Governor Drake, which would give him 212, which would still leave him 15 votes shy of the majority needed.

The question now is whether or not Senator Dalton will give his 74 electors to Representative Nichols, giving him 240 electors and the presidency. There has been a lot of bad blood between the Federalists and the Liberals, so it is not something that can be easily predicted.
“Dawson Takes Most Electors, Short of Majority,” Franklin Observer, November 15, 1882.

---
DALTON SIDES WITH DRAKE, STEALS PRESIDENCY FROM NICHOLS

HARTFORD, CT - Liberal Presidential Candidate, Senator Joshua Dalton, today announced that he is giving his 74 electors to Democratic Presidential Candidate Governor Theodore Drake of Iowa, giving Governor Drake 255 electors, more than enough to win the election. In his announcement, given on the steps of the Connecticut Capitol Building, the senator said, "While I have many disagreements with the Democrats, I believe Governor Drake to be an honest man. Furthermore, I believe that the time of the Federalist Party is drawing to a close, and I do not wish to help it limp along any further. More Americans voted for the governor than for any other candidate, which to me is a clear sign that they want a change in leadership at in Franklin, and I will not stand in the way of that." Federalists nation-wide are crying foul at Dalton, who had been a Federalist himself up until 1880 when he helped found the American Liberal Party.

Not all Liberals agree with the decision, and many newly-elected Liberal congressmen and senators are vowing to fight the Democrats in Franklin wherever they can, despite the fact that the Democrats have an absolute majority again in the House at 194 out of 386 seats, and combined with the Republicans also control the Senate.
“Dalton Sides With Drake, Steals Presidency From Nichols,” Boston Eagle, December 1, 1882.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some Notes:

1) The Population: Still about 10 years behind OTL, but considering less territory, I think that's okay for right now. I suspect that by 1890, 1900 at the latest, it will be about equal to the OTL population, give or take a million or so.
2) Fed/Lib Split: I felt that at it's core, the Federalists are going to side more with the industrialists, the big movers and shakers, over the little guy. Slavery was a moral issue that the Founders had mostly been drifting away from supporting, so that was a natural extension, but things like women's rights and worker's rights are too far, so the social reformers who'd been Federalist because of abolition would not stay. What this means for the long term is harder to say.
3) Owenites: Robert Owen and New Harmony, Indiana. Basically, have that as a success, and we will say that Owen is convinced to screen his recruits for his experiment, meaning better quality of people and more skilled labor help the colony succeed and possibly be replicated. I'm working on the idea that Owenites and others will eventually form some American form of Communism. How popular it will be...eh, I'm not sure.
4) Georgia: The whole mess was a legally gray area, and definitely uncharted territory, so I came up with the either/or ultimatum as a way to cover the bases.
5) Freedom's Hymn: sounds similar to Battlehymn of the Republic of OTL.

As always, let me know what you think, ask questions, and give suggestions. I enjoy the feedback and also it often helps me decide on certain details (remember, when this whole project got started the capital was going to move to Philadelphia or New York until someone recommended the site of modern Cincinnati, so your suggestions matter :) )

Enjoy! (and as promised, posted by mid-day :) )
 
Last edited:
Great update!

I like where the capital is. My dad grew up in Cincinnati.

As for the party stuff, I'd prefer something akin to the UK's party system. Where there are two major parties and multiple little parties. Usually.

RIP Austria.

Perhaps go for Großdeustcheland? Without the other parts of empire Austria is ripe for the picking. Maybe a deal where Austria can keep its government, but accept the annexation by Germany.

Have Victoria apply pressure for USA adopt women's suffrage.
 
Great update!

I like where the capital is. My dad grew up in Cincinnati.

Thanks! And yeah, I like the capital there as well. Keeps things from being too concentrated in one area, like it is now OTL (which nowadays isn't as big an issue, but back in the 19th century, it definitely was.)

As for the party stuff, I'd prefer something akin to the UK's party system. Where there are two major parties and multiple little parties. Usually.

That's *probably* where we will end up. But it may look different than where the TL is now. As far as the political spectrum goes, the Republicans are the farthest right (though, not actually being what we would consider "far right"), then the Dems are fairly centrist, Federalists are going to start drifting back to the center too, but they stand for different issues so I'm not sure if they will work together or not. Then after those two are the Liberals, and then at the far left are the Owenites and other fringe communalist groups.

I'm thinking about looking into "christian communism" as well, as I think that will play better broadly speaking compared to the more secular forms of communism popular OTL.

RIP Austria.

Perhaps go for Großdeustcheland? Without the other parts of empire Austria is ripe for the picking. Maybe a deal where Austria can keep its government, but accept the annexation by Germany.

Yeah, Austria is gone. After the defeat by the Prussians, and with poor leadership, things were just not looking good.

I'm considering that. The only current problems with such a course is 1) it wouldn't really be Großdeutschland so much as Großpreußen, and 2) the Austrians have adopted a pretty liberal form of democracy, so I can't see them readopting Prussian style monarchy, even if Frederick V is a moderate. Now, if Prussia decides to invade and the Austrians loose...thats another story altogether. :)

Have Victoria apply pressure for USA adopt women's suffrage.
SHHHH!!! Stop giving away spoilers! ;)
OK so I might not be doing EXACTLY that, but you're getting close. Victoria will have a part to play in the larger international story of women's suffrage. And that will help put some pressure on the American government. Though a national suffrage law in the USA might not come to fruition until the reign of Victoria II, but I'm getting ahead of myself :)
 
The ALP seems to be an analogue of the OTL Progressive Republicans, while the Federalists look like the business-friendly Taftite wing of the Republican Party of OTL late XIX century.
The Owenites sound a bit like pre-Marx forms of Socialism.
 
