Probably not--after all, there was no war guilt clause in the Versalles Treaty, either!
"The Reparation clauses of the treaty—on which, as noted, Marks has written extensively—
have given rise to the most egregious and long-lasting myths associated with the peace
settlement. Her main insight about reparations—which has been highlighted by Mark
Trachtenberg6 and others-- is that the Allied leaders in Paris were caught in a terrible
dilemma: they recognized that post-war Germany would be incapable of bearing the
enormous financial burden of rebuilding the territories ravished by its armies during the
war. But they also knew that their publics had been led to expect Germany to pay for the
entire cost of reconstruction and would cashier any head of government who settled for
anything less than full payment. They therefore resorted to a masterly sleight-of-hand:
Under Article 231 of the peace treaty, Germany would be required to acknowledge full
responsibility for the damage done. Article 232 would concede that Germany could not be
expected to pay beyond its capacity. Thus, the Allied publics would have the satisfaction of
knowing that Germany would be required to accept responsibility for the damage caused
by its military forces in northeastern France, Belgium, and elsewhere. The Weimar
Republic should have been relieved to learn that it would it not be required to pay a war
indemnity or the actual costs of the war, as France had after 1871 at the end of a war in
which no German territory had been damaged. Germany should also have been pleased to
note that the reparation bill would be based not on the total amount of damage caused but
rather on Germany’s economic wherewithal to pay. But Marks notes that no amount of
reparation payment would have been acceptable to the leaders of the Weimar Republic
because such payments were erroneously connected in the mind of the German public
with the widespread myth of the “war guilt clause.” As she has reminded us in her earlier
work, the word “guilt” does not appear in the notorious Article 231, and virtually identical
language was included in the treaties signed with Germany’s allies. Yet the myth of the
“war guilt clause” unilaterally imposed on Germany, which was propagated in the early
1920s by Weimar officials and opinion makers, has stood the test of time and continues to
find its way into histories of the peace settlement."
https://issforum.org/reviews/PDF/AR429.pdf