Washington Burns: A Story of Alternate America

Your welcome!

Thanks for pointing that out. Some time soon I'll go back and edit my posts where need be.

I have some questions.

-With the 1830 revolutions being butterflied, does Belgium still exist in this timeline?

-Does the German Confederation still exist?

-Whats going on in Mexico and in South America?

At the present, no Belgium does not exist. France became fairly moderate under Henry V, so it is unlikely that the opportunity would arise for Belgium to break away, or if they did try it, has less chance of succeeding.

For now, the German Confederation is still in existence. However, tensions are building between he Prussian and Austrian spheres, and it is likely the two camps will come to blows in the 1870s or 1880s. When they do, the Confederation will be done.

The Mexican Empire is still currently plugging along, seeming to be stable, but that is largely a facade. Emperor Raul I has no children, and so when he dies in 1879, his leading generals will all try and take control. Whether the Empire survives this power struggle or not remains to be seen.

South America...I haven't worked out the details on this yet tbh. At a glance, I'd say the broad strokes of OTL history would seem similar, but the details will be different, and not sure yet of the outcomes. The Napoleonic Wars still happened so in the 1820s my guess is that most of the independence struggles go on largely unimpeded by what is going on in the United States. My South American history knowledge is pretty weak so I will have to dig around a bit. Open to suggestions :)
 
Famous People 7 (Zoidberg12)
upload_2017-5-25_11-55-2.png

Geoffrey Billings (September 23, 1783-May 29, 1860), Republican Senator from Maryland and Vice Presidential candidate in the 1828 election. IOTL he was named Braddish Billings and was an American-born settler of the area of Ottowa in British Canada.

upload_2017-5-25_11-55-30.png

Clarence Hinds (January 9, 1780-June 20, 1845), Governor of Georgia in 1831. IOTL he was named Thomas Hinds and was a politician from Mississippi.

upload_2017-5-25_11-55-52.png

Benjamin Jackson (September 22, 1777-April 28, 1850) Secretary of State during the Yates administration. IOTL he was named John George Jackson and was a representative and federal judge from Virginia.

upload_2017-5-25_11-56-7.png

Philip Grantham (May 29, 1795-February 1, 1884), representative from Connecticut in 1841 and sponsor of the Grantham Bill.

upload_2017-5-25_11-57-28.png

Anthony Lanier Martin (December 5, 1799-October 7, 1875), founding father of the Kingdom of Borealia. IOTL he was named Joshua Lanier Martin and was a governor of Alabama. IITL his parents sided with the Royalists during the American Revolution and moved to British Canada as United Empire Loyalists after the war. As a result, Martin would be born in British Canada.

upload_2017-5-25_11-57-47.png

Joseph Criswell (May 29, 1805-September 27, 1895), one of the founding fathers of the Kingdom of Borealia.

upload_2017-5-25_11-58-8.png

Upton Ellsworth (January 29, 1824-November 26, 1896), Governor of Massachusetts in 1859, photographed in 1876. IOTL he was named Charles C. Ellsworth and was a politician from Michigan.

upload_2017-5-25_11-58-25.png

Joseph Robert Wallace (January 2, 1820-July 12, 1888), lieutenant governor of Massachusetts in 1859. IOTL he was named John Milton Wallace and was the eldest brother of lawyer, politician, general and author Lew Wallace.

upload_2017-5-25_11-58-50.png

Jonathan Kent (January 8, 1802-May 16, 1881), governor of Pennsylvania during the War Between the States. IOTL he was named Edward Kent and was a governor of Maine.

upload_2017-5-25_11-59-7.png

Thomas Newman (June 2, 1828-January 12, 1914), the first African-American Lt. Governor of Mississippi and the first first African-American Lt. Governor of any state.
 
At the present, no Belgium does not exist. France became fairly moderate under Henry V, so it is unlikely that the opportunity would arise for Belgium to break away, or if they did try it, has less chance of succeeding.

For now, the German Confederation is still in existence. However, tensions are building between he Prussian and Austrian spheres, and it is likely the two camps will come to blows in the 1870s or 1880s. When they do, the Confederation will be done.

The Mexican Empire is still currently plugging along, seeming to be stable, but that is largely a facade. Emperor Raul I has no children, and so when he dies in 1879, his leading generals will all try and take control. Whether the Empire survives this power struggle or not remains to be seen.

South America...I haven't worked out the details on this yet tbh. At a glance, I'd say the broad strokes of OTL history would seem similar, but the details will be different, and not sure yet of the outcomes. The Napoleonic Wars still happened so in the 1820s my guess is that most of the independence struggles go on largely unimpeded by what is going on in the United States. My South American history knowledge is pretty weak so I will have to dig around a bit. Open to suggestions :)

Makes sense, though Belgium broke away from the Netherlands. So the United Kingdom of the Netherlands still exists it seems.

Interesting. I'm hoping that Germany is unified by Prussia and includes Austria.

Will any of these generals attempt to restore the Intrubide dynasty?

Interesting. I don't have many ideas about South America at the moment, though I may come up with somethings. Do you think that Gran Colombia would still exist IITL?

I have some more questions;

-When will the next update be coming out?

-When will we get a map of the USA as of 1871?

-Will America try to expand by purchasing Spanish Cuba and Puerto Rico?

-When will Africa be colonized by European powers?

-When will another Russo-Ottoman war take place and when will the Balkan nations become independent?

-Whats going on with the Mormon/LDS Church? I assume they are in Texas/the region of OTL Utah if they still exist.

-As of 1871, is Borealia a kingdom/British dominion yet?

-Will OTL British Columbia and the British owned regions of OTL Washington state become a separate kingdom/British dominion?
 
Last edited:
Those mentioning ideas for India are a bit premature.

As of yet, we have no confirmation that John Company has been disbanded in this TL.

At some stage, a rising will happen in every TL. Whether it is as severe (or even worse) than otl will affect the response in London. There's also location to think of. In OTL, it was centred in the north, with much of the Army of the Bengal Presidency fighting against the British. In this tl, it could happen in Madras, Bombay, or somewhere else again.

