Would that be the Lincoln?A high-altitude version of the Lancaster with a suitable bomb-bay for dropping atomic bombs was under development IOTL by the end of the war.
Would that be the Lincoln?A high-altitude version of the Lancaster with a suitable bomb-bay for dropping atomic bombs was under development IOTL by the end of the war.
I imagine the UK would get its first atomic bombs in the mid to late 1940s; I don't see the US cutting off access to their research like they did in OTL given the situation, and they're right on the frontline in this Cold War. They might even just straight up license-produce American-designed atomic weapons, at least until they develop their own designs.Well, they would be busy doing the Generalplan Ost, while at the same time maintaining a large standing army, a conventional airforce, and the V-2 program. The Generalplan Ost would have killed the majority of the undesirables, and enslaved the rest, while resettling Germans in empty lands. That would have created a massive labour crunch and economic disruption in both Eastern Europe and Germany. Basically, they would immediately cause an immense population loss in Eastern Europe, and then having to move millions/tens of millions of Germans from German industrial centers and cities there to fill those lands and harvest the raw materials needed there.
Britain would have completed its bomb program well before Germany. And then, game over. Throwing just one nuclear bomb per month would have laid waste to Germany in a short time.
I'm not sure but it was published about the right time to be.Was it Götz Aly's Hitler's Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War and the Nazi Welfare State by any chance?
Such a program would suck away limited resources from other priorities. Extracting resources from Russia would take a lot of time, especially with Generalplan Ost (which would certainly harm their war efforts by causing massive loss in population and labour supply).especially if Germany has gone all-out on launching rockets at Britain (and perhaps later the northeastern US, if the war goes long enough for the A10 to see action),
It would be mixed with normal bombings. The British, knowing full well that Germany has better AA than Japan, would have never sent a single bomber against them. So, we can still roll a dice that results in all nuclear bombs being successfully dropped as the Germans only manages to shoot down normal bombers, or at least being intercepted far less often than expected.Still though, one bomb a month, and those bombs often being shot down before they reach their targets
I imagine that a Germany that's defeated the USSR in 1942 or 1943 wouldn't have all that many priorities by 1945 to worry about over striking the Western Allies. Generalplan Ost will be an ongoing fight against partisans for a long time, but it would demand far less troops (and especially far less military vehicles) than the active frontline of OTL in which they were fighting (and soon losing) against what was still a functional and powerful country, rather than just an insurgency (and an insurgency that's very quickly losing its fighters and supportive populations to genocide at that). Even while losing a war on a still-active frontline, Germany was able to build over 3,000 V2 rockets and cause the deaths of about 9,000 people with them. With Fortress Europe only threatened by Allied bombing (and much less threatened by it than in OTL, with still-good air defenses), I imagine they could build and launch rockets in significantly higher numbers, and be pursuing the A9 design by 1945.Such a program would suck away limited resources from other priorities. Extracting resources from Russia would take a lot of time, especially with Generalplan Ost (which would certainly harm their war efforts by causing massive loss in population and labour supply).
It would be mixed with normal bombings. The British, knowing full well that Germany has better AA than Japan, would have never sent a single bomber against them. So, we can still roll a dice that results in all nuclear bombs being successfully dropped as the Germans only manages to shoot down normal bombers, or at least being intercepted far less often than expected.
Several nukes hitting the Ruhr would have destroyed at least a third of Germany's industroal capacity.
Even most members of the Inner Party don't think the Inner Party's way, ironically. Remember, admission to the Party was by what was essentially an IQ test: the 98th and 99th percentiles were admitted to the Inner Party, and the 85th to 97th percentiles to the Outer Party. If 1984 was real, there would probably be more "true believers" in the Outer Party. Both the Inner and Outer Party would be rife with opportunists, but I really doubt most people who qualified for the Inner Party would believe in that nonsense....I've always been somewhat skeptical of how thoroughly "brainwashing" and propaganda can truly reshape people's minds. Not that they can't and don't have an effect, but at the end of the day, I think people know when they're suffering and are hard-wired to dislike it, even if they're being told that it's all for the glory of the Reich or the master race or whatever. I also think that people have enough of a bullshit detector to be able to tell lying and corruption for what they are and to feel cheated when their supposed betters engage in such behaviors.