The ALP seems to be an analogue of the OTL Progressive Republicans, while the Federalists look like the business-friendly Taftite wing of the Republican Party of OTL late XIX century.
The Owenites sound a bit like pre-Marx forms of Socialism.

Ding ding! Right on both counts, more or less. :)
 
Excellent update! :cool:

I really enjoyed reading about Littlefeild's presidency, the new developments in American politics, the break-up of the Austrian Empire, airships, among other things. One thing I would like to mention though is that Romania and Serbia would not have rebelled against Austria, as they were under Ottoman control at the time. Maybe at around the same time IITL, in other words during the late 1870s/early 1880s, there were Romanian and Serbian revolutions and wars of independence against against the Ottoman Empire.

I have some questions; what happened to Galicia-Lodomeria? I'm guessing it was annexed by Russia. What happened to Veneto? Did it become its own republic? Lastly, whats the Italian Union? Is it like an Italian version of the German Confederation?
 
Excellent update! :cool:

I really enjoyed reading about Littlefeild's presidency, the new developments in American politics, the break-up of the Austrian Empire, airships, among other things. One thing I would like to mention though is that Romania and Serbia would not have rebelled against Austria, as they were under Ottoman control at the time. Maybe at around the same time IITL, in other words during the late 1870s/early 1880s, there were Romanian and Serbian revolutions and wars of independence against against the Ottoman Empire.

I have some questions; what happened to Galicia-Lodomeria? I'm guessing it was annexed by Russia. What happened to Veneto? Did it become its own republic? Lastly, whats the Italian Union? Is it like an Italian version of the German Confederation?

Glad you liked it!

So, I goofed on the Austrian Empire break up, I looked for a map of the empire showing it's nationalities, and I didn't think to check the time of the map. As for Galicia-Lodomeria....I overlooked that one, so I'll have to get back to you about that. Same with Veneto, I'll have to look into that.

The Italian Union, yes that's sort of like the German Confederation. Italy isn't as unified as it was OTL, but it is slowly moving that way. I'll be honest and say I haven't fleshed out all the details of that yet. But yes, some loose sort of union.

Thanks for pointing out the stuff I messed up, I'll try and get that fixed soon :)
 
So just wanted to check in.

Unfortunately, it may be a bit before the next update. I am about to embark on a trip later today and will be traveling for a solid month. I hope to do some writing during that time, but it will be hit or miss and not my number one priority while I'm taking in the sites and sounds of Europe. But I am ruminating on some ideas and hopefully will have something to post before August.

Also open to suggestions. I have some idea where things are going to go, but definitely would love to have help filling out the details. I'm writing this for the enjoyment of the readers as much as for myself, so feel free to speak up. :)
 
I'm back!

Hoping to have an update out within a week. Have some ideas that I've been kicking around on my trip that I hope to write down and flesh out soon. Looking in particular at technological development, as we are now entering the end of the 19th century and should start discussing the advent of technology we now take for granted in the present, such as automobiles, telephones, cinematography, radio, electrification, etc.

In particular, I'm kicking around the idea of the automobile market not standardizing on internal combustion engines, at least not uniformly. In particular, I was thinking of having Texas be more IC engines, and see the development of steam-powered cars in the more coal-reliant USA, at least for awhile (admittedly, I have a soft spot for steamers). It won't be clear cut at the boarders, you will see IC engines used in the US, especially in Kansaw, Arkansas, Louisiana, Jefferson, Dixiana, etc.... areas closer to Texas. But IC engines won't dominate and control the market as early, if at all (still debating).

No specific ideas yet on the other tech (but open to suggestions and ideas, along with things I may have overlooked that would also be important in this era).

Hoping to look at the wider world too. More detail on what is going on under the Reformer Queen, and women's suffrage in Britain. Also a look at the breakup of the Austrian Empire, and also how Prussia will react....could lead to a war there, not sure yet. If so it will probably be over Bavaria. Farther afield, need to start looking at Africa, and Asia as well (specifically the opening of Japan, and what is going on in China - an area I'm not very knowledgeable in so I'm very open to ideas or suggestions there).

Any other questions or things you'd like to see me address or include, let me know! :)
 
Okay so taking a look at inventors, Edison was born in 1847 in Ohio, so he's more than likely been butterflied away (though I'm been somewhat selective with butterflies so that's not a for sure thing. But with all the differences in demographics, plus the capital being basically in Ohio, I find it unlikely that Edison would "come through unscathed," as it were. Seems most likely that he will not exist as the same man as OTL, if he exists at all. Any suggestions for an alternate, or should I "invent" someone, like I have with many other areas?
 
Chapter 13: The Drake Presidency, 1883-1889
--- The Drake Presidency (1883-1889) ---

In his inaugural address on the steps of the Congress Hall in March of 1883, President Theodore Drake declared that the era of “imperial, overreaching government,” was over. Drake had campaigned on being the anti-Littlefield, promising to stay in Franklin and do his job quietly and effectively and not aggrandize the office to which he now humbly entered. Democrats had bemoaned the expense and extravagance of the Littlefield Presidency, from the national tour, the trip to Borealia, the large parties to entertain officials both foreign and domestic, and his plans (never approved) to refurbish and upgrade Washington House. Drake promised smaller government, lower taxes, and less interference in the daily running of the nation from above. And he held true to those promises, even when the realities facing the nation demanded more, which is why the Democrats were not able to retain control of Washington House once Drake’s term ended.
Preston, Dr. Horace, Drake: The Dull Man from the Plains. Des Moines: IU Press, 1935.