Amongst other things, that could well affect race relations both within India and between the Indians and the British.
 
Makes sense, though Belgium broke away from the Netherlands. So the United Kingdom of the Netherlands still exists it seems.
So the only big liberal revolts Europe has seen is 1839, which of course leads to the short-lived Republic of Germany. It's possible that the Netherlands might have tried to break away during that time. I'm just not sure what the result would have been. I need to ponder that a bit and flesh that out.

Interesting. I'm hoping that Germany is unified by Prussia and includes Austria.
I haven't decided if Germany will unify yet or not, or who would do the unifying. Austria and Bavaria are very close, and it is likely that we will be looking at a dynastic union.

Will any of these generals attempt to restore the Intrubide dynasty?
Had to Google that one. It is a possibility. I haven't decided JUST how messy things are going to get there once Raul I dies.

Interesting. I don't have many ideas about South America at the moment, though I may come up with somethings. Do you think that Gran Colombia would still exist IITL?
I'm going to be reading up on that before I make my decision. On the surface, I like the idea, but I know that OTL Gran Colombia had a lot of problems and I'm not sure that they could be repaired via butterfly in this or not.

I have some more questions;

-When will the next update be coming out?
I'm hoping today if possible, or tomorrow. I'm a school teacher and yesterday was my last day with students and I am now officially on break so my free time has increased dramatically for the next few weeks.

-When will we get a map of the USA as of 1871?
I have a map of 1877 that I will release as part of the next update. I actually have two, one that is political, and the other that shows the transportation networks and some of the major cities. Unfortunately, it may be awhile before we see more maps, at least those made by me. I was using my work-issued laptop for MS Paint, and I turned that in this morning and all I have at home are Macs.

-Will America try to expand by purchasing Spanish Cuba and Puerto Rico?
Possibly one if not both. Haven't decided yet.

-When will Africa be colonized by European powers?
Soon. Again, gotta decide on the Belgian factor and a few other things first. My plan is to write this update about the Quincy Presidency, and possibly one after that will get us to 1882, and then do several Wider World updates.

-When will another Russo-Ottoman war take place and when will the Balkan nations become independent?
That I have no answer for. I'll have to read up on that from OTL and decide from there.

-Whats going on with the Mormon/LDS Church? I assume they are in Texas/the region of OTL Utah if they still exist.
No Mormons. Second Great Awakening fizzles out early after the War, and also the Smith family does not move from Vermont to New York like in OTL due to part of the state being given over to the British.

-As of 1871, is Borealia a kingdom/British dominion yet?

-Will OTL British Columbia and the British owned regions of OTL Washington state become a separate kingdom/British dominion?
It will be in 1874, and Borealia will stretch from sea to shining sea just like OTL Canada.
 
So is the US going to keep shrinking?

No. No more territorial loss. In fact there may be some territorial gain. I'm kicking around the idea of Texas selling what is OTL Utah and Colorado to the US. Also, as suggested, either Cuba or Puerto Rico (or both) may find their way to US control one way or another.
 
Chapter 11: The Quincy Presidency, 1871-1877
---The Quincy Presidency (1871-1877)---

Simply put, public education in America would be what it is today without Frederick Preston and his followers. Preston began teaching in 1812 at the age of 22 in New York, in a simple city-funded school near Albany. By the age of 39, he was a professor at Columbia University, researching and teaching on psychology and human development, and a major advocate of expanding public education. He proposed his “Pyramid Education System” at the age of 43, in 1833, and soon got the ability to test his proposal in the nation’s new capital in the District of Washington. In January, 1834, Preston was appointed as Franklin, DW Director of Schools, whereupon he set about establishing primary, secondary, and tertiary schools based on his model, and partnering with the University of the United States, then still in it’s infancy.

Under the system, primary schools, for students ages 5-12, students learned basic reading, writing, and arithmetic skills, along with basic geography and social studies. At the end of primary school, students took an exit exam, and if passed, they would be funneled on to secondary schools for ages 13-15, where students would learn more advanced math and writing, as well as public speaking and debate skills, and some basic introduction to classical history and language. At the end of secondary school, students passing the exit exams graduated up to tertiary schools for ages 16-18, where they learned business skills, Greek and Latin, world history, and advanced debate and rhetoric. And from tertiary school, passing students would head on to college or university.

Students thrived under this system, and ten years later, Preston gave a glowing report about its success and expansion into much of southwestern Ohio and neighboring states. Preston wanted the Federal Government to adopt this system on a national scale, proposing the establishment of a Department of Education to oversee the massive system. If approved, it would have established the largest expansion of Federal bureaucracy at that time. However, political will was against such a system, so Preston’s dream of a national system seemed to vanish. He would instead focus on state systems, which saw some success, in Ohio in 1844, Kentucky and Indiana in 1845, and Illinois in 1847. Iowa would follow suit in 1849, and Missouri in 1852. It was a harder sell back East, where a mix of state funded schools and private schools made up much of the educational landscape. Preston found almost no interest in the South, where people were more spread out, and the people of means hired private tutors and were unconcerned about having a system in place to educate the masses.

During the War Between the States, Preston lived in Columbus, overseeing the Ohio Education System, but returned to Franklin in 1865 after the inauguration of President Brandt. Seeing the President’s plans to “go West,” Preston saw a perfect opportunity to spread his system more nationally. He drafted a proposal to have the Federal Government set up a pyramid system in the western territories as they were divided up and established. The “Preston Pyramid Proposal” was submitted to the President for review in March of 1867. Tragically, Preston died in April at the age of 77. His protege, Daniel Osmond, took up his mentor’s mantle and continued to advocate for the Preston Plan. Brandt and his cabinet liked the idea, and started to look into Congressional support. By 1868, the “Western Education Act” was being debated in Congress, and passed in early 1869. The law established a Federal Office of Education, under the Secretary of the Interior, to manage all education in the Federal Territories. It mandated the establishment of the Preston Pyramid System in the West, promoting the establishment of territorial teacher academies, territorial colleges, and schools in the major settlements, along with territorial education councils similar to those in the Midwestern states. Daniel Osmond, at 47, found himself appointed as the first Director of the Federal Office of Education.