That's not to say that people don't ever self-sacrifice for what they perceive as a greater good - clearly they can and they do. But when weeks and months of poverty and chaos drag on into years, at some point people will start to question whether or not all their suffering is necessary. Maybe you can still *scare* them into keeping quiet and doing as they're told, but that's different from actually winning their loyalty.
I guess it sort of comes down to who you think is right in the debate between Winston Smith and O'Brien in 1984. Personally I tend to side with Winston - I don't think it's actually possible to completely reshape people's mindsets the way the Party is attempting, or that, for example, banning the word "freedom" from Newspeak will eradicate the concept altogether. It appears to me that the Inner Party are the only ones who have actually double-thought themselves into believing their own propaganda, whereas the Outer Party seem more like they're just going along to get along (surely Winston and Julia aren't the only ones to privately resent the regime or perceive that what they're being told is untrue) and the Proles are kept in line by diverting their attention to smaller-scale issues. That's not to say that Big Brother's regime couldn't survive for a while yet - it could - but it would be through coercion and state terror, not through actually converting everyone to the Inner Party's way of thinking.
There's an interesting scene in the book of the New Sun by Gene Wolfe where a prisoner tells a story. He's from a society where a version of newspeak has succeeded that has totally reshaped how language is used. People only speak in passages from approved texts and thus thoughtcrime is impossible. except not really because they just use approved texts to still express human emotions, but it does need to be interprepted. I always imagine this is what would really happen with newspeak people desire to express basic human emotions whether they are "approved" or not.I guess it sort of comes down to who you think is right in the debate between Winston Smith and O'Brien in 1984. Personally I tend to side with Winston - I don't think it's actually possible to completely reshape people's mindsets the way the Party is attempting, or that, for example, banning the word "freedom" from Newspeak will eradicate the concept altogether. It appears to me that the Inner Party are the only ones who have actually double-thought themselves into believing their own propaganda, whereas the Outer Party seem more like they're just going along to get along (surely Winston and Julia aren't the only ones to privately resent the regime or perceive that what they're being told is untrue) and the Proles are kept in line by diverting their attention to smaller-scale issues. That's not to say that Big Brother's regime couldn't survive for a while yet - it could - but it would be through coercion and state terror, not through actually converting everyone to the Inner Party's way of thinking.
That is utter crap. After 1923 the German economy was doing well, even if it was propped up by American loans. It wasn’t until the Freat Depression things went south again, and the Weimar leadership put in place plans to help the economy recover. Those would have worked had the Nazis not taken over and shifted so completely to armaments.You don't need to put in a date there beyond 1917 to about 1947. It will always be true, whichever year you specify.
The loans were the problem, it was creating a vicious circle of taking out US loans to buy US goods and then taking out more loans to cover the previous loans. The aim was political and not economic, to tie the USA to Germany in such a way that they would support the renegotiation of reparations. It worked for a while but even before the Great Depression it was already failing. It was a policy that was going to blow up their faces in the face of any economic setback in the USA, even one with far less severe consequences globally than the Great Depression. The deflationary policies adopted by Weimar in response to the recession might have worked, but they had a terrible impact on the living standards of ordinary Germans, discredited Weimar and left the country eager to listen to the extremists on the Left and the Right offering promises of easy solutions.That is utter crap. After 1923 the German economy was doing well, even if it was propped up by American loans. It wasn’t until the Freat Depression things went south again, and the Weimar leadership put in place plans to help the economy recover. Those would have worked had the Nazis not taken over and shifted so completely to armaments.
Pakistan and Egypt are countries whose economies are also propped up by US loans but their people are one of the most anti American ( even more than Iranians ) in the worldThat is utter crap. After 1923 the German economy was doing well, even if it was propped up by American loans. It wasn’t until the Freat Depression things went south again, and the Weimar leadership put in place plans to help the economy recover. Those would have worked had the Nazis not taken over and shifted so completely to armaments.