BUDGET AND TAX CUTS PASS CONGRESS
FRANKLIN - President Drake’s drastic tax and budget cuts have passed both houses of the Democrat-controlled Congress, much to the chagrin of the Federalists and Liberals. President Drake declared the vote a victory of the average American and of the individual states, who would be free from mandates from the Federal government as part of some of the budget reduction.

The cuts only barely passed the Senate, however, due to some Democratic senators in the West worrying about the cuts to the FBI, which has been the lifeblood of ensuring continued western migration. Delegations from the western territories pleaded with the President not to insist on cutting the FBI’s budget nearly in half, meaning that any expansions of the National Road Network or the Federal Railway Network all but impossible. Furthermore, according to the new budget, some areas of maintenance will now be the responsibility of the states, not the Federal government.
“Budget and Tax Cuts Pass Congress,” Brooklyn Standard, June 9, 1883.

Gottlieb Daimler immigrated to what is now the Texas Federation as part of the mass exodus of the 45ers, at 11 years old, with his parents who had supported the German Republic. Daimler had shown a fascination with engineering even before his move to Texas, and his parents made sure to enroll him in the best school in Neu Frankfurt to continue his education. Following the end of the of the Second Mexican War Daimler left Texas in 1852, having served as a gunsmith’s apprentice during the fighting, and travelled to the United States to pursue mechanical engineering, ending up at the University of the United States in Franklin, where, in 1856, he graduated with an engineering degree.

For over ten years, he worked for the United States Railway Company, before he moved back to Texas to work for a private Texas railway firm that was partnered with USRC. Daimler was then introduced to another German immigrant, a relative latecomer to Texas, Karl Benz, who’d left poor prospects in Greater Bavaria for a better life in America. Benz had a keen interest in mechanics, and had been working for the railway for 3 years when Daimler arrived in 1869. The two began to talk about their varied mechanical and engineering ideas, and that was the birth of what would become one of the greatest automotive dynasties in history.
Happer, Colton. The Daimler-Benz Empire. Neu Frankfurt: NFVerlag, 2009.

PETERSEN DISPLAYS NEW SWAN LIGHTS
MANHATTAN - Famed inventor Silas Petersen has presented a new, improved form of the famous “swan lights,” the incandescent light bulbs created by British inventor Joseph Swan in 1878. Swan awed the world last year with his display of the bulbs in London, lighting the whole of Her Majesty’s Theater. Petersen has stated that he is hoping to work out a viable design for inexpensive, commercially available lights. Petersen surprised the local business leaders of Manhattan and Brooklyn and Federal officials working at Clinton Castle when he illuminated the entire seaside street where his workshop is located, on the east shore of Manhattan Island. Locals in Brooklyn and sailors on the East River reported that they could see spectacle as well.

“Some day, it is my firm belief, that these new lights will brighten the whole world, every street and every home. Today, Brooklyn Boulevard, tomorrow, the main street of a small town in Kanasaw. Electric light is the way of the future.”
“Petersen Displays New Swan Lights,” Brooklyn Standard, September 9, 1883.

LOWERY STEAMER WOWS PITTSBURG
PITTSBURG - Tinkerer Julius Lowery has unveiled his newest invention, the so-called horseless steamer carriage, which he has filed paperwork for with the patent office in Franklin. Lowery drove the car from his stable workshop to the main road of town and back, taking about an hour to make the trip.
“Lowery Steamer Wows Pittsburg,” Philadelphia Inquirer, March 11, 1884.

DEMS LOSE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY IN HOUSE
FRANKLIN - The Democrats will have to seek the support of the Republican party to retain control of the First Secretary’s office, loosing 23 seats and now standing at 172 seats from what had been an absolute majority. The Republicans remain the same, at 29 seats. The Federalists are now down to 80 seats, and the Liberals have surged to 104. The Senate will also likely remain in the hands of the Democrats, albeit with the assistance of the Republicans.
“Dems Lose Absolute Majority in House,” Franklin Observer, November 12, 1884.

REPUBLICANS REFUSE BAXTER
FRANKLIN - In a rare flex of political muscle not seen since the War Between the States, the leaders of the Republican party have told Democrats that they are refusing to vote for the reelection of Kenneth Baxter as First Secretary. Baxter has been unpopular with the Republicans since he took office in 1883, having been a long-time opponent to the Democrats working in league with the Republicans, and gleefully rubbed that in when the Democrats enjoyed an absolute majority after the 1882 election. They have stated their candidate is Democrat James Cleveland of Jefferson. Some members of the Democrats have balked at this attempt by the Republicans. Mr. Cleveland is not the most liked among the Congressional Democrats.

Some have suggested that the Democrats team up with the Liberals, which would be quite a change but also quite an unexpected pairing, and it is unsure if the Liberals would support Baxter, or if they would insist on a different candidate as well.
“Republicans Refuse Baxter,” Boston Eagle, March 1, 1885

BAXTER OUT, CLEVELAND IN
FRANKLIN - Despite the defection of several Democrats who refused to vote for him, James Cleveland of Jefferson has been elected as the next First Secretary and Speaker of the House, with every Republican and most of the Democrats supporting him. Despite earlier grumblings from Washington House about “being held hostage by the Republican vipers out West,” President Drake seems to be putting forward an olive branch, inviting the new First Secretary to a special dinner in his honor at the executive mansion.
“Baxter Out, Cleveland In,” Brooklyn Standard, March 20, 1885.

CLAYMORE PLANTATION TO FOLD
GEORGETOWN - A victim of the larger economic downturn across the nation, Claymore Capital Plantation has announced its closure and plans to sell of the estate in the hopes of settling last debts. The owner, Gregory Claymore II, stated that there was no way to keep the estate in the ownership of the family. He said he hopes to have all the estate sold to one party, but this seems unlikely, as most remaining plantations across the parts of the South that survived the turmoil after the War are now being sold off in pieces.