Osmond was a tireless proponent of the Preston System, and he continued to advocate for its adoption nationally. The African-American controlled states of Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana, all got on board by the time of the 1870 election. During that race for the Presidency, the Democrats adopted a platform that called for the spread of the Preston Education System wherever possible, while the Federalists remained opposed, opting to leave education a state or local issue, like it had been handled in New England. With the election of John P. Quincy, Osmond and his fellow Preston System advocates felt a wind of change coming to Franklin.

In 1872, Quincy proposed raising the Office of Education to a cabinet position, and calling for a “comprehensive national education system” to be implemented by 1880. In 1873, Daniel Osmond was confirmed by the Senate as the first Secretary of Education, and in 1875 helped guide the “United States School System” Bill through Congress. The law, signed on Frederick Preston’s birthday on April 13, 1876, mandated that all states reorganize or establish schools along the Preston Pyramid System, establishing primary, secondary, and tertiary schools throughout each state. The law allowed each state to determine how many students would be in each school, and how many schools to build per township (something that would become federally regulated in the 20th century). The states were given until 1880 to have legislation in place to set up the systems in their states, and until 1885 to have the systems at least partially operational. Due to practical matters, this implementation would take until the mid 1890s, but by 1893 the system was completely implemented throughout the United States.
Wilcox, Dr. Julia. Educating Americans: A Comprehensive History. Franklin, DW: UUS Press House, 2008.

---
The American political scene after the War Between the States was, to put it plainly, a mess. The Democrats were the only large, nationally potent party. The Federalists maintained their control of New England, but failed to catch on in large numbers outside of that area. The Republicans were devastated after the war, and nearly vanished from federal office in the first few decades after the conflict was over. They managed to hold on to state level office in Georgia and South Carolina during the Restoration Era, despite attempts by federal officials to prevent this, and then thanks to the Dixian Diaspora, the Republicans found a new home base to thrive in out West at the base of the Rockies. Then in the Deep South, in African American controlled states, the newly established Freedmen’s Party ruled supreme, though in Congress and in the 1870 presidential election the Freedmen worked with the Federalists. In the newly established Western territories, and in Oregon, new local parties were starting to form. Granted, most of the settlers in the West were either Democrats or Old South Republicans, the issues in the new lands were different than that of those living back East, and while the Democrats supported Westward settlement, they didn’t always care what happened to the people once they got there. Some political observers of the day wondered openly whether or not it was even possible for the United States to have any truly national parties anymore.

This prediction proved false for the most part, and in part this is due to the “Grand Coalition of 1876.” In that election, as the nation geared up to choose the next President, there was a huge debate among Federalists about a possible “unity ticket” with the Freedmen’s Party. Many members supported this idea for reasons of principle: the Federalists had literally fought a war to achieve equality for the former slaves, and now the party should welcome them in as part of their own organization or at least work alongside them in partnership. Other members objected for practical reasons: they feared there was no way they would gain enough votes nationally if a Freedmen candidate was on the national ticket, or even endorse by the party. And it is likely this could have hurt the Federalists, but in the end, the moral argument won. Then, fate would have it that a huge scandal would rock the Democrats the summer before the election, greatly evening the playing field.
Phillips, Dr. George. Politics in the Early New Union. New Orleans, LA: Crescent Press, 2011.

---
CENSUS RESULTS: POP REACHES 26 MILLION

FRANKLIN - The Census Bureau has certified the results of the 1870 election, announcing that the population of the United States is now at 26,763,747. New York remains the most populous state, with 2.8 million people, but Pennsylvania is now getting close, at 2.2 million. There are now 7 states with over a million people up from 4 in 1850. Several states in the South have seen a massive jump in population, due in large part to former slaves now being counted as full citizens. There has been some criticism of the Census, as it did not count people in the territories, and there have been tens of thousands of people who have immigrated West since the War. It seems likely, however, that by the time the next census is conducted in 1880, that several of the territories in West will have become states.
“Census Results: Pop Reaches 26 Million.” Franklin Observer, April 1, 1871.

---
IS THE HOUSE TOO BIG?

FRANKLIN - With the latest election, and following the 1870 census, the House of Representatives is now over 600 members in size, and there are many that feel it is too large. Democratic Representative Thomas Gifford of Ohio has suggested that a committee be established to consider possible fixes to the size of the House. Some are suggesting reducing the number to exactly five or six hundred, and coming up with a formula for appropriating seats to states based on population. This idea is most popular among the Democrats, whereas the Federalists tend to support raising the number of people per representative from the current 1 representative per 40,000 citizens, to 1 representative per 100,000. President Quincy has expressed approval of setting up a committee, and the overall idea of capping or reducing the size of the House, saying “If we don’t do something, by the end of the century we could have more than a thousand members, and that is just too many.”
“Is the House Too Big?” Boston Eagle, March 1873.

---
CONCERN OVER MANHATTAN’S FUTURE

MANHATTAN ISLAND - Ever since Special Commissioner Hamilton announced the plan to rebuild New York City eight years ago, there has been a flood of new immigration to the island to kickstart the reconstruction of the island. Some have been American citizens looking to start fresh in a city going through a rebirth. But many have come from overseas: Irish, Italians, Germans, Jews, Turks, Frenchmen, Spaniards, Russians, and the list goes on. It is estimated that nearly 200,000 people now call Manhattan Island home, and of that 200,000, over half is likely foreign born. This is causing endless headaches for the Commissioner's office, as clashes between locals trying to return, other Americans coming from other parts of the country, and foreigners happen daily. The Friends of New York Society, an organization made up of former New York City residents now living in Westchester and other communities in neighboring counties, has expressed concern that their beloved home is being overrun by the “unwashed masses.”

