Correlation of strikes with what? It just shows that 1914 would have most likely seen more strikes than the revolutionary year 1905 had it not been for the interruption caused by the war.
The French loans to Russia were for things they deemed necessary for a war, such as double and quadruple tracked railway lines, i'd expect the Germans to force some treaty article down their throat to stop that, they just lost said war after all. They were not exactly investing in Russian slaughterhouses and fishery, those things have not much value in war. The French credit would dry up and Russia due to unrest and strikes would probably be forced to default on the existing ones, this would sour French/Russian relations and the relations with any foreign bank that values its money.
While i'm personally in the " merely a rough ride for Russia" camp it still tips the balance in favor of Germany for quite some time, Imperial Germany has huge advantages that imo should mean they're the first (strong scientists, easily available uranium, large industry, advanced chemistry). A-H too is on the winning side, which means vis a vis Russia they're gaining in power and development not being burdened by finance and large scale unreast and i wouldn't expect them to abandon Germany.