The members of the Georgetown Preservation Society, a relatively new group that is seeking to preserve the historic past of the area, that is asking the state of Maryland to step in and purchase some parts of the estate. Specifically, they are seeking to save the plantation house, which was built in the ruins of the old Presidential Mansion from the failed city of Washington, and the ruins of the old Capitol building, which had been preserved by the Claymores (supposedly on the intention to eventually build a larger mansion there, a plan that never materialized). No word yet if the society will be able to achieve this.
“Claymore Plantation to Fold,” Baltimore Courier, May 7, 1885.

RAIL DISASTER IN OREGON
ASTORIA - After exceedingly high spring rains damaged the Federal rail line along the Columbia River, a large passenger train has crashed into the river, and it is estimated that nearly 100 people have died, possibly more. Oregonian officials have stated that they knew that section of the line was in need of repairs, but had been trying to secure the proper funds, since the FBI’s budget had been gutted two years prior. Federalist and Liberal members of Congress, along with a few Western Democrats, are calling for an investigation, and others are calling for a restoration of the FBI’s funds. President Drake stated that the disaster was an “unforeseen and unavoidable tragedy, proof that mankind’s civilization and progress are still at the beck and call of God’s natural forces.”
“Rail Disaster in Oregon,” Franklin Observer, May 27, 1885.

The 1885 Flu Epidemic struck the United States and parts of Northern Europe very hard. It is estimated that over half a million people in the US alone perished between September of 1885 and February of 1886, including the two young sons of American President Theodore Drake. The young seemed particularly susceptible to the disease. Making things worse, President Drake refused calls for Federal intervention, to set up quarantines on a national level, or to help fund special hospitals. Throughout it all, Drake maintained that this was out of the hands of men, that he could not interfere, and that it wasn’t the government's place. This attitude had drastic consequences for US politics and policy for years to come. The Department of Health and the federal hospital system are a direct result of the epidemic and Drake’s refusal to act.
Gibbons, Dr. Jake. Politics of Illness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.

DEMS COLLAPSE AT THE POLLS
FRANKLIN - Seen largely as a response to the Democrats inaction during the previous year’s Flu crisis, along with the Columbia River disaster, the Federalists and Liberals enjoyed a large electoral victory against President Drake’s party. The Liberals are 9 seats away from absolute majority control of the House, and it is expected they will be able to find the support from Federalists to put their candidate in the position of First Secretary. Derrick Thorn seems to be the most likely Liberal candidate in the House to be nominated, though it is possible that Connecticut representative Jackson Young or Massachusetts representative Phillip McNally could also secure the position.
“Dems Collapse at the Polls,” Boston Eagle, November 11, 1886.

THORN SWORN IN AS FIRST SECRETARY
FRANKLIN - In a rare turn of political events, the Drake Administration has become the first to have three different First Secretaries. Over half the Federalists joined the Liberals in electing Derrick Thorn, representative from Pennsylvania and one of the founders of the American Liberal Party. Following the swearing in, Mr. Thorn road down Union Avenue to present himself to President Drake. Drake greeted him at the main entrance on President’s Square, and looked positively unhappy to do so.

The political winds of the nation have shifted violently since the crises last year, and many voters appear to be angry at the President’s party for their inaction, inaction that was all but mandated from Washington House.
“Thorn Sworn in as First Secretary,” Franklin Observer, March 12, 1887.

FEMALE VOTE PASSES IN MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON - The “Liberal Wave” that swept across the country last fall produced a State Assembly and governor that are all members of the Liberal Party, and they have now succeeded in coming through on their first promise: to pass a bill allowing female suffrage. The law simply changes existing statutes to where, instead of saying “man,” they now say, “man or woman.” Now, any person, regardless of race or sex, can vote in the state of Massachusetts as long as they have reached 21 years of age and are a legal resident of the state.

Despite this victory, many Liberals feel it is a hollow one. Women are still not allowed to run for office in the state (though there seems to be enough political will and power to possibly change this before the next state election), and of course women will not be able to vote in Federal elections, something that the Attorney General of the United States stated repeatedly when asked during the discussion of this change. The National Women’s Suffrage Association has already promised to sue the Federal Government for the right of Massachusetts women to vote for representatives from that state.
“Female Vote Passes in Massachusetts,” Brooklyn Standard, May 20, 1887.

CONGRESS PROPOSES NATIONAL HEALTH BUREAU
FRANKLIN - The Liberal members of Congress have proposed the creation of a national health service that would help, in the opinion of said members, mitigate future health crises such as the one the nation went through in 1885. First Secretary Thorn stated that he fully supports such a plan, and will do all he can to see it through. Benjamin Brooke, the President’s assistant, stated that President Drake does not support such a plan, and would likely veto any such proposal. It has only been three months since Thorn and the Liberals took over Congress, and we are already seeing the brewing of what could be a major fight between the executive and legislative branches of government.
“Congress Proposes National Health Bureau,” Franklin Observer, May 30, 1887.

CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ON STATUE PEDESTAL
MANHATTAN - The first stone has been laid at the south end of Manhattan Island for what will become the pedestal for the “Freedom Triumphant” statue that is due to be delivered next year by the Borealian government, a gift to commemorate the 1862 Second Battle of Manhattan. Governor Hamilton presided over the ceremony, and stated that, “as this stone is placed, may it be a marker of the true renaissance of this great city. By the time Freedom Triumphant sits atop its lofty perch, Manhattan will once again be one of the great cities of America, indeed of the world.”
“Construction Begins on Statue Pedestal,” Manhattan Gazette, June 7, 1887.