Compounding this tension is the chronic lack of funds the city suffers. Investment from private sources has been slow for several years, and there is only a limited amount of money coming from New York State and almost nothing coming from the Federal Government, despite promises to the contrary. There have been proposals to dissolve the city and hand the land over to the jurisdiction of Brooklyn, which have been rebuffed by local officials in the strongest possible terms. Mayor William Porter stated, “Brooklyn is thriving as New York’s premier port, and one of the major ports of entry for the whole region, possibly the country. There is no way we want to be burdened with the Manhattan Quagmire.” Some in the New York State Assembly have proposed a different solution. State Assemblyman from Queens Robert Wray proposed that, “Manhattan Island should be discharged from the State of New York, and turned into a Federal District under Federal management. Let it be like Franklin, and administered by people appointed by Congress.” There has been some support from those in the State Assembly who would like to be rid of the financial burden of supporting the city, but this has been vehemently opposed by Commissioner Hamilton and his allies in Albany.
“Concern Over Manhattan’s Future.” Brooklyn Standard, April 2, 1874.

---
Ferdinand Zeppelin was born in the short-lived German Republic outside Frankfurt am Main in 1838. His parents, Friedrich and Amélie von Zeppelin, immigrated to what was then the Mexican Province of Texas in 1842, just ahead of the wave of 45ers, settling near what would become Neu Frankfurt, the German settlement near Franklin-on-the-Brazos. The Zeppelin family bought property and became cattle farmers, though it was far from their only pursuit. Friedrich quickly became involved in local politics, and helped represent the German community as the new Federation was established in 1848. In 1850, Friedrich was elected to the National Assembly. In 1857, Ferdinand’s father found himself appointed as a special assistant to the Texan Ambassador in Franklin, and Ferdinand accompanied his father there. This posting to the United States was important for several reasons.

First, the young Zeppelin would meet his future wife in Franklin, the daughter of a prominent member of the Franklin Germantown community, Elsa Frahm. The Zeppelins would be in Franklin from 1857 until 1866, and during that time Ferdinand and Elsa began a serious courtship, and the two would marry in 1864. Ferdinand’s father approved of the match, wanting his family to help be a link between the German community in Texas and its counterpart in the United States.

During the War, the Texans stayed neutral, and stayed in their embassy in Franklin as observers. When the Brandt government took the city, the Texans stayed on and did not follow the Slaver Union government to Atlanta. It was during this conflict that the second reason the Texas posting turned out to be so important for Zeppelin’s life. Both the Slaver and Northern Union used hot air balloons to use as observation posts during the fight for Franklin, and these observation balloons utterly fascinated Ferdinand, and he got the chance to ride in one of the Northern balloons twice. This fascination would fester long after the War and after the Zeppelins returned to Texas, and would result in Ferdinand becoming a major part of aviation history.
Anderson, Dr. Jacob. The Zeppelin Story. Nacogdoches: TU Press, 1999.

---
COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED ON HOUSE REDUCTION

FRANKLIN - First Secretary Benjamin Bentley announced that Democratic Representative Thomas Gifford and Federalist Representative Jacob Hammon have been appointed to set up a committee to come up with a plan to reduce the size of the House of Representatives, now with over 600 members. Federalists support changing the formula that calculates representation from 1 representative for every 40,000, to 1 representative for every 100,000. The Democrats want the House to be capped at 500 permanently, and dividing the number among the states based on population. The new Gifford-Hammon Committee has been tasked to create a proposal on membership by the end of the year. Speaker Bentley stated that he wants this change enacted, in whatever form, by the end of 1875.
“Committee Established on House Reduction,” Franklin Observer, November 6, 1873.

---
KINGDOM OF BOREALIA ESTABLISHED

YORK, UPPER CANADA - In accordance with an act of the British Parliament, the Provinces of Upper and Lower Canada, Michigan, Wisconsin, Columbia, and Vancouver have been combined together to form the semi-independent Kingdom of Borealia. The name derives from the Latin word “borealis,” meaning “northern,” and was chosen to be a counterpart to the British-held Australia, the name of that territory also being derived for the Latin word for “southern.” The territory between Columbia and the eastern provinces, known as Rupert’s Land, has been divided, with North Rupert’s Land remaining under Crown Control, and South Rupert’s Land placed in trust for the Kingdom of Borealia, to be temporarily controlled by both York and London.

George Campbell, the 8th Duke of Argyll, has been installed as Governor-General, the acting representative of Queen Victoria and the Royal Family, who will serve as Head-of-State. Surprising no one, Anthony Martin of Detroit, co-founder of the Federation Party, has been appointed as Acting Prime Minister of the new kingdom, until elections can be held in August for the new parliament, which is set to conveen in York, which has been chosen as the seat of the new government. President Quincy spoke favorably of the development, stating, “I am glad to see our neighbors to the north have more direct say over their lives, and welcome the creation of Borealia.”
“Kingdom of Borealia Established,” Brooklyn Standard, May 1, 1874.

---
WAR IN EUROPE! PRUSSIA AND AUSTRIA GO TO ARMS!

BERLIN - War has been declared between the Kingdom of Prussia and the Austrian Empire. There has been growing tension in the German Confederation for over a decade, ever since King Frederick William V took the throne in Prussia in 1861. The relatively young Prussian monarch is a political moderate, quite the contrast with the ageing, conservative Austrian Emperor Ferdinand I, who turned 81 this year. Squabbling between the two German powers has been going on for years, over various border disputes and each trying to outmaneuver the other within the German Confederation. This conflict arose from a dispute over the Free City of Frankfurt, once the capital of the short-lived Republic of Germany from 1839-1841. When the city fell in 1841, it was held jointly by the Prussians and the Austrians. The Prussians want to see the city be fully independent, and hoped to craft it into an ally within the Confederation. The Prussian representative in the German Federal Assembly, Otto von Bismarck, made a proposal to this effect late last year, stating that Frankfurt has been under joint-occupation for over thirty years, and it was time to allow the city to breath free once more. Austria stalled on the motion for a long time, but finally crushed the proposal in a vote earlier this year. Last week, the Austrians forced through a counter proposal ending joint-occupation and placing Frankfurt solely under Austrian control. The Prussian Government in Berlin has cried foul, and is refusing to remove its troops from Frankfurt. The Austrians announced that this was tantamount to an act of war. Early this morning, a telegram was recieved from Vienna stating that the Austrians had declared war. Prussia’s parliament followed suit this afternoon.
“War in Europe! Prussia and Austria Go to Arms!” Boston Eagle, July 2, 1874.

