Napoleon Bonaparte is oftenly famed as a good strategist, considering all the battles he won despite having a numerical disadvantage and all the times he escaped encirclement/capture. However, some contest this claim and point to what they perceive as incompetence in part of the enemy commanders. They also point to Napoleon's fruitless ventures in Spain and Russia as proof that he wasn't all that good in grand strategy, while others state that he was indeed a tactical genius, only that he was just too quick to judge and inexperienced in long-term geopolitics.
The question lingers: was he really that good or was he just really graced upon by Fortuna?