PRINCESS VICTORIA SPEAKS FOR SUFFRAGE
BOSTON - Crown Princess Victoria Alexandra, the eldest daughter of Queen Victoria and heir to the British throne, arrived in Boston to speak to pro-suffragist crowds and to celebrate the recent victory in that state. The Princess has been a vocal proponent of the women’s suffrage movement in Britain, where some think the franchise may be granted to women before the end of the century thanks to the public support of the princess and the tacit, if unspoken, support of Queen Victoria. Her Royal Highness stated that, “This, the birthplace of the American Revolution, has now become the birthplace of a new American movement, the Revolution of Women. It is my prayer and hope that by the time our daughters, women will be equal with men before the law all over this Earth, just as they already are before God.”

The Princess stopped in Boston, unannounced, after a three week visit to Borealia with her husband, Prince Thomas. Some speculate that there may be repercussions at Buckingham Palace upon their return, as the Queen has repeatedly called on her daughter to not be so open in the engagement of the suffrage movement, this despite the fact that Her Majesty herself was politically engaged in women’s rights in advocating for the liberalization of inheritance law to include first born daughters.
“Princess Victoria Speaks for Suffrage,” Brooklyn Standard, July 1, 1887.

After nearly thirty years, the city of Manhattan finally turned a corner in the late 1880s, having languished for years after the War Between the States, in constant need of funds that had been in short supply. Starting with the Federal takeover in 1879, the island became a boom town, with Federal money ensuring that infrastructure needs were met, such as the paving of primary and even secondary roads, the construction or completion of city buildings such as city hall and the municipal courts, schools and libraries and even a theater. In 1888, plans were finally approved for a long demanded bridge to connect Manhattan and Brooklyn, paid for equally by the City of Brooklyn and the District of Manhattan. Construction on the now famous Brooklyn Bridge would begin in 1890 and take 4 years, linking the “twin cities of New York.”

Proper sewage systems were also implemented, becoming a model for the nation. In 1888, plans were also approved of for an underground train network to link the island together, a project that would take over a decade and a half to initially complete, but one that has endured to this day. The workshops of inventor Silas Petersen also began to attract many different businessmen to the city, and with them financial institutions as well. Brooklyn would remain the larger city for several more decades, but by the time Alexander Hamilton III died in 1890, he could rest in peace knowing he’d saved Manhattan.
Doughty, Dr. Howard. The Twins: A History of Manhattan and Brooklyn. Brooklyn: BU Press, 2001.

DRAKE VETOES HEALTH LAW, THORN VOWS OVERTURN
FRANKLIN - President Drake has vetoed the “National Health and Safety Act,” which would have established the Federal Bureau of Health, and set up regulations on various health issues around the country, and paved the way for Federally operated or funded hospitals, and possibly Federally-funded health services for the poor. This law was a compromise between Liberals and Federalists, and is not quite as radical as the original Liberal proposal. Regardless, Drake had promised from the start of debate he would likely veto any such law as he felt it would be a “gross overreach of the federal government,” and he was true to his word. However, this does not seem to be the end of the battle. It is expected that by early next week First Secretary Thorn will have enough votes to overturn the President’s veto.
“Drake Vetoes Health Law, Thorn Vows Overturn,” Boston Eagle, September 9, 1887.

HEALTH ACT NOW LAW
FRANKLIN - Despite President Drake’s veto last week, the “National Health and Safety Act” is now law, thanks to a veto override that First Secretary Thorn guided through Congress last week. The law establishes the Federal Bureau of Health, which will be headquartered in the capital, and will likely be in operation by the end of the year. The law was written with Presidential inaction in mind, and the director of the Bureau can be appointed by Congress if the president does not give a nominee, so the Drake Administration will not be able to thwart the full creation of the office. Some fear that the president may appoint someone who will stall efforts to establish the new agency, but others have pointed out that even if this occurs, that can only last until 1889, at which point there will be a new president, and the chances are good that man may be a Liberal, or at the very least a Federalist sympathetic to the new bureau.
“Health Act Now Law,” Franklin Observer, September 15, 1887.

BRITAIN’S PRINCE CONSORT, HUSBAND OF VICTORIA, DEAD AT 70
LONDON - Two days ago, on January 11, Prince Alexander, the husband of Queen Victoria, passed away at Windsor Castle, likely from complications from a recent bout of pneumonia. Wailing from the monarch has been reported by members of the Household staff, and the Prime Minister announced a long state of mourning at the loss of the Queen’s spouse and father of the future Queen of England. Upon word of this tragedy reaching Franklin, the flag above the British embassy was lowered to half staff in a sign of mourning. President Drake is said to have telegraphed his condolences to the Queen.
“Britain’s Prince Consort, Husband of Victoria, Dead at 70,” Franklin Observer, January 13, 1888.

DRAKE TAX CUTS END
FRANKLIN - In yet another show of strength by the Liberal-controlled Congress, President Drake’s veto of the new law ending the tax cuts introduced in 1883 has been overturned, and Federal taxes will go back to their pre-cut levels at the first of next year. This is but one more in a series of recent blows against the Drake Administration, and political observers in the capital believe that Gregory Nollert, the popular liberal writer from Massachusetts who is ahead in the party primary vote so far, has a fair shot of beating either Democratic frontrunners, Victor Grover of Indiana, or Harrison Ford of New York. It is possible that Federalist Senator Leeland Rowling of Pennsylvania might be more of a challenger to Nollert, but only time will tell.
“Drake Tax Cuts End,” Franklin Observer, April 12, 1888.


TRIPLE STATEHOODS APPROVED
FRANKLIN - After over a year of haggling, Congress has approved of statehood for Platte, Metropotamia, and Lakota, ending a process that has been languishing in a divided Congress. The Liberals had continued to use the prospect of statehood for territories that most likely will swing towards the Democrats as a tool of leverage against their counterparts in the House, but finally President Drake was able to convince First Secretary Thorn to stop using this tactic, reportedly after a long meeting late last week at Washington House.