---
FREEDWOMAN CLAIMS TO HAVE BASTARD CHILDREN OF QUINCY

FRANKLIN - A Freedwoman by the name of Nancy Clark claims to be the mother of President Quincy’s bastard children, and has come forward now that she is free and relocated to Ohio from Arkansas, where she was previously held in bondage. According to Mrs. Clark, the young Mr. Quincy forced her to lie with him several times while he worked on his uncle’s plantation in the 1820s and 1830s, and that he fathered at least three children by her during that time, and possibly did the same with other slave women. Mrs. Clark, now in her 60s, is looked after by her youngest son, Joshua Clark, who appears to be much lighter skinned than his mother, giving some legitimacy to his claim. According to the records presented to this paper by Mr. Clark from the plantation in Arkansas where he was born in 1836, his father was “unkown, possibly a white oversee hired for summer.”

Mrs. Clark has stated that she wants the President to recognize his children and grandchildren, especially since he has no children by his wife Virginia. “Slavery days are gone,” says Mrs. Clark, “and gone are the days when the master’s family can use slave women for pleasure. He and his party say they believe in equality and justice and all of that, but he’s a hypocrite if he won’t acknowledge his only descendents.” So far, no one at Washington House has acknowledged the story.
“Freedwoman Claims to Have Bastard Children of Quincy,” Franklin Observer, December 9, 1874.

---
The Clark Controversy likely would have died out quickly and be almost forgotten today, had it not been for the fact that President Quincy’s cousin, Amanda Ball, came forward in early January 1875 to corroborate Nancy Clark’s claim that a young John Quincy raped her several times in the 1820s and 1830s, and had multiple children by her. She was quoted in the Observer that January as saying, “it was the worst kept secret on the plantation. My Father said nothing, my mother said nothing, and the slaves said nothing, but they all knew. My cousin got that slave pregnant.” This practice wasn’t exaclty uncommon, and had just been swept under the rug. In 1836, He and Virginia Campton married in Little Rock and then moved to St. Louis so that Quincy could work for his bride’s father’s law firm. The whole episode was forgotten. Up until the Amanda Ball confession, Washington House refused to comment on the story, but afterwards they had no choice. Members of Congress began to demand an explanation. On March 3, President Quincy held a conference before the press where he acknowledged that he had had “intimate relations” with slave women on his uncle’s farm in his youth, sowing his wild oats, but that he had fathered no children. Members of the Democratic caucus defended the President, as did Vice President Kinder. Federalists in Congress and in the Press did not buy the story at all. Editorials ran all over the country, with photographs of the President printed next to those of Joseph Clark, his purported progeny.

On May 9, Virginia Quincy had a heart attack due to the stress of the scandal. She survived, but doctors stated that it would be best for her to get out of Franklin and away from political life. On June 1st, President Quincy resigned, making Bradley Kinder of Indiana the 16th President of the United States. Kinder had been an elder statesman and considered a balance to Quincy’s brashness. It was understood that after 1877, Kinder was ready for retirement and the Vice Presidency had been a nice way to round out his political career spent mostly in the Senate.

Kinder may have been Quincy’s legal successor, but his political heir apparent was Secretary of the Interior Austin Campbell of Kentucky. The rumor around Franklin was that Campbell was really running things for Kinder, who was already in his 80s when he took office and still holds the record for oldest President of the United States. In late 1875, Campbell, 47, announced his intention to run for President.
Patrick, Dr. William. The Election of 1876. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.

---
GILFORD-HAMMON ACT PASSES

FRANKLIN - The Gilford-Hammon Act, proposed earlier this year by the committee of the same name, has passed both houses of Congress and is likely to be approved of by President Kinder. The Act resets the formula for how many representatives in the House each state receives, going with the Federalist proposed plan of 1 per every 100,000 people in each state. The new formula will go into effect for the 1876 election.
“Gilford-Hammon Act Passes,” Brooklyn Standard, October 3, 1875.

---
HISTORY MADE: FREEDMAN ON FEDERALIST TICKET!

PROVIDENCE - The Federalist Party convention has elected Augustus Bailey, a well known former advocate of abolition and a Freedmen’s Party leader in Mississippi, as the party’s Vice Presidential Candidate. The Freedmen’s Party has also voted to endorse the Federalist Party and caucus exclusively with the Federalists in Congress. There is talk that, if the Federalists retake Washington House in November, that the two parties may combine as one. New York Senator Horace Littlefield, the party’s presidential nominee, led the charge on the convention floor to have a “racial unity ticket.” Senator Littlefield told the convention that, “in this day and age, where the ghosts of slavery still haunt our nation, where the former President of the United States disgraced himself by forcing himself on an innocent slave woman, and where even now his party defends this action as a ‘youthful dalliance and indiscretion,’ it is up to our party, the party of equality, to stand up and say no, say that this is not acceptable in the Land of Liberty anymore. This party must integrate and prominently feature people regardless of race.”

Mr. Bailey, who has served in various public functions in Mississippi since he moved there in 1863 to help Joshua Black and other members of the Freedmen’s Party take over the state goverment, was elected to represent the state capital, Joshuaville, in Congress in 1866, a position he has held ever since. Born a slave in Maryland before escaping to Freedom in the 1830s, Mr. Bailey is a well known national figure, especially in traditionally Federalist New England, making him probably the most ideal Freedman for the party to put on the national ticket.
“History Made: Freedmen on Federalist Ticket!” Boston Eagle, July 20, 1876.

---
AUSTRIA DEFEATED NEAR MUNICH!