Lakotans in particular are celebrating, as their statehood has been long in coming, having been promised to be fast-tracked back in 1866 after the Upper Louisiana Territorial Reorganization Act established the 5 western territories, something that successive administrations have ignored for one reason or another. Many representatives from Gigadohi and Kanasaw have told the press that they believe that their white counterparts in Congress feared adding a third native nations state into the Union and so continued to postpone Lakota’s admission into the Union until more of the non-native territories filled up. Whatever the reason, the waiting has ended, and these states will also be joining the Union just in time to participate in the upcoming presidential race.
“Triple Statehood Aproved,” Franklin Observer, July 4, 1888.

The 1888 race for Washington House saw a return to the 1876 race that propelled Horace Littlefield into the nation’s highest office. However, this time all three major candidates campaigned at a madman’s pace, using the trains to visit cities and towns across the nation. And both Gregory Nollert of the Liberal Party and Leeland Rowling of the Federalists drew out the largest crowds, and many considered them in a near dead heat by October of 1888. Democrat Harrison Ford tried to keep up, campaigning as being a total opposite of the inactive Theodore Drake, but was unable to shake the shadow of the unpopular sitting president. Nollert and his running mate Franklin Webber of Ohio promised to be a complete 180 degree change from Drake, to reinvigorate the national government in the march towards progress. Rowling and his running mate, Jefferson Young of Missouri, promised to be involved, unlike Drake, but to check the Liberal’s march for an even larger Federal government. “Our Founders,” said Rowling at a rally in St. Louis, “conceived of a strong central government. But the did not wish for one that would upset the order of society or stick it’s fingers in every pie.”

What would ultimately tip the scales, in the opinion of many historians looking back at the election, would be the comments made at one of the first ever presidential debates held in Manhattan between Nollert and Rowling on October 2, 1888. The story of what both candidates said would travel far and wide before election day, and people who were asked afterwards what helped them decide to settle their vote pointed to the debate.
Gilbert, Dr. Anthony. The Power of Debate: The Election of 1888. Franklin, DW: UUS Press House, 1988.

NOLLERT ADMITS ATHEISM IN DEBATE
MANHATTAN - In what is being described as the political gaffe of the century, the liberal candidate for President, Gregory Nollert, admitted to not believing in God during a debate in Manhattan on Friday. The debate had turned to domestic policy, and the Liberal Party’s support of women’s suffrage and freedom of divorce and other radical social policies. Federalist candidate Leeland Rowling had fired back at Nollert’s support for these issues, saying, “You and your party, if you were to enact your full agenda, would totally toss on its ear the natural order ordained by God, and could be guilty of bringing divine judgement on us all.” Nollert responed by saying, “I’m running for President of the United States because I am concerned with governing in the best interests of the people, not because I am concerned about some supposed divine action.” Rowland, the son of a preacher, seemed to almost gasp, and asked, “You don’t fear divine action sir? Do you not fear God?” “No,” Nollert replied, and the crowd gasped, and he then continued, “No, I know of no God which makes me fearful of our platform. We seek the betterment of mankind, not being shackled by old interpretations of scripture, divine or otherwise.” The debate went on from there, but the crowd was stunned and shifted noticeably in Rowling’s favor. There are many openly atheist persons affiliated with the Liberal Party, and it would seem that Mr. Nollert is among them.
“Nollert Admits Atheism in Debate,” Franklin Observer, October 5, 1888.

For almost two weeks after the Manhattan debate, Gregory Nollert attempted to ignore the so-called “gaffe of the century” and focus on policy. Finally, on October 18th, he issued a statement, saying, “my words in Manhattan were poorly spoken and misinterpreted, as I was in the heat of the debate and didn’t give myself time for clearer thought. I of course believe in the Almighty, and believe his hand is involved in things that cannot be explained by man. But I believe that we mere humans have an imperfect understanding of His will, and I believe the Liberal Party platform is not in conflict with the divine.” This statement, while picked up in the press, did little to quell the doubts in people’s minds once they’d read about the initial debate. This gaffe, combined with some people’s unease with parts of the Liberal platform, helped to sink Nollert’s chances for the presidency.
Gilbert, Dr. Anthony. The Power of Debate: The Election of 1888. Franklin, DW: UUS Press House, 1988.

ROWLING WINS LANDSLIDE ELECTION
FRANKLIN - Leeland Rowling will be the next President of the United States. He has secured 238 electoral votes, 7 more than the required 231 to win, meaning that he does not need any of the other candidates to gift him their electors in order to become the 19th President. Gregory Nollert, who up until the “gaffe heard ‘round the world” last month had been neck and neck with Rowling, comes in at a distant 104 electoral votes. Democrat Harrison Ford came in a at just 72 electoral votes, the lowest electoral return for the party since 1828, and likely a direct result of President Drake’s low popularity. Republican candidate Benjamin Conroy earned 45 electoral votes.
“Rowling Wins Landslide Election,” Boston Eagle, November 9, 1888.

The fallout from the “gaffe,” also touched the 1888 congressional elections, as did the Democrats inability to distance themselves from Drake. The Federalists took an absolute majority in the House with 198 seats, something they hadn’t enjoyed in over a decade, and the Democrats were reduced to just 48 seats, only four more than the Republicans, their worst showing ever. The Liberals of course took a hit too, dropping from their astounding 186 seats they had won in 1886 to 91 seats, but still the second largest party in the House. It was also interesting to note that in Indiana and Illinois, many Liberals lost their seats not to Federalists, but to Owenites, who had 8 seats after the 1888 election.
Nollert effectively retired after the failure in 1888. He felt he’d done the party irreparable damage in the “Great Debate of 1888.” He wrote no more books or articles, and faded into obscurity in his home outside Boston. However, he was wrong about the level of damage done. Congressional elections in 1890 and 1892 would see the party retake many seats it lost, and the Liberal party would become what it is today, one of the leading parties in the United States, by the turn of the 20th centuries.
Gilbert, Dr. Anthony. The Power of Debate: The Election of 1888. Franklin, DW: UUS Press House, 1988.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No real notes on this one, other than I changed the next president from a vaguely mentioned "President Baldwin" in the previous update to Rowling (I've edited the previous chapter as well).

Questions, critiques, and suggestions welcomed as always. Now that this update is done I'm going to turn my attention to the rest of the world a bit before we return for the 1889-1895 update.
 
Last edited:
Is Fort Wood on what's know in OTL as Liberty Island still an active military base? I'm guessing that paranoia regarding a future invasion of New York might result in them keeping Fort Wood as a military base.
 
...and of course women will not be able to vote in Federal elections, something that the Attorney General of the United States stated repeatedly when asked during the discussion of this change. The National Women’s Suffrage Association has already promised to sue the Federal Government for the right of Massachusetts women to vote for representatives from that state.
“Female Vote Passes in Massachusetts,” Brooklyn Standard, May 20, 1887.

Are you sure about that? I used to assume that prior to the OTL 1920 amendment, women could not vote for Federal offices even in the states giving them the franchise. But in fact I was corrected on this point in a college history class on the Progressive Era--if I am to believe Dr. Clarice Statz of Sonoma State University, the moment women in Wyoming (IIRC, first state to grant female suffrage OTL) got the vote, they were voting for Congressmen and Presidents on an equal basis to men in their state as soon as the next Federal offices came up on the schedule. Because, for it to be otherwise, it would have been necessary for the state of Wyoming to require all its various registrar offices to print up separate ballots for men and women, and enforce their being distributed to the people of the appropriate sex, the women's ballots omitting the federal offices. Otherwise there would be no way to tell which ballots had been cast by men and which by women, and obviously even if it were possible to somehow do so, uniform ballots would require that all the ones cast by women be vetted to make sure they didn't mark up the forbidden federal offices.

Whereas on the other hand, the US Constitution devolves to the states by default the decision of who shall have the franchise. Nowadays this is nearly a dead letter since many Amendments and SCOTUS decisions have lowered the ceiling and forbidden various former practices, but not entirely--for instance, it is up to individual states to decide whether to restore the voting rights of convicted felons who have served their sentences or not (or even I believe, whether to allow felons currently incarcerated to vote or not!) Some states do, others don't. The most fundamental right states have currently is to decide how to determine to cast their allotted electoral votes for the Presidency--any state can decide to make it a matter of random chance, designate a particular individual to decide for the whole state, let each CD cast a vote according to plurality, award the votes by proportional representation, or any other scheme that might pass the state legislature. It seems probable to me that something really outrageous, like deeding the right to the oldest heir of a particular family or something like that, will face challenges in federal court that will prevail on some grounds or other, but the plain sense of the Constitutional language would make it an uphill scramble for some pretext because the language clearly makes the state in charge.

Thus Wyoming could in principle make all its Presidential electoral votes decided by women voters alone--if it were practical to segregate the vote that is!

So--I say this on the authority of Dr. Statz mainly since I did not buckle down and investigate the matter myself, but I think she must be right. The states, initially in the West, that did inaugurate female suffrage did not in fact produce gender-segregated ballots, and if they did not do so there is no way to distinguish men's votes from women's--in those states, their congressional delegation and Presidential votes were determined by the whole electorate, men and women together, and for a Federal official to argue that the states were obliged to protect Federal offices from women's votes, that official would be speaking in defiance of the Constitution as well as common custom, which made no distinction between Congressmen elected by very different franchise standards, and Presidential Electoral Votes cast by states with very different rules for determining them. These matters were at state discretion. It would not be impossible for Congress to pass a law nullifying state law permitting women's franchise, but the states affected could then immediately take the law to Federal courts, and the plain sense of the Constitution would probably win them court victories in short order. (There would be two tracks to the courts--one, the disfranchised women could sue on their own behalf, and that immediately; or the state governments could defy the law, hold elections including women, and wait for some federal reaction, such as Congress refusing to seat their Representatives or attempting to set aside their electoral votes for the President, and then the states could appear in Federal court seeking redress). If the enemies of women's suffrage were to persist the matter would surely work its way up to the Supreme Court in short order, and for SCOTUS to rule any way but to affirm the individual state's rights to allow women voters and for all offices, even Federal, would probably generate mass outrage leading to a national amendment anyway.

Meanwhile, an anti-suffragist reaction could indeed seek to get an amendment passed barring female suffrage, but first of all I doubt it would pass, secondly doing so would put the burden on them to enforce it. The easiest approach would be to forbid women to vote in all states, which would cause great anger in the states where they had been enfranchised. If states are grudgingly permitted to run their internal affairs as they saw fit in these matters but forbidden to let women determine the Federal offices, they'd have to print dual ballots and enforce their separate administration.

Now you have an ATL and in its development, it is possible something slipped in that makes the anti-suffragist's job easier. For instance, in rewriting the Constitution, it is possible that the delegation of the right to determine suffrage to the individual states was reworded so as to say "men" explicitly or some such. Or--it may be that I am forgetting something you may have said explicitly, about the right to determine suffrage either in Federal elections alone or in general being taken from the states and given to US Federal legislation. But in the latter case, it was not possible for Massachusetts to change its franchise anyway; it would be in Federal hands. Congress taking over the conduct of Federal elections but not state ones seems strange; if the two processes are not to be completely separated, so that one votes for Representatives and the President at one site but then has to go to a different polling place to vote for state offices, it would mean that Federal authorities--and who executes this, on the precinct level?--oversee state elections as well. Or else they legally mandate the state officials to serve Federal orders?