BERLIN - Prussian officials announced today that the Austrian Army has been defeated outside the city of Munich, Bavaria, after four days of bloody fighting. The Prusso-Austrian War has dragged on for over two years, and thousands of men have been killed on the battlefields of southern Germany. The Austrians had a solid start to the war in 1874, but after Emperor Ferdinand died childless in 1875, the leadership of the Empire has been unstable. The emperor’s brother, Franz Karl, took the throne after his brother’s death, but passed away earlier this spring. Franz Karl’s oldest surviving son, Maximilian, has been suddenly thrust into leadership, and has been beset by poor judgement on his part and that of his military staff. Maximilian himself was in Munich during the battle, and was captured by the Prussians. A formal peace conference is expected to be held soon, likely here in Berlin.

“Austria Defeated Near Munich,” Franklin Observer, August 9, 1876.


---
FIFTH NATIONAL ROAD & RAIL LINE COMPLETE!

CASCADIA TERR. - In a moment shared nationwide via the marvel of telegraphy, the final spike connecting the two halves of the Fifth National Road Rail Line, connecting St. Louis, Missouri to Astoria, Oregon, has been driven into the ground. Telegraph operators hooked up wires so that when the spike was driven into the ground at 12:00 noon near the settlement of Preston’s Crossing, a signal would be sent out instantly to telegraph operators across the country. The actual Fifth National Road was finished at the beginning of the summer, but the rail line being built by USRC just now caught up. For the first time ever, it is now possible to ride a train from Boston, Massachusetts, on the Atlantic Coast, all the way to Astoria, Oregon, on the Pacific.
“Fifth National Road & Rail Line Complete!” Boston Eagle, September 8, 1876.

---
The 1876 presidential campaign changed how American politicians ran for President. Using mostly his own funds, Senator Littlefield travelled to major cities across the country from August until the end of October, holding rallies and calling on people to oust the Democrats from Washington House and from Congress. Secretary Campbell and his running mate, Governor of Kentucky George Plank, were caught off guard and initially dismissed the stunt, preferring instead to follow tradition and allow surrogates to speak for him, and not campaign himself. “I will not demean myself or the office I seek to hold by going out and personally begging people to vote for me. It is unbecoming someone who seeks to be President.” It wouldn’t be until late September that Campbell changed his mind, but by then it was probably too late. Senator Littlefield held rallies in Boston, Brooklyn, Cumberland, Columbus, Chicago, St. Louis, New Orleans, Mobile, and Charleston, making a loop on the Federal Railways and National Roads. He told reporters if he had more time he would have trekked to Oregon too.

As with any election, there were many different issues at stake when voters headed to the polls in November of 1876: Continued westward expansion; the enactment of the US School System Act; enforcement of racial equality in the West; trade with Europe, Mexico, and South America; expansion of power into the Pacific; how to react to growing Prussian influence in Central Europe. But all of these were dwarfed by the still lingering Clark Scandal. Early on, Secretary Campbell had spoken up for then-President Quincy, saying outright vulgar things about Mrs. Clark in an attempt to downplay her credibility, and saying that Quincy had no reason to acknowledge the issue at all. He then verbally attacked Clark and reporters in the press after Mrs. Quincy had a heart attack. He was the bulldog for Quincy, and his champion. His forthright support haunted him throughout the entire campaign. Senator Littlefield attacked the Democrats and Campbell in particular for being cowardly, for allowing the old attitudes that had allowed slavery to thrive to still linger, that Campbell and his supporters were constant reminders of the “Old Union,” of Slavery, and of racial inequality.

When the votes were counted, it wasn’t even close. States that were traditionally Federalist went solid Federalist. States that were battleground states between the two parties went in some cases more than 2/3rds Federalist. And in traditional Democratic stronghold states, at least a few electors went to Littlefield. 162 electors were required for a candidate to win the 1876 election. Littlefield finished with 196 to Campbell's 116 (with 9 going to the Republican Preston McCleary, Senator from Dixiana, and his running mate, businessman William Barton of Jefferson). It was only the third time that a Federalist would occupy the Presidency, and the first time since the election of 1796 that a Federalist outright won the election (Hamilton’s 1828 election had been decided in the House of Representatives in the infamous “Devil’s Bargain”).
Patrick, Dr. William. The Election of 1876. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.


Map of the United States and North America in 1877
Name of the States and Territories in former Upper Louisiana
- Platte (OTL northern Kansas and parts of Nebraska)
- Dixiana (OTL western Kansas and eastern Colorado)
- Metropotamia (North of Platte)
- Lakota (North of Metropotamia)
- Washington (West of Lakota, Metropotamia, and Dixiana)
- Cascadia (Sandwiched between Washington and Oregon)



Map of Major American Transportation Routes in 1877

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some Notes:
- The Population: OTL US population in 1870 was 39 million. I am factoring without having Texas or California, and less flow of people from regions south, along with not having Michigan and Wisconsin and parts of Upstate New York, the population would be lower than OTL, at least for now. It'll probably catch up or get close to OTL levels by the 20th Century.
- Manhattan: The jury is still out. Part of me wants the city to rally and remain part of New York State and recapture it's place of prominence soon, but part of me is intrigued by the idea of it essentially failing for a long time and Brooklyn and other places picking up the slack. What do you all think?
- Clark Scandal: Looking for a away to break the seeming hegemony that the Democrats had on the Presidency and Congress. They had the largest national appeal among white voters. Factoring in black voters, the Federalists had a better chance, but to really win over the South I felt they had to really be true to their pledge about racial equality and bring a Freedman on the ticket, something that could hurt the Federalists outside New England and the New South.
- Augustus Bailey: Known in our timeline as Frederick Douglass (Augustus was one of his middle names OTL, and Bailey was his original surname that he dropped after reaching freedom).
- Austria and Prussia: Germany won't be fully unified yet (and tbh it may not happen ever). But Austria is going to lose its buddy Bavaria over this, and the Bavarian King will be forced to abdicate in favor of a pro-Prussian noble, and pretty much everyone else in Germany is now going to be allied or annexed by Prussia.
- The 1876 election: So I debated, a lot, about having a black VP so early. But I really felt that this TL was seeing a shift in demographics and values that does not mirror how things played out OTL after the Civil War. With so many southerners leaving the South for the West and allowing former slaves to take over some states, it seemed plausible enough for me for a unity ticket between the Federalists and the Freedmen. Maybe not the most plausible thing ever, but I felt it was good for the overall story and development of the TL.
- Transportation Map: First time making one of these. Probably could use work but was a fun first attempt. A few "new" cities: In Dixiana, New Charleston; in Platte, Ft. Calhoun; in West Virginia, Wheeling (OTL city, original terminus of the First National Road); Cumberland, Maryland (OTL start of the First National Road, now a semi-major transport hub and junction between the First, Second, and Third National Roads)

 
Last edited:
List of U.S. States and Territories, 1877:

- States -
1. Deleware
2. Pennsylvania
3. New Jersey
4. Georgia
5. Connecticut
6. Massachusetts
7. Maryland
8. South Carolina
9. New Hampshire
10. Virginia
11. New York
12. North Carolina
13. Rhode Island
14. Vermont
15. Kentucky
16. Tennessee
17. Ohio
18. Louisiana
19. Indiana
20. Mississippi
21. Illinois
22. Alabama
23. Maine
24. Missouri
25. Arkansas
26. Jefferson
27. Florida
28. Iowa
29. Appalachia
30. Gigadohi
31. Kanasaw
32. Oregon
33. Dixiana

- Territories -
1. Platte
2. Metropotamia
3. Lakota
4. Washington
5. Cascadia
 
Awesome new update! Awesome new maps as well! :cool:

That scandal with President Quincy was definitely a curve-ball that I was not excepting, although I'd question whether Quincy would have been working for an uncle on a plantation. The Quincy's were a Massachusetts family that I don't think were slave-owners by the nineteenth century. Maybe it was a family friend instead. Maybe this family friend was part of the reason that the young Quincy moved west out of Massachusetts in the first place.

In addition, who was Campbell's running mate in the 1876 election? Also, who ran for the Republican ticket in 1876?
 
Last edited:
Famous People 8 (Zoidberg12)
Time for some new photos, including for some of the people mentioned in the new update.

upload_2017-5-27_20-10-34.png

Bradley Kinder (February 15, 1794-June 26, 1880), Democratic 17th President of the United States from 1875 to 1877 and Vice President under President John P. Quincy.

upload_2017-5-27_20-10-43.png

Horace Littlefield (November 23, 1822-December 9, 1912), Federalist Senator from New York and 18th President of the United States of America. IOTL he was named Daniel Littlefield and was a Lt. Governor of Rhode Island.

upload_2017-5-27_20-9-55.png

Austin Campbell (September 22, 1827-November 30, 1909), Democratic Secretary of the Interior and presidential candidate in the 1876 election. IOTL he was a man named Robert Andrew Jackson Campbell.

220px-NathanielSBenton.jpg

Anthony Soley Benton (February 19, 1792-June 28, 1870), leader of the Anti-Independence Texans. IOTL he was named Nathaniel Soley Benton was a politician from New York. IITL he moved from New York to Texas as a young impresario, partly due to the economic ruin New York was suffering from after the War of 1812.

upload_2017-5-27_20-10-7.png

Alexander Hamilton II (January 22, 1782-October 24, 1868), Federalist 7th President of the United States from 1829-1835. IOTL he was named Phillip Hamilton and was the eldest son of Alexander Hamilton. IITL Alexander Hamilton decided to name his firstborn son after himself instead of his second-born son, who was born IOTL and IITL in 1786, except that IITL he is the one named Philip Hamilton (confusing I know). IOTL Philip Hammond died in a duel at the age of 19 in 1801. IITL no such duel ever happens.

upload_2017-5-27_19-53-44.png

Thomas Gifford (1821-May 8, 1899), English-born Democratic representative from Ohio. IOTL he was named Charles Gifford and was a Canadian Conservative politician from Ontario. IITL his parents moved to the United States of America when he was only twelve years old in 1833.

upload_2017-5-27_20-10-14.png

Jacob Hammon (October 26, 1824-December 23, 1914), Federalist representative from New Jersey.

Augustus_Porter.jpg

William Augustus Porter (January 18, 1798-October 14, 1888), Mayor of Brooklyn in 1874. IOTL he was named Augustus Seymour Porter and was a New York-born politician from Michigan. With Michigan a part of British Canada IITL, he never moves out of New York.
 
Last edited:
It would be interesting to see New York rebuilt.

Well, there's a plan in place for that. How well it is carried out....?
Don't worry. New York won't just be abandoned. It is in too strategic of an area for trade to have that happen. It is just that Manhattan may play second fiddle to Brooklyn for awhile.
On the plus side, the President is now from New York, so he might be able to make sure federal funding arrives to help revive the city. Time will tell.

Awesome new update! Awesome new maps as well! :cool:

That scandal with President Quincy was definitely a curve-ball that I was not excepting, although I'd question whether Quincy would have been working for an uncle on a plantation. The Quincy's were a Massachusetts family that I don't think were slave-owners by the nineteenth century. Maybe it was a family friend instead. Maybe this family friend was part of the reason that the young Quincy moved west out of Massachusetts in the first place.

In addition, who was Campbell's running mate in the 1876 election? Also, who ran for the Republican ticket in 1876?

Yeah, I wanted to throw a wrench in things a bit. My thought was that the Uncle went west earlier, but it could be a friend of the family instead. Keep in mind I tend to be writing from more of a position that I am making up the characters, as opposed to always picking out OTL people from obscurity.
View attachment 324860
Alexander Hamilton II (January 22, 1782-October 24, 1868), Federalist 7th President of the United States from 1829-1835. IOTL he was named Phillip Hamilton and was the eldest son of Alexander Hamilton. IITL Alexander Hamilton decided to name his firstborn son after himself instead of his second-born son, who was born IOTL and IITL in 1786, except that IITL he is the one named Philip Hamilton (confusing I know). IOTL Philip Hammond died in a duel at the age of 19 in 1801. IITL no such duel ever happens.