It can be done, but in fact would require a big stink at some point.

Don't forget that in addition to the Constitution being even more firm about the states' rights to determine for themselves how to cast electoral votes for the Presidency, until the Progressive Era reforms of OTL, the US Senators were also appointed by state governments, again according to whatever process the separate state legislatures had enacted--generally the legislatures reserved the right to themselves, but they again had broad discretion as to how to appoint whomever they pleased.

Barring federal law forbidding all women everywhere in the Union to vote, which would probably require an Amendment to prevent it being overturned in the courts, the upshot, even if another law forbade states to allow them to vote for Representatives in Congress, is pro-suffrage states having women influence both the Presidential electoral vote and the composition of the Senate. It would be entirely possible for the pro-suffrage states to hold a majority of Presidential electoral votes, for a woman (born in the USA, over the age of 35, not convicted of felonies, of course!) to run for President and be elected by these pro-suffrage states, and for her to take office facing a Senate if not a House largely elected (indirectly via state legislatures) by a half female electorate as well--perhaps, to make a point, a number of pro-suffrage states will have laid the groundwork sending one female Senator after another to the Senate!

I am not aware of any law that would have prevented this outcome if the American people had chosen to so vote; it was not legally forbidden for women to hold office, just unheard of. Correct me if I am wrong!

What the 1920s Amendment did was forbid states to exclude women from voting and office, not free them to allow it. They were free to allow it by default, and no provision had been made for a firewall protecting Federal offices from female influences either. Such provisions might have been made but they would be innovations, probably not popular enough to drive through, and enforcement would create difficulties.

In your ATL a special law that amounts to forbidding women to vote for Congress alone would have more effect than OTL since there is the separate office of the Speaker having great power, but still the House might be boxed in by a President and a Senate beholden to women voters, and put political pressure on the out of step Congress to get in line with universal adult suffrage. They could change more laws to beat the women back, but I think such legislation would tend to die on the vine as every Representative and Senator and state legislator who tried it slinks home to face their wives, daughters, sisters and mothers.
 
Is Fort Wood on what's know in OTL as Liberty Island still an active military base? I'm guessing that paranoia regarding a future invasion of New York might result in them keeping Fort Wood as a military base.

I'm not sure to be honest. Britain has basically been seen as an ally since the War, so I don't know that they would be paranoid about an invasion of the region. The only threat was from the Slaver states during the conflict, and obviously that isn't an issue any more, and the government has troops stationed on Manhattan itself for awhile. It is possible that they may have kept Ft. Wood active as well.

Are you sure about that? ....

So originally I thought about that as well. But then I remembered, from Chapter 7 of this TL, that the 1863 Voting Rights Amendment, the 20th Amendment, states that the "only requirement for voting rights in the United States is that the person be a male citizen, 21 years old or older, who has resided in his state for at least a year."

What happens in state elections is a gray area, which is why the Massachusetts law hasn't been challenged, but why the AG has stated that women in MA can't vote for Federal officials.

There will likely be a SCOTUS ruling on the matter in 1889 or 1890, but not sure which way that will go.
 
I'm not sure to be honest. Britain has basically been seen as an ally since the War, so I don't know that they would be paranoid about an invasion of the region. The only threat was from the Slaver states during the conflict, and obviously that isn't an issue any more, and the government has troops stationed on Manhattan itself for awhile. It is possible that they may have kept Ft. Wood active as well.

I've got two ideas regarding that.
  1. It's where the troops stationed in Manhattan go when the city really takes off. Why? Because that way they'd be a stone's throw away without making the residents of the growing city feel like they're under military occupation. After that, it can be turned into a historical museum after the star-fort design becomes obsolete.
  2. Any chances of it being used as the gateway into America rather than Ellis Island? They needed to massively expand the original island to fit the facility on it, so a pre-existing site on a larger island might work too.
 
I've got two ideas regarding that.
  1. It's where the troops stationed in Manhattan go when the city really takes off. Why? Because that way they'd be a stone's throw away without making the residents of the growing city feel like they're under military occupation. After that, it can be turned into a historical museum after the star-fort design becomes obsolete.
  2. Any chances of it being used as the gateway into America rather than Ellis Island? They needed to massively expand the original island to fit the facility on it, so a pre-existing site on a larger island might work too.

Hmm. I like both of these possibilities. Not sure which one is better to go with, but you will likely see one or the other in the next update, if that's okay.

On the one hand, it makes sense having the military moved off Manhattan. But I could also see the Fort being a good place for an immigration center.
 
Hmm. I like both of these possibilities. Not sure which one is better to go with, but you will likely see one or the other in the next update, if that's okay.

On the one hand, it makes sense having the military moved off Manhattan. But I could also see the Fort being a good place for an immigration center.
  1. If it's an active military installation (at least until obsolescence) the immigration center should be built on an artificial island south of Manhattan. Why? Because the purpose of an immigration center is to serve as a middleman between the ship and the harbor. So in other words some variation of the OTL Ellis Island facilities.
  2. If it's the immigration centre then the main military base could either be located on Riker's Island since the prison wouldn't be built for another 50 years. I personally like this idea, since I like the idea of the contrast between the older structures of the fort and the Art Deco buildings they'd be building as part of its new purpose.
Both options would have it retain its original name of "Bedloe's Island" since there'd be no monument to rename it for.
 
Top