So, this doesn't work. The POD is in 1814, so Alexander Hamilton naming his son something different doesn't work. President Alexander Hamilton II ITTL is Alexander Hamilton, Jr. of OTL, the second son of Alexander Hamilton. ITTL, he becomes known in history as AH II, because his son and grandson and possibly more descendants who keep the name going. AH III is currently running Manhattan and trying to oversee the rebuilding of the city.
 
In addition, who was Campbell's running mate in the 1876 election? Also, who ran for the Republican ticket in 1876?

I've updated the post to include that information:
- Democrat VP: George Plank, Gov. of Kentucky
- Republican P: Preston McCleary, Senator from Dixiana
- Republican VP: William Barton, Businessman from Jefferson
 
Famous People 9 (Zoidberg12)
I've updated the post to include that information:
- Democrat VP: George Plank, Gov. of Kentucky
- Republican P: Preston McCleary, Senator from Dixiana
- Republican VP: William Barton, Businessman from Jefferson

Thank you. Here are some photos for these figures.

upload_2017-6-1_11-44-53.png

George Plank (September 16, 1833-December 12, 1915). IOTL this is a photo of an unknown man from the 1870s.

photo

Preston McCleary (February 28, 1807-March 1, 1882). IOTL he was named George W. McCleary and was a representative from Iowa.

220px-Ben_Barton.jpg

William Barton (June 8, 1823-September 20, 1897). IOTL he was named Ben Barton and was a South Carolina-born settler of California.
 
Well, there's a plan in place for that. How well it is carried out....?
Don't worry. New York won't just be abandoned. It is in too strategic of an area for trade to have that happen. It is just that Manhattan may play second fiddle to Brooklyn for awhile.
On the plus side, the President is now from New York, so he might be able to make sure federal funding arrives to help revive the city. Time will tell.

Heres hoping that New York City, one of my favorite American cities of all time, makes an amazing comeback! New immigration that was touched upon in the last update should definitely help.

Yeah, I wanted to throw a wrench in things a bit. My thought was that the Uncle went west earlier, but it could be a friend of the family instead. Keep in mind I tend to be writing from more of a position that I am making up the characters, as opposed to always picking out OTL people from obscurity.

I see. However, since you made my previous picture posts canon, I think having him as a family friend makes more sense.

So, this doesn't work. The POD is in 1814, so Alexander Hamilton naming his son something different doesn't work. President Alexander Hamilton II ITTL is Alexander Hamilton, Jr. of OTL, the second son of Alexander Hamilton. ITTL, he becomes known in history as AH II, because his son and grandson and possibly more descendants who keep the name going. AH III is currently running Manhattan and trying to oversee the rebuilding of the city.

I only did this because I could not for the life of me find a picture of Alexander Hamilton Jr. (1786-1875) so I decided to use the picture of Phillip Hamilton. I didn't think it would be an issue considering that numerous historical figures born before the 1814 POD have different names IITL, the earliest being Victor Yates, who was born in 1768 and who was born IOTL as Christopher Yates.

Heres an idea. Maybe IITL John Church Hamilton (1892-1882) was named Alexander Hamilton Jr. and OTL's Alexander Hamilton Jr. was named something else. I was able to find a picture of the aforementioned John Church Hamilton. This was way Phillip Hamilton would still have died in that duel in 1801.

220px-John_Church_Hamiton.jpg
 
Heres hoping that New York City, one of my favorite American cities of all time, makes an amazing comeback! New immigration that was touched upon in the last update should definitely help.

Yeah, New York will survive. I'm just not sure what form. Considering establishing it as a Federal District, with federal assistance in rebuilding (especially since President Littlefield is from New York state. It is possible, that the name "New York City," might not survive. Especially since Brooklyn and Broxnland are essentially "growing up" independently in this crucial period. It is possible that it will become known simply as Manhattan.

I see. However, since you made my previous picture posts canon, I think having him as a family friend makes more sense.

Good point. I can go and make an edit.

I only did this because I could not for the life of me find a picture of Alexander Hamilton Jr. (1786-1875) so I decided to use the picture of Phillip Hamilton. I didn't think it would be an issue considering that numerous historical figures born before the 1814 POD have different names IITL, the earliest being Victor Yates, who was born in 1768 and who was born IOTL as Christopher Yates.

I do tend to be a stickler about the "no changes pre-PoD" thing, but I like what you've done so I'm willing to not worry too much about this generally. But with this one in particular, I want to keep AH Jr. the same as from OTL. I like having the pictures, but if we can't find one of him, that's okay. :)
 
So, I'm still working on the next update, on the Littlefield Presidency.
But, I've also started working on some 3-D modeling for this TL, on buildings from Franklin. So far, I've just started on Washington House. It's nowhere near done yet, but thought I'd share what progress I've made so far.



Seen from the north side of the House, the main feature there is the North Balcony, which faces President's Square, the south terminus of Union Avenue.
For a sense of scale, the central section on each face is close to, but slightly smaller than, the original White House. I'm still working out the details, but for now I think the front face is the "private residence" (at least the second two floors). The back face is the "public" wing, where receptions and ceremonies are held, and then the two connector wings (east and west) are for administrative offices.

Inspired somewhat by the proposed Harrison Expansion from OTL.
 
So, I'm still working on the next update, on the Littlefield Presidency.
But, I've also started working on some 3-D modeling for this TL, on buildings from Franklin. So far, I've just started on Washington House. It's nowhere near done yet, but thought I'd share what progress I've made so far.



Seen from the north side of the House, the main feature there is the North Balcony, which faces President's Square, the south terminus of Union Avenue.
For a sense of scale, the central section on each face is close to, but slightly smaller than, the original White House. I'm still working out the details, but for now I think the front face is the "private residence" (at least the second two floors). The back face is the "public" wing, where receptions and ceremonies are held, and then the two connector wings (east and west) are for administrative offices.

Inspired somewhat by the proposed Harrison Expansion from OTL.
In my humble opinion that looks a wee bit too boxy for both the President's official residence and to have George Washington's name on it.

And why was the new capital named Franklin? You know what'd have been good? Naming the city "Columbia" and the District "Washington". so it'd be the city of Columbia in the District of Washington instead of the city of Washington in the District of Columbia.
